According to National Unity and Integration Department director-general Datuk Azman Amin Hassan, the programme would be held during school holidays. 

This is similar to Singapore’s Community Engagement Programme and the National Youth Forum, both of which promote racial interaction at various levels. 

For a start, the department, with the support of the Education Ministry, should consider carrying out small-scale camps at district or even neighbourhood level. 

A few schools in a selected area could send students for a field trip on Saturday to places of worship.  

There is no reason why young Malaysians should not be encouraged to visit mosques, temples and churches. 

Some Malaysians who have an inclusive concept of religion find it sensitive to visit places of worship other than their own.  

This is sad because we live in a plural society and no one should feel uncomfortable visiting these places of worship. 

For reasons best known to these people, they have no qualms visiting a mosque, church or temple overseas but they seem reluctant to do so in their own homeland.  

Often, it is nothing more than just a remark from a peer that puts pressure on them. 

These young minds should also visit cultural organisations. Show them the beauty of dikir barat, dondang sayang, and the lion and peacock dances. 

The unity camp idea will not work if there is a perceived biasness towards one particular religion and community. 

Youngsters should be taught to express simple greetings and thanks in Malay, Chinese and Tamil.  

Our politicians do that when campaigning during elections but seem to forget the practice once the polls are over. 

Films made by Malaysians, not necessarily Bahasa Malaysia movies, should be screened to participants of these camps. 

It has long been a sore point, for example, that Malay films get government grants but non-Bahasa Malaysia movies made in Malaysia by local directors do not, even if they win awards overseas. 

Movies such as Sepet and Gol dan Gincu, which have broad multi-cultural themes, should be encouraged. 

The Unity Camp and National Service programmes are serious steps taken by the Government to promote national integration.  

The signs are staring at us: Malay students at national schools and a majority of non-Malays, especially Chinese, at vernacular schools. 

There is little racial mixing that many older Malaysians had the privilege of enjoying in English-medium schools, which were regarded as neutral grounds. 

Sadly, there is no political will to revive English-medium schools even as our leaders know that our proficiency in English, especially among the young, is very low.  

And while the slide continues in national schools, we find that our leaders are sending their children to international schools or overseas. 

Those of us who attended English-medium schools made friends with children of other races, and this friendship has lasted until today. 

We attended Catholic missionary schools and never in our hearts believed that we would be converted to Christianity.  

But today, narrow-minded educationists and bureaucrats even attempt to stop churches from putting up the cross outside church buildings, let alone schools. 

Imposing their prejudices because of their authority, they have made it harder for Christians to obtain approval for church buildings. 

I can sympathise with Chinese-Muslims who express their frustrations in getting approval from state governments to build a Chinese-Muslim-styled mosque although they have their own land and money. 

Their plight has been highlighted by the New Straits Times and certainly deserves the support of Malaysians of other faiths.  

It is outright unreasonable to reject their application by suggesting that they use only Mandarin and not Bahasa Malaysia at their sermons. 

Unity camps can help promote racial interaction only if government policies are seen to be fair to all communities. 

Young Malaysians will feel further alienated if affirmative action programmes aimed at helping the poor end up benefiting the wealthy and those with political connections. 

Our government leaders tell us that all Malaysians are equal and their rights are guaranteed under the Federal Constitution but they must make sure that bureaucrats do not push their agenda unfairly. 

Our leaders must be brave enough, whether at Cabinet or Barisan Nasional supreme council level, to point out any unfairness and review the implementation of unjust policies. 

National unity does not end at camps and schools. Our young will continue to ask whether there is true national unity when they apply for entrance into universities, scholarships, their first job and possibly their first pitch at a contract. 

The bigger publications with deeper pockets are naturally the main targets. A myriad of people – including businessmen, politicians and advertisers – who feel they can get some reward from such suits are ever ready to pounce. It is not always about reputation. 

But journalists must be ready to face the legal consequences of what they have written. If journalists talk about press freedom, they should also remember the rights of the subjects they write about. 

In Malaysia, the hands of Malaysian journalists are tied, although under the present administration there is more room for press freedom. 

From the annual permit renewal to a host of other media-related laws, reporters and readers have long complained that the Malaysian press should be freer. 

These laws have become obsolete because of the Internet. A new medium with almost no censorship has emerged and the authorities must understand, and even learn to deal with, the new media. 

Over the past few years, journalists in mainstream newspapers have tried to adapt themselves to this new environment. 

Today’s newspapers offer more interactivity by incorporating elements of the mobile telephone and the Internet in the print version. They have added podcasts and videos to their news websites as added multimedia services. 

Not only is the competition among newspapers getting tougher, journalists working from their offices also have to contend with faceless bloggers pounding away on their keyboards from home. 

Some like Jeff Ooi, Ahirudin Atan @ Rocky and Patrick Teoh put their names on their blogs but many others don’t. But that does not mean they cannot be traced. 

Jeff Ooi and Rocky have made a name for themselves with their fearless comments and even breaking news. They have a huge following among Malaysians and, in the case of Screenshots, there are even advertisements, which is unprecedented in Malaysian blog journalism.  

Their blogging has made Malaysian democracy more meaningful although not everyone agrees with their views. They should not be regarded as dissenters because democracy is about tolerance. 

They have been bold enough to bring up issues that mainstream newspapers have not done. 

It is unfortunate that many Malaysians only look at the political scene in black and white. 

It would be meaningless if Malaysians were to agree to everything our political leaders say. We would be doing a great disservice to the country’s leadership if we do not speak up. 

Unlike newspapers, where journalists can consult each other on the legal implications of stories, the one-man show depends entirely on the blogger. 

But political bloggers, as opposed to teenage bloggers who write about their lifestyles and love lives, must realise that they cannot “print and be damned”.  

Bloggers and journalists are alike even if the medium is different. They cannot claim that their right of expression has been denied when they are sued. 

Many people who have been named in some blogs regard themselves as victims. Lives have been destroyed because of unsubstantiated reports on these blogs. The false news may be forgotten after a certain time but the damage has been done. 

Ironically, these irresponsible bloggers are still hailed as heroes even after being proven wrong eventually. 

Bloggers must be responsible enough to remove malicious postings from readers, some of whom use false names because they have an axe to grind. Surely, libellous and racist remarks have nothing to do with freedom of expression. 

If newspaper editors can refuse to print such letters or e-mail from readers, bloggers should exercise such discretion. 

Credit should be given when it is due. It should not be just a case of hentam (bashing) only. I believe that many of our bloggers, too, value fairness. 

Their popularity does not give them the right to hurt innocent people, particularly the family members of their targets who have nothing to do with the bitter politics they engage in. Neither does it make sense to target one or two personalities nearly every day. 

A few bloggers seem to have political ambitions, which makes a mockery of what they claim to strive for. 

Journalists and bloggers believe they are committed to making Malaysia a better country. Journalists are certainly not the highest paid professionals in town while bloggers have committed their own money but both believe passionately in what they are doing. 

The feuding parties need to stop at some point to re-evaluate what they are doing in order to bring down the political temperature.  

Just ask around and you will find that a number of our politicians have sent their children to international schools or overseas, even at secondary school level. 

Don't they have faith in their own education system? Or they, too, think we have lost the quality. 

Something isn't right but we are not willing to talk about it. The rot didn't begin recently but more than 20 years ago. 

We did nothing to stop it. Instead, we let it continue while we deceived ourselves with the objective of turning Malaysia into an educational centre of excellence. 

So we talked about building world-class educational facilities without enough input on the contents. 

Last month, Higher Education Minister Datuk Mustapa Mohamed revealed that many lecturers in public universities lacked proficiency in the English language. 

He said preliminary findings of a recent ministry study found that the level of command of the language among students and lecturers had to be improved to produce graduates capable of meeting the challenges of a highly competitive global environment. 

Basically, Mustapa is saying what most of us already know – many of our students do not have a strong foundation in English grammar. Without knowing when to use past or present tense, how can our students be proficient in English? 

We have compromised our standards so much that we now find some students who scored a distinction in the language in public examinations are in reality of average level. 

Not many of our politicians and educationists are prepared to admit this but employers often come across graduates who are unable to draft a simple job application letter. 

First impressions matter most to employers, especially in the private sector. If school-leavers are shoddy, they are unlikely to grab the attention of job interviewers. 

Mustapa has suggested intensive refresher courses in English for lecturers. It is worth a try but those of us who studied English during the days of the LCE and MCE know that one cannot learn the language overnight. 

A minimum of 11 years of studying proper usage of English – and a pass in the subject was compulsory – was how one learned to speak and write English correctly. 

It was a time when a top student in LCE scored only 5A's. Failing Bahasa Malaysia, English or Mathematics meant having to re-sit the exam. 

Today, no student fails in an examination. Except for Bahasa Malaysia, there is no fear of flopping other subjects. 

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad decided to use English to teach Mathematics and Science during his final years as prime minister. He knew the level of English had gone down the drain. 

The move came too late. Unless we teach English seriously, using the language for these two subjects will not help much. Maths and Science are about remembering formulas, not grammar. 

It is strange to hear Universiti Malaya Vice-Chancellor Datuk Rafiah Salim reportedly saying that the lack of fluency in English among lecturers was not a major problem. 

However, she acknowledged that steps to improve the standard of English among lecturers "is not to give English supremacy" but because "Malaysia is a trading nation and needs to use this global language". 

We should have gone past that juncture years ago. We should stop worrying about whether Bahasa Malaysia would lose its status as the national language because it won't. 

In fact, we have come to the point where learning English alone is no longer enough because the Chinese language and Arabic have also become useful. While many of us are still struggling over the teaching of English, others have gone ahead to pick up languages with economic value. 

If our teachers and lecturers continue to have a poor grasp of English, we should perhaps hire teachers from India and South Africa.  

They have read about the situation and watched the images on television
but many still cannot apprehend the magnitude of the destruction. 

The reality is that the monster floods in Johor have become a national
disaster. The death toll following the first wave of floods in December
and January may be only 17 but many thousands of people have been
affected. 

The rainfall has been the heaviest in 100 years. On Dec 18, 35cm of
rain was registered (compared with the average annual figure of 240cm),
causing over 30,000 people to evacuate their homes. 

When the water receded, they went home only to find most of their
possessions washed away. Clothes, beds, blankets and even simple
household items like plates, spoons and pails were all gone. 

For victims in the worst-hit areas like Kota Tinggi, Muar and Segamat, it is a case of rebuilding their lives from scratch. 

Unlike people in urban areas who work in offices and commercial areas
away from their homes, these people work in nearby shops, offices and
factories that were also hit by floods. Now, many of them face
short-term unemployment. 

It has been devastating for those who run small businesses. A Chinese sinseh found
his entire stock of herbs destroyed by floodwaters, and a mobile phone
trader's gadgets are now useless. Even crucial documents in police
stations are all water-soaked.  

These people have practically nothing left – no money and possessions. 

But before they could even pick themselves up, they were hit by a second wave of floods on Friday. 

Some 20,000 people had to be evacuated, including many in new areas like Johor Baru and Tebrau. 

The floods this time caught many unaware and certainly at the worst
possible time. Many Johorean politicians whose assistance was needed
were away because of the year-end holidays. 

Even the press initially took the December floods lightly, thinking
that it was another wet season, until the casualties started to roll
in. 

The slow response to the floods should serve as a lesson to us in handling emergency situations. 

Obviously we need to re-look at our drainage systems, especially in
towns located near rivers. For example, the Department of Irrigation
and Drainage is well aware that the Johor River at Kota Tinggi and
Segamat River in Segamat are prone to floods. 

If we can commit ourselves to spending money on projects that are
sometimes not useful, there is no reason why we should not take care of
basic flood mitigation infrastructure. After all, we are talking about
preventing the loss of lives and properties. 

Advanced flood warning systems such as flood alarms, variable message
systems and flood measurement systems must be installed in more areas,
especially in the East Coast, because the annual monsoon season always
causes flooding. 

Poor development planning and environmental degradation, too, have been
blamed and the authorities should not be too quick to dismiss these
factors because Johor is not located in the monsoon zone. 

Then there is the question of mop-up operations after the water has
receded. No doubt many council workers were also victims but the
clean-up process surely needs to be improved. 

We should seriously consider dispatching members of our armed forces to
help in such operations. They have the numbers, the training and the
facilities for such jobs.  

One major concern among the victims is the fear of an outbreak of dengue fever. 

But the biggest complaint from the victims has been the distribution of
financial aid. Many of them claim they have not received the RM200 that
was promised to each person. The Johor government has said RM5.2mil was
given out – but obviously not fast enough. 

This is not the time for bureaucratic delays. This is an emergency and the people need help fast. 

After four years, one would have thought that this sort of mix-up should not happen but it has recurred since the National Service programme was launched in 2004. 

Providing transport for the trainees at pick-up points is a basic necessity and if those involved in the running of the NS programme are unable to handle it, they should be sacked. 

It is obvious that the departments involved in the NS operations – which come under the Defence Ministry – need to be revamped. 

The public can understand, and even forgive, the hiccups and confusion on Feb 16, 2004, when many pick-up points nationwide were in disarray. It took almost the entire day before most of the 28,000 teenage trainees were settled at their camps. 

Some of the participants, accompanied by their parents, had turned up at the pick-up points as early as 4.30am. 

We were told there were "teething problems" and that "action would be taken to rectify them". 

In April 2005, the NS transport problem was again in the news. This time, bus operators in Selangor threatened to disrupt field trips if they were not paid for their services. 

One excursion involving 400 trainees at Kem Setia Ikhas in Semenyih was cancelled when the owner of two buses did not send the vehicles because he was not paid. 

In July, 40 Perak schoolbus operators who provided transport at six camps claimed they were owed RM300,000 and had to wait four months for their money. 

It was the same story last week. Over 800 trainees in Kelantan were told to go home because 19 of the 36 buses hired to ferry them did not have the required permits. 

Another 1,000 trainees bound for camps in Sabah and Sarawak were "stranded" for up to 12 hours at the Low Cost Carrier Terminal due to hiccups in flight arrangements. 

Fingers have been pointed at the Road Transport Department but the officials of the Defence Ministry's Jabatan Perolehan (Procurement Department) have much to explain for the recurring problems. 

For instance, the selection criteria for the six bus operators in the six zones in the peninsula. Surely there should have been stringent rules to ensure that these operators use roadworthy buses with proper permits. 

These operators had successfully bid for the contracts, reportedly amounting to between RM500,000 and RM2mil, so they should not be allowed to sub-contract the service to middlemen. And they certainly must not try to cut cost by using school or factory buses. 

The six operators are responsible for sending the trainees to camps. Another group of operators are responsible for transport around the camps, such as transporting trainees to and from their outdoor activities. 

It has been suggested that army trucks be used but most parents are against this idea for safety reasons. 

Unfortunately, NS Training Council chairman Tan Sri Lee Lam Thye has been blamed for the problems. Some people have even called for his resignation.  

He has become the face of NS because he has worked hard to make the programme a success but he does not have a magic wand. Neither does he have the executive powers and authority. 

Since his appointment in 2005, no one can deny that he has resolved several problems involving food and leave from training during major festivals. 

Transportation glitches aside, trainees have complained about the lack of manpower at pick-up points. In some places like Penang, only a handful of officers were present to register several hundred trainees. And the officers worked from a printed master list, not from computers. 

Poor supervision and lack of staff are to be blamed for such inadequacies. The demands of having to deal with a huge turnout should have been expected and dealt with smoothly. 

To accuse the JPJ of sabotaging the NS training programme is ridiculous. The JPJ has, in fact, carried out its job well by stopping those buses which did not have proper permits because the safety of the trainees is a priority. 

Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has good reason to be angry because the Defence Ministry comes under his purview. 

He has correctly called for a full investigation. He should now consider transferring out those officials who are not interested in the NS programme. 

The NS programme has been accepted by Malaysians, thus the Government should not allow a few rotten apples to kill the enthusiasm of the trainees and parents. 

We would like to celebrate Malaysia's 50th anniversary as one people and one nation – simply because we share one common destiny and future regardless of race, religion and culture. 

2007 should be the year when we shut out the voices of politicians who attempt to use racial undertones to gain popularity. 

The mass media could cooperate to keep out the extremist views of such people who proclaim themselves as leaders when narrow personal interest is their only objective. 

Last year, and certainly 2006, would have been better for Malaysian race relations if not for the ignorant utterances of such people. 

The rhetoric, the fireworks, the parades, the slogans and the media hype will count for nothing if Malaysians are not made to feel they are one people.  

There is no need to debate over whether we should call ourselves Bangsa Malaysia, Rakyat Malaysia or Anak Malaysia. 

As Najib said, these terms are merely a state of the mind. What is important is that we are all citizens of Malaysia. 

Are we ready to discard the need to state our race when filling up forms as we wax eloquent about racial unity or will we continue to kid ourselves that this is a requirement for statistical reasons? 

Incredible as this may seem, it is only in recent years that younger television interviewers use the term orang kita to mean one particular community and not Malaysians when on air.  

They seem unaware, ignorant or indifferent to the fact that other Malaysians of various races are watching them. 

Malaysia will be half a century old by August. We are no longer a young nation, yet many of us sometimes behave like spoilt brats who are unable to control their tantrums. 

Elderly Malaysians who have experienced the growth of Malaysia better understand the concept of nation building. They value the fact that Malaysia was built with the sweat and strength of all races. 

Malaysia cannot move further ahead, in the face of global competition, if we do not pool our resources.  

We should not impose more rules and conditions on ourselves when other countries are pushing hard to open up their economies. We can no longer blame our colonial masters, after 50 years of independence, if we fail to uplift ourselves. 

It is not just about harnessing the best brains but keeping them.  

We cannot pretend we have managed to stop the brain drain, neither have we managed to convince the best to return because we have not offered an attractive wholesome package. 

The only country which has been able to do that is Singapore. Instead of sneering at our neighbour because of age-old rivalry and envy, we should take an honest look at ourselves. 

As we turn 50, most Malaysians are able to talk about strengths and weaknesses in a mature way.  

We should speak out rationally if we truly love Malaysia, and not because of the need to win some votes from party delegates. 

Certainly, we have our strengths. While American and European businessmen who are eyeing the Chinese and Indian markets are signing up cultural diversity courses to equip themselves, we already have links with these two nations – as well as the huge Indonesian market. 

We can bake a larger cake together if we stop spending so much time talking about the size of each other's share. If we harp too much on that, the cake could end up being baked elsewhere. 

Talk of company listing in foreign bourses by Malaysian companies, an increase in migration enquiries and outflow of money from businessmen is surely disturbing.  

For 2007, let's hear more comfortable news. For once, let us all keep the religious and racial bigots in the closet if we wish to make Visit Malaysia Year a success. 

The majority of hard-working Malaysians realise we are all in the same boat regardless of race and religion. 

In the words of Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, all Malaysians should bridge the divides that separate them and build on the similarities that connect them. Sadly, there are some who are bent on building walls instead of bridges. 

In his Christmas message, the Prime Minister rightly reminded Malaysians that they share the same future and destiny.  

Let us respect our differences while we strengthen and celebrate our unity in diversity, he said, adding that he would dedicate himself to creating a thriving and progressive multi-racial society. 

Pak Lah's pledge to commit himself to a progressive Malaysia is reassuring. On our part, we should emphasise to the world that we are truly a plural society. 

Malaysia is not a Middle East country and there should be no attempt of Arabisation of our culture.  

We love Malaysia for what it is and we want to keep it that way. 

Goodbye 2006, welcome 2007! Let's make the year ahead a special one so we can have fond memories of our celebrations. 

How we wish the building of churches in Malaysia could be much simpler. In reality, permission to build churches is fraught with many forms of obstacles, with numerous government agencies seemingly taking their time to approve applications. And there has been more bad news than good. 

The result is that more and more Christians have to attend services in office blocks, shopping complexes, hotel ballrooms and even warehouses. 

These days, proper churches have become heritage buildings. Just take a stroll down Pitt Street in Penang and you will see how mosques, churches and temples can co-exist but in new housing estates, we are told this cannot be possible. 

True Christian values require followers to be grateful and thankful for what they have. The law must always be respected and there must be no two ways about it. 

Certainly, we will pray for our leaders and civil servants to have the wisdom, justice and courage to do what is right for Malaysians, regardless of their race and religion. 

Thankful we should be. Malaysian Christians, who make up about 10% of the population, are able to celebrate their festivities openly, which comes as a surprise for many foreigners because of the country's predominant Muslim population. 

They do not expect to see huge Christmas trees and colourful decorations on display at shopping malls and hotels. They reckon the festival is celebrated on a small scale behind closed doors. What's more, Christmas is a national holiday and there is even an annual national-level Christmas celebration, which is attended by key government leaders. 

More importantly, Christians in Malaysia are able to worship without fearing for their security. There is no need for vigilantes to stand guard outside churches to prevent religious violence. 

Even in China, where most Christmas gifts and toys are manufactured, Christmas is tolerated only from a commercial and holiday perspective but not from a religious angle. Christmas service or mass is mainly for expatriates. 

There are no threats of extremists wanting to bomb churches and our government has consistently demonstrated its tough stand against extremists who threaten the country's security. 

For that, Malaysians must appreciate the stability in our country. It sounds like a cliche and sometimes we take this for granted. We become overly critical of ourselves. We tend to forget that not everyone shares the insensitive actions or words of a few people. 

In a multi-cultural society like ours, there are bound to be diverse views and prejudices. Sometimes these views clash, leading to much uneasiness, hurt and insecurity. 

There will always be times when the ride becomes bumpy but generally Malaysians, regardless of their ethnic and religious view points, believe in living in peace. 

Malaysia has always been a melting pot. It is in many ways a country of immigrants. A look at the country's history since the glorious days of the Malacca Sultanate will testify to that. 

The diversity and multiculturalism of Malaysia is something we should be proud of. There is no need to be apologetic about it and we must certainly resist any attempts to stop it. 

Malaysians have lived in harmony for over 50 years, tolerating and understanding each other's way of life, and we should never let any politician tell us to live differently. 

We should also be wary of those who use religion to justify their actions, particularly when it is their own interpretation of religious matters. No one has a monopoly over religion. All followers and those affected by it have the right to discuss and deliberate on such matters. Religion is not the sole right of scholars, theologians, missionaries and priests. 

The beauty of Malaysia lies in the fact that the majority of its people are tolerant, moderate and open-minded. We are quick to shout down the killjoys who tell us not to attend open-house events or to wish each other happy holidays. 

Eating turkey, singing carols and donning the red Santa headgear does not make one a Christian. It is simply a time for winding down, meeting up with friends for a meal and spending some money. 

We believe that most Malaysians are decent, practical people who understand that the country is multi-racial and we all need to appreciate and understand its pluralism. 

And certainly, my friends of all races and religions have never let the minority impose their views on them. 

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all Malaysians.  

More so when there are men with tight-fitting jeans or shirts unbuttoned to their navels.  

I do not know what message Datuk Nik Abdul Nik Mat is trying to send. He must have the best of intentions but, hey, for sure, many Malaysian males do not want to send the wrong message. 

The Kelantan Mentri Besar has said he has no problem with dancing but it has to be strictly between men and men. And of course, women and women. We can imagine the kind of tourists Kelantan would soon be attracting. 

Many Malaysians must have thought that the state PAS government had come to their senses by proposing a tourist belt where tourists and non-Muslims could have some night entertainment. 

A kind of restricted zone where tourists need to produce their passports or identity cards to gain entrance.  

The 1980s word "disco" was even used, never mind if the term "clubs" are more understood among the young these days. 

It seemed possible as the PAS government appeared to have relaxed the rules by allowing pop concerts, which it had once frowned upon. Never mind if there was still gender segregation at these concerts. 

But State Local Government, Housing and Health Committee chairman Takiyuddin Hassan has now said that he was misquoted and that there were no plans to set up such entertainment outlets for non-Muslims in the state. 

What he had proposed was the setting up of a cultural village near the Pantai Cahaya Bulan stretch to promote tourism in the state. 

On Saturday, Nik Aziz made sure everyone understood that the conservative party was still running the state. 

There would be no alcohol, no mingling between men and women and no showing of the aurat (body parts that must be covered under Islam). 

The Kelantan Mentri Besar said he did not oppose dancing in discos "but it must be between members of the same sex." 

Recently, the Kota Baru Municipal Council decided to fine women working in retail outlets caught wearing "sexy" clothing, which include tight jeans and body fitting blouses, up to RM500. The council also banned the showing of navels. 

It is unlikely that businessmen would take up Nik Aziz's proposal of dancing clubs exclusively for men or women. 

Not only is his idea bizarre but it does not make practical sense.  

The people of Kelantan are also unlikely to take up his suggestion. 

After all, Golok, known for its adult entertainment, is just across the river on the Thai side, so why bother with all these restrictions? 

For the young, there is always the Internet. According to statistics, web surfers in the state topped the list for searching the term "Melayu bogel" (naked Malays) on Google's search engine.  

With so many social and economic problems, including drug addiction and unemployment, Nik Aziz should channel his energy to solving these issues instead of worrying about trivial matters. 

While the younger PAS leaders are attempting to project a moderate and gentler image, the older group is still not letting go of their orthodox brand of politics. 

Some of us will just dismiss the statements by Nik Aziz as part of the party's series of eccentricities but for many of us, this is the kind of government that PAS want to impose on the rest of Malaysia. 

Many of us in our 40s still love listening to the 80s hits by Boy George and George Michael, but an all-men club? Thanks, but no thanks.  

There are no permanent enemies or permanent friends in politics, as people say. Not only did they shake hands, Dr Mahathir even said Soros was not to blame for bringing down the ringgit in the 1997 financial crisis. 

The former premier said he accepted Soros' explanation that he was not involved in the devaluing of the ringgit and that it was done by other traders. 

Soros complimented his former nemesis for his "great contribution" to Malaysia's material development, describing him as a "great man". 

And we thought we have heard and seen it all. The pat on the back must have surprised many of us. 

In 1997, Dr Mahathir had blamed currency speculators for the Asian financial crisis, singling out Soros. In one year, the ringgit plunged from RM2.52 to the US dollar to RM4.596. 

Dr Mahathir had then said that Soros was using the wealth under his control to punish Asean for welcoming Myanmar. 

"There is definite evidence that we cannot disclose. There is no doubt he did it," he was quoted as saying. 

Soros maintained that he wasn't involved except for a single trade in mid-June 1997 and that his funds had not sold ringgit or baht. 

Ten years later, the wound must have healed. Or circumstances have changed. Dr Mahathir is no longer prime minister and Soros, who operates the Open Society Institute, has shifted his interest from promoting democracy in countries like Myanmar to fighting drug dealers. 

Whether Soros did attack the ringgit or not is now purely academic but the fact remains that he had attained renown for his attacks that forced the British pound sterling out of the European Monetary System in 1992. 

His alleged involvement in Asia following the attacks by Dr Mahathir helped him gain notoriety. Soros may plead innocence and perhaps he is telling the truth but he is no angel. That is certain. 

Rogue speculators, to borrow the words of Dr Mahathir then, such as Soros had caused much misery to Asians, especially Malaysians and Thais. And many Asians have not forgiven Soros. 

To be fair to Dr Mahathir, he said he was still concerned about currency speculation wrecking the economies of poor countries. 

As Japanese strategist Kenichi Ohmae then said, if Soros had not come into the picture, "someone else would have done the same thing". 

In short, while we have been quick to blame external factors, not many Asian governments were prepared to admit their own mistakes. 

The fact then was that despite the entry of China and India into the international export markets, the South East Asian economies failed to restore their competitiveness by making drastic adjustments to their exchange rates. 

There were also macro-economic weaknesses in several countries in the region, more than the governments would care to admit. 

Some of us may remember that we were lulled into a false sense of security and even superiority. 

We were tagged the Asian Tigers and economist John Nasbitt made lots of money writing books praising the South East Asians. All of us believed in our superiority and even invincibility. 

The Malaysia Boleh spirit carried us too far as we were kept busy making the biggest popiah and longest satay. 

Some economists had asked us to look at our wastage on unproductive projects and, of course, the region's notorious reputation for corruption but the calls went unheeded. 

With plenty of money in our pockets, many voters were prepared to tolerate the abuses of their leaders. 

They argued that it was okay for politicians to be corrupt so long as the people also got their share. Democracy and human rights were the least of their concerns. 

It is always easy to blame outsiders because many of us refuse to accept our own weaknesses. We like to live in a state of denial, preferring to fault others instead of taking a hard look at our flaws. 

Ten years later, we need to ask ourselves whether we would still give simplistic explanations for our financial failures at the micro or macro level. 

We have taken steps to protect our ringgit from the likes of Soros, who destroyed many families in the region with their greed. It is strange that he is now regarded as some kind of a hero. 

Until Dr Mahathir pegged the ringgit with his unconventional but effective financial methods, it was chaos for many businessmen as they saw the ringgit dip. 

Whether it was the failure of their governments, the greedy currency trader or Soros, they remember the sorrows of 1997. 

All the parades and celebrations would have little meaning if Malaysians do not appreciate, let alone understand, the meaning of independence. 

We must have the mood to celebrate National Day. Let no one say there is none because we have plenty of reasons to celebrate. 

Unlike the independence of other countries, Malaysians achieved theirs without shedding any blood. 

That is simply because we have always believed in the politics of consensus and moderation. That means no one race will have their way 100% and, so far, the leadership has carried that well. 

Our founding fathers recognised that compromise was a strength and not a weakness. 

No doubt we can do better and, as Pak Lah said, race relations is still fragile and brittle. Certainly, we all agree that more must be done for the sake of the country, especially the future generation.  

All of us must work on it. It does not just involve ordinary Malaysians – our politicians must be equally responsible. 

Irrespective of their positions, they must be accountable for their actions and what they say. Politicians cannot preach national unity and at the same time make racist statements that hurt the feelings of fellow Malaysians. 

Whether they are from the ruling parties or the Opposition, politicians must learn to restrain themselves from raising communal issues. 

The same applies to civil servants, religious leaders and non-government organisations that try to exert their influence on us. 

They must emulate Pak Lah if they genuinely support him and his model of politics, as he has always been consistent. 

He enjoys telling his friends of his childhood days as a boy scout at the Bukit Mertajam High School in Penang where he met boys from other races. 

His scoutmaster was a Chinese teacher who taught him what leadership and team spirit was all about. Certainly he played a part, whether big or small, in moulding the character of Pak Lah. 

National Day, as the Prime Minister said, should not be celebrated by just one race but by every Malaysian. 

That is simply because Malaysia belongs to all races. It is what it is today because of the hard work of all races. 

We have put in our share of toil and no race should be made to feel that he does not belong here. There are no more immigrant races because we are Malaysians. 

In the words of Pak Lah, we must be united as Malaysians to take on the world. Time is not on our side. 

The petty squabbles have sapped much of our energy. That has to stop. We need to catch up in this highly competitive world that does not tolerate the mediocre and those who are not prepared to fight the economic battles. 

We have to worry about the Chinese, the Indians, the Indonesians and Vietnamese. And we have to remind the Americans that we exist and that we are in the game too. 

Yes, we are a small nation, just in case we get carried away with our Malaysia Boleh spirit.  

Malaysians have had enough bad news. It is surely time for some feel-good news again and all of us must aim for that by playing our part.