Author Archives: wcw

An actual assassination bid

IT’S clear-cut attempted murder against outspoken activist-lawyer Siti Kasim.

Certainly, it is a matter to be taken seriously.

While we don’t expect everyone to share or even tolerate her views on certain issues relating to religion, planting a bomb on her car is more just a criminal action as it is an extreme terrorism reaction.

Every right-minded Malaysian should condemn this despicable and shameful act.

The police must be commended for their swift action, responding immediately to her reports that a suspicious-looking device was found on her car. There were sceptical reactions to her social media posts earlier, but Siti Kasim did right by bringing it up on social media.

Yesterday, the police called her up again for more information to assist them in their investigations.

While we understand that our politicians are focusing their attention on the six state elections now, we expect them to condemn the cowardly action of those who want to do away with Siti Kasim.

Most young Malaysians may not be aware but in 2000, Lunas state assemblyman Dr Joe Fernandez was shot dead in Bukit Mertajam, Penang.

Many believed it was an act of terrorism, although an open verdict was declared.

Eight years after the incident, the coroner’s court ruled that his assassination had nothing to do with business, political or personal reasons.

It became a cold case and sadly, it has been forgotten.

But earlier, there was plenty of suspicion that the killing was carried out by Kumpulan Mujahiddin Malaysia (KMM), as the police then said.

Eight individuals, including a PAS leader, were arrested under the Internal Security Act for their involvement in KMM.

There were unsubstantiated accusations that Dr Fernandez had been involved in the proselytisation of Muslims.

Till now, no one has any clear idea why the MIC leader’s life was cut short and who his real enemies were, as no one has ever been charged.

In the case of Siti Kasim, it is no secret that she has openly condemned those who push their religious interpretations.

She has expressed fears that the liberal lifestyle of Malaysians and tide of increasing religious conservatism and intolerance will get worse if we do not speak up.

Siti Kasim has also defended the rights of Orang Asli on land and logging encroachment issues.

She had her car serviced because she was planning to drive to Kelantan to meet some Orang Asli.

Her compassion for these indigenous peoples are well-known and many weekends are spent in uncomfortable settings as she believes in fighting for their cause.

Most times, she digs into her pocket and seeks support from friends and associates to help these marginalised Malaysians.

Many lawyers would rather play golf during the weekends than to be in the jungle.

Call her idealistic, a simpleton, uncouth or even a loudmouth, but Siti Kasim is a rare breed.

Not many Malaysians dare to speak up for the rest of us.

She is undoubtedly unusual, and surely, planting a bomb would not shut her up.

There is no money to be earned defending transgender people or others living on the fringes of society, but these are real human beings.

They exist and they are Malaysians too, even if we do not agree with their practices.

The attempted murder may have rattled her, but Siti Kasim has the support of many of us.

Indeed, 55 groups representing diverse interests ranging from consumer rights to student unions wasted no time in issuing a joint statement, saying that they are standing in solidarity with her.

Newsmaker Ruler


The release of Sultan of Johor’s book ‘Johor Throne – HM Sultan Ibrahim’s First Decade of Rule’ is most timely. — Others

HE calls a spade a spade. When the Sultan of Johor grants an interview, it’s likely to make front-page news because he doesn’t mince his words.

Although he is the Ruler of Johor, His Majesty is a national figure, and while his views are mainly confined to state issues, they always have a national impact.

He is outspoken and assertive, so most Malaysians rally behind him for daring to tackle subjects which reflect their sentiments but are avoided by others who want to be politically safe.

Whether it’s about corruption, poor maintenance, excessive religious rules or royal titles, Sultan Ibrahim ibni Almarhum Sultan Iskandar gives his views unflinchingly.

His Majesty will be in the news in the coming months because he is next in line to be the King.

The present Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri’ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah, will complete his five-year term at the end of January 2024.

Malaysia has a unique system where the nine Rulers pick their choice of King for a five-year reign.

While there’s an election by secret vote, respect is also accorded to the rotational system of which state is in line, where the selection follows an order based on the seniority of each Ruler.

The most important criterion is that a Ruler may only be elected if he consents to it, as clearly inscribed in the Constitution as well as the Regulations of the Conference of Rulers.

To most Malaysians, including Johoreans, Tuanku is regarded as a stern disciplinarian.

That’s understandable given his army training background, but many stories about His Majesty are exaggerated, and by people who don’t even know him.

The release of his book, Johor Throne – HM Sultan Ibrahim’s First Decade of Rule, is most timely.

The Royal Press Office, headed by veteran journalist Ravi Nambiar, has done a tremendous job in conceptualising, designing, writing and publishing this 356-page book.

The team laboriously pored over 50,000 pictures accumulated over six years, before short-listing 15,000 photographs, and finally, 320 made the grade.

The process took over eight months with 11 chapters determined to reflect the various facets of Tuanku’s reign of more than 10 years.

It begins with his momentous days, from the time His Majesty ascended the throne as the 25th Sultan of Johor on Jan 23, 2010.

But this book, available in Bahasa Malaysia and English, has provided a deeper insight to the man who has reached a milestone of ruling Johor for 10 years and is poised for the national stage.

Readers of this book will get a deeper and better understanding of this extraordinary figure.

He attended the American Special Forces Green Beret and Pathfinder course, where he completed 19 parachute jumps, eight of which were executed at night, earning him the prestigious Green Beret and Wings.

Tuanku has also made several successful parachute jumps in Bandung, Indonesia, which has made him an honorary member of the Indonesian red beret, Kopassus (Komando Pasukan Khusus).

He can fly a helicopter, training for which came from the Royal Malaysian Air Force, and he received his wings from his father, Sultan Iskandar, in 1982. And as we’ve seen, he can drive a train, too.

Basically, he is a fully-trained army, navy and air force officer – the only Ruler with that distinction.

Indeed, there’s an entire chapter of photographs of his army tenure, entitled “Disciplined’’, where he shares his perseverance and discipline.

Not many people outside Johor are aware he is the commandant of the Johor Military Force (JMF), the only state in Malaysia with its own army.

But my favourite chapter features his role as the “Head of Religion” where he has not only chosen photographs of his prayers at mosques, but also his attendance of celebrations of other races and religions.

He is the Head of Religion, but as the book rightly put – “His Majesty is also fair in his approach to people of other faiths and always emphasises the importance of unity and solidarity amongst ‘Bangsa Johor,’ irrespective of race and religion.”

The book includes a quote uttered by Tuanku on June 1, 2019, when he said, “I wish to emphasise that in living amongst people of various religions and races, it is imperative that we adopt the principle of mutual respect, spirit of goodwill and a heart of love.”

There are pictures of his visits to the state-level Thaipusam celebrations at the Arulmigu Thendayuthapani and Sri Subramaniar Temples in Johor Baru as well as the annual Chingay procession.

At a time when certain religious leaders cast doubt on the attendance of Muslims at such events, Tuanku must be commended for putting on record his presence at these ceremonies.

This book, as expected, has detailed his more published moments like his annual Kembara road trip, where he leads a convoy of motorcycles to all the districts where he meets and hears directly from the people about their issues.

His many welfare programmes to assist less fortunate Johoreans, especially during the monsoon season when villagers are hit, are documented here, too.

He goes to these affected areas and personally takes charge of relief work.

But an interesting chapter in the book is where His Majesty shared pictures of himself whipping up many kinds of dishes in the kitchen. From simple curry puffs to lobster nasi briyani to Japanese curry, he has real culinary skills as well.

It runs in the family as his sister, Her Majesty, Raja Permaisuri Agong, Tunku Azizah Aminah Maimunah Iskandariah, is also an excellent cook.

This book will serve as a useful and simple guide to showcase the momentous times of the Sultan of Johor for Malaysians to better understand him and his values.

“This collection of photographs that vividly capture the significance of the culture, ceremonies, functions and gatherings is a unique work for the benefit of my people and also future generations.

“Most people may not have had the opportunity to witness the regal ceremonies conducted inside the Palace. I hope through this book, the people will be able to have a deeper understanding and appreciation of the rich culture, history and heritage of the Sultanate of Johor,” Sultan Ibrahim wrote in his foreword.

More importantly, let’s hope this book inspires Malaysians, whether in Johor or other states, to renew and strengthen their loyalty and respect for our Rulers.

For more information on the book, email general@sijf.my.

Kedah MB in the eye of the storm

IT does not look like the apology from caretaker Kedah MB Datuk Seri Muhammad Sanusi Md Nor to Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah is enough to placate the anger at the Selangor palace over the politician’s remarks.

The PAS leader has attempted to explain his remarks, which the Selangor institution found highly insulting.

He has claimed that the comments he made during a Perikatan Nasional ceramah recently were twisted by agents of Pakatan Harapan and Barisan Nasional to cause a misunderstanding.

Muhammad Sanusi, in his warkah (letter) to the Sultan of Selangor, explained the “actual” meaning as well as the field covered in his speech and sought His Royal Highness’ forgiveness.

But it appears like it won’t be accepted, and neither will there be a reply.

The Selangor royalty has prepared itself to be interviewed by the police following the report made by the Selangor Royal Council on Friday.

The crux of the dissatisfaction isn’t just Sanusi’s remarks questioning the appointment of Selangor Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari by Tuanku; he allegedly cast aspersions on HRH’s ancestral lineage.

It is understood that the palace found this part to be “most offensive’’ and, worse, the Kedah MB made the statement at a ceramah in Selangor in a purportedly “contemptuous” manner.

The words were uttered at Perikatan’s Jelajah Selangor Baharu programme in Selayang on July 11.

The palace is also not pleased that Selangor politicians, who were present, did not make any attempt to defend the royal institution.

In 2017, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad also irked the Sultan when he made derogatory remarks against the Bugis community, calling them pirates, robbers, and criminals, which the palace deemed to be “extreme”.

Just last month, palace officials said the Sultan had reminded candidates and their supporters in the coming state election not to play up issues touching on race and religion, and sensitive matters that could destroy harmony and unity among the people.

He had said that all campaigns should be conducted in an ethical and responsible manner in accordance with election regulations and other related laws.

They were told not to resort to fitnah (slander) during the campaign, but it looks like it has fallen on deaf ears.

Topics touching on race and religion are still present, and worse, the royalty has been dragged in, even though the police have warned against using the 3Rs during the campaign.

It is almost certain that the Selangor palace will take up the complaint with Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail and the Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain, on the issue.

The state is also expected to use the mosques to remind the congregation during next week’s khutbah Jumaat (Friday prayer sermons) of the dire consequences of using the topics of race, religion, and royalty during election campaigns.

This is not the first time Muhammad Sanusi has had a tiff with the royalty.

Last year, the Tunku Mahkota Johor (TMJ) Tunku Ismail Ibni Sultan Ibrahim and Muhammad Sanusi exchanged strong words over the salaries of Kedah’s football players. Both states are rivals in the local league.

But this time, the popular Kedah MB may have crossed the line with his remarks as he made them in Selangor.

‘Malaysiana’ dream not idealistic

Multiculturalism has been forged in our history, and while politicians may fudge the plot sometimes, its spirit lives on in the hearts of the people.

AT a time when the political air is filled with a toxic race and religion narrative, the recent message from Perak’s Sultan Nazrin Muizzuddin Shah is most timely and appropriate.

Bestowing the title of Royal Artist on famous cartoonist Datuk Mohd Nor Khalid, the Perak Ruler praised Lat, as he is popularly known, for highlighting multiculturalism in his caricatures.

Indeed, we should be celebrating our diversity because it is our asset and strength.

The beauty of Malaysia is how all of us have been able to live together peacefully after six decades of Independence, except for a blot in our history.

The country isn’t perfect, but this is a peaceful place where the people have a degree of tolerance and restraint.

If you take away the politicians, most of us are thankful to be in Malaysia, a truly blessed country, and certainly it pains us when politicians continuously drag this nation down.

Malaysia has a serious image problem now. The endless political uncertainties will not boost our standing in the eyes of investors as the trajectory continues to slide.

The world has no patience waiting for us to get our act together as we grab headlines for the wrong reasons.

What messages are we sending the world when some of us are consumed by the length of our shorts or skirts and whether we should have concerts?

Meanwhile, the politics of fear will not help anyone, especially the predominantly Malay majority, which these selfish, hypocritical politicians claim to fight for.

Amidst the doom and gloom, the Sultan of Perak has rightly sent the message that Lat’s caricatures have revealed the truth of living in a multiracial society.

Sultan Nazrin said that Mohd Nor’s work carried a clear message – people of diverse backgrounds instinctively live in peace and harmony in a spirit of mutual respect.

“Diverse people do not harbour prejudice towards one another due to their differences in race, religious beliefs, cultural practices, and language proficiency,” he said in his opening speech at the Lat House Gallery at Jalan Bemban on Saturday.

“Through his casual sketches, Mohd Nor has managed to capture the harmonic essence of life in a pluralist society.

“His caricatures reveal the truths of living in a society made up of different races, religions, cultures, and languages,” said Sultan Nazrin.

He said Mohd Nor sees the differences between people as a national asset and treasure of immense value, emphasising the shared experiences of a multiethnic society.

“He emphasises the shared experiences of these multiethnic members of society, from the joy felt in wedding ceremonies to the exuberance of festive celebrations, to being in a school environment or getting caught in traffic jams, to enjoying food at a restaurant, among others,” said Sultan Nazrin.

This is what makes Malaysia special and unique. As one news article in the New Straits Times rightly described, Lat’s hilarious cartoons have illustrated and even lampooned Malaysia’s social and political scenes.

Lat has been able to feature the ‘’Malaysiana’’ which we ‘’long for – where times were simpler and people were kinder to each other”, and ‘’he represented the kind of Malaysia we seem to be missing these days.’’

Writer Elena Koshy rightly said it was a time ‘’when friendships were forged beyond the barriers of race, religion, or politics,’’ and perhaps it was a time when we didn’t allow politicians to hijack our political direction.

Our Founding Fathers were more progressive, open-minded and moderate, for sure.

As many of us lose faith in our politicians, we can only turn to our Rulers.

Not everyone of the Rulers has spoken up, at least not openly and publicly. Perhaps mindful of their limited roles as constitutional monarchs, the country hopes they will instil common sense in the politicians.

But the Sultan of Selangor and the Sultan of Johor have certainly been consistent. Both have endeared themselves to Malaysia for their readiness to speak up on issues espoused by certain religious figures.

While they are the Malay Rulers, and guardians of Islam, most of us, the non-Muslims, also see them as our protectors when our rights have been impinged on or threatened.

Although the royal institutions date back to the feudal era, our Rulers have shown they are much more progressive than our politicians, who have lost the plot.

MUDA Goes Solo with Syed Saddiq

 

Nation over politicians


The state election will be a litmus test for the unity government and will determine whether the PKR-DAP-Barisan alliance can work together at grassroots levels. — FAIHAN GHANI/The Star

IT’S doubtless that when the elections in six states take place next month, the battleground between Pakatan Harapan and Perikatan Nasional will be jewel in the crown, Selangor.

As the most important state in the country, the results of the elections there will immensely impact the situation nationwide.

Selangor has been the stronghold of PKR – Pakatan’s lead party – for the last 15 years, or more significantly, three terms.

This time, at stake are 56 state seats, where Pakatan is expected to contest in 43 constituencies with Barisan Nasional doing likewise in 11.

This will be the first time Pakatan and Barisan, following the setting up of the Unity Government, will be working together as former rivals to thwart Perikatan.

While Pakatan still has a grip on the state, it’s evident that the coming state polls will be the fiercest ever. Voters in the Klang Valley, including Selangor, have always been pro-Pakatan, but Perikatan has been able to whittle that support, especially among Malays in the coastal areas.

Perikatan is eyeing capturing the northern part of Selangor, where most of the seats have predominantly Malay voters. The party will even want to make inroads in the southern and urban seats with strong Malay presence.

The coalition of Bersatu, PAS and Gerakan seems convinced that its Malay rights and religious narratives will work – even in Selangor.

The focus will be on Hulu Selangor, Kuala Langat, Tanjung Karang, Sabak Bernam, Sungai Besar and Kapar – all Umno strongholds until the last general election. It’s the 14 state seats that Perikatan will want to capture although not all of them were directly won by the coalition during GE15 because they were the results of split votes among the contenders.

It will be a litmus test for Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim as Prime Minister and the unity government, and will determine whether the PKR-DAP-Barisan alliance can work together at grassroots levels.

Umno president Datuk Seri Dr Zahid Hamidi will also have to prove that he can deliver the crucial Malay votes.


A padi field in Tanjung Karang. This former Umno stronghold is one of the state seats that Perikatan will want to capture in the upcoming polls. — The Star

While there’s consensus at the leadership level, it’s much harder to convince and persuade the working level to campaign, let alone, vote for each other after years of acrimonious relationships.

After all, just over seven months ago, both sides had hurled bitter accusations at each other on the campaign trail and now, they are expected to tell their audience that they need to support each other.

Then, there are the Umno warlords who have been left out, or expelled from Umno, who are more than ready to trade blows with their party bosses for their humiliating exits.

The wounds are still raw, and surely they can’t be blamed for their disinterest in wanting to help their party.

PAS supporters are better at taking orders from their leaders – they had no problems campaigning for DAP under the former Barisan Alternatif pact and for Umno under the Muafakat Nasional pact.

For non-partisan voters with no political allegiance, Anwar and his Cabinet members must work harder to explain to them voter issues like the cost of living and the depreciating ringgit.

The perception now is that only Anwar and a few Pakatan ministers are on the offensive.

Where are the rest of the ministers and top Pakatan leaders who should be pitching in to defend the unity government?

Even worse, some have shot themselves in the foot with their brash and ill-advised remarks and actions. Perikatan has been quick to catch them and strike, and that’s expected at this juncture.

Silence is clearly golden for the government appointed Islamic scholars against PAS, which suggests they fear challenging the Islamist party.

PAS leaders have gained ground among sections of Malays where Pakatan has compromised Malay interests because of DAP, and now, the red lines have been crossed as the politics of fear are being whipped up.

It may seem unbelievable but there are enough Malay voters who believe their interests are being challenged.

At the social media level, even PAS scholars have learnt fast and furiously as they, or their team, have bombarded TikTok with their daily messages to reach young voters.

As part of the psychological warfare, both sides have come up with purported surveys. It isn’t likely that Kedah will fall into Pakatan hands and likewise, Selangor and Penang will probably retain the status quo.

In both states, many of the seats are mixed or Chinese-majority, with the Malay-majority seats centred on Penang’s mainland, while in Selangor, there are about 30 Malay areas from the 56 seats.

In Penang, there are 40 seats with PKR holding 12, DAP 19 and Amanah two with Umno. Both Perikatan and PAS had one each, with four Bersatu state assemblymen who got booted out.

There are possible dents by Perikatan this time in these two states, but it will be difficult to dislodge Pakatan.

A pre-election survey among Malay voters in Selangor found there is no significant vote transferability between Pakatan and Barisan.

According to a study done in March by Marzuki Mohamad and Khairul Syakirin Zulkifli – published by the ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute – Malay voters are more likely to transfer their votes from Barisan to Perikatan candidates instead of Pakatan candidates.

A good turn-out by Chinese voters is crucial in this state polls. The community has a history of low turnout in by-elections, but their presence could be crucial here. Out-of-state and overseas voters also won’t be motivated to return home to cast their votes but will do so via postal ballots.

This certainly won’t be an ordinary state poll, but it will be fought as fiercely as in a general election. Expect the political temperature to shoot up as race and religion come into play. While the police have given ample warnings that the 3Rs – race, religion and royalty – are taboo, it’s most likely that these errant politicians will snub our police.

But it will come at a grave cost to Malaysians if this is the chosen approach.

The interests of the nation and its people are invariably more important than the selfish ambitions of the politicians.

Rewriting history the Mahathir way

A once-respected leader wants Malaysia pushed back into the dark ages.

TUN Dr Mahathir Mohamad may have forgotten, but a little over 30 years ago, the then prime minister announced a grand vision to raise Malaysia to be a developed country by 2020.

To achieve that, he drew up a nine-point plan. Topping the list of his Wawasan 2020 objectives was to set up a united Malaysian nation made up of one Bangsa Malaysia.

He also wanted to turn our country into a mature, liberal and tolerant society. The other pillars included creating a liberated, secure and developed Malaysian society.

He also announced his intention of fostering a mature democratic society and ensuring an economically just society where there’s a fair and equitable distribution of the nation’s wealth.

They were lofty ideals, but it’s fair to say that Malaysia, which had impressive economic growth then, really believed it was possible.

No one would argue that the vision Dr Mahathir had painted of a united, liberal Malaysia, where every race enjoyed the country’s success, almost seemed Utopian.

In fact, in his book The Way Forward, he outlines in five essays that for Malaysia to develop, it needs growth, prosperity and multiracial harmony.

But today, we hear a different narrative from the now 97-year-old politician.

Instead of bringing the nation together, he has metaphorically shown signs of bigotry by insisting on playing the politics of fear.

Multiculturalism is now a dirty word to him, and Bangsa Malaysia is like a leaf from DAP’s Malaysian Malaysia, and surely that must be stopped.

Oh, how forgetful Dr Mahathir has become.

If his plan is to be in the news by creating controversies, then he has succeeded, but it has, unfortunately, put the country in a bad light and helped push ugly, divisive and racial politics to the forefront.

It’s incredible that he’s prepared to work with religious extremists, whom he has constantly criticised for decades, to topple the present unity government.

Interestingly, Dr Mahathir had also worked with some of the main component parties in the government.

He defended DAP even before he became the PM the second time around after Pakatan Harapan ended the 60-year reign of the Barisan Nasional/Alliance Federal Government in 2018.

Dr Mahathir loudly proclaimed that DAP had been unfairly demonised.

In a statement made in September 2016, he was quoted as saying that he was “wrong about the party”, pointing out that “DAP’s party song is in the national language and the conference is also conducted in the national language through and through”.

“I see members from different racial backgrounds attending the conference here today. DAP is not a Chinese-only party today but a multiracial one,” he said.

Dr Mahathir has now blamed DAP entirely for the collapse of the Pakatan government, which lasted barely 22 months in 2020, interestingly again, due to his resignation as PM.

No one from Pakatan attempted to oust him, as he wants to believe now. He chose to resign, which Bersatu president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin has consistently maintained.

Muhyiddin has said that it was Dr Mahathir who had opted to pull the party out of the Pakatan coalition when the latter was the chairman and had made a “U-turn at the last minute when the Pakatan presidential council, in its Feb 21, 2020 meeting, made the decision to support him (Dr Mahathir) as PM”.

Now, we hear Dr Mahathir is seeking a political pact with Muhyiddin. So much for principles, but of course this time it’s “to save the Malays”.

An angry Dr Mahathir had vowed that he would never work with those who “stabbed him in the back” – meaning Muhyiddin and others – but three years down the road, both are reportedly sitting together to fight Pakatan.

Enough is said of the past, though. The most regrettable part of our current political discourse is that our politicians have kept talking about the past with their distorted interpretations of history.

It started with Kedah Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Muhammad Sanusi Md Nor claiming Penang belongs to Kedah, and now Dr Mahathir is claiming it is unconstitutional to promote Malaysia as a multiracial country.

The narrative is simple – Malays are under siege, there is a need to save them, and the non-Malays are to blame.

There will be enough of the Malay electorate who will subscribe to these politics out of fear that the present government is being held ransom by the Chinese-led DAP, which wants to remove Malay rights and Islam.

It may be simplistic, but these are powerful and effective arguments to win votes in the Malay heartland.

In a fiery ceramah by PAS leaders in both urban and rural areas, they won’t be challenged to explain how that could be possible when bumiputra make up 69.9% of the 32.2 million population, with the Chinese only comprising 22.8% and Indians 6.6%.

The question is this – how could non-Malays be a threat when we are incapable of even reproducing ourselves fast enough to boost our numbers? For the last six decades since our independence, non-Malays have accepted this and lived with the political equation of race in this country.

This is not going to change.

Almost the entire two million-plus civil servants are Malays, while all the mentris besar and chief ministers, save for Penang, are Malays. In Parliament, of the 222 MPs, 131 are Malays and 24 are Muslim bumiputra.

It’s often said that politics is dirty, but we are seeing politics at its lowest ebb in this country, where race and religion are being dangerously wielded to win votes at all costs.

We need Malaysians to talk about the future and how we can be economically strong, progressive, united, competitive and highly regarded in the eyes of the world, very much like what Dr Mahathir had envisaged in his Wawasan 2020.

Malaysia needs the talent and resourcefulness of all Malaysians, regardless of their race, to make it work. Our competition is the world. Not against each other.

Unfortunately, and very sadly, in his twilight years, the once respected leader wants Malaysia pushed back into the dark ages.

Wronging for our rights

IF we are expecting PAS to leave non-Muslims alone to practise their own lifestyles, then we must be naïve.

The Kota Baru Municipal Council has agreed to cancel the fine imposed on a non-Muslim boutique owner for “indecent” attire after a discussion with the Local Government Department director-general.

“The woman should not have paid the fine, as she may have been misled to do so. She wore shorts in her own shop, which sells shorts,” Local Government Development Minister Nga Kor Ming told a press conference yesterday.

However, the council’s severe action, according to the interpretation of its enforcement officer, isn’t the first.

Previously, unisex hair salons in the PAS-run state had been penalised for opening their doors to both genders. The authorities have imposed separate check-outs in its supermarkets and cinemas have long been shut down.

For those of us outside of Kelantan, we can protest our hearts out at this form of overreaction, but the reality is that the officer was reportedly acting within his rights.

After all, it has been reported that there is the Kelantan Business and Industrial Trade By-Laws 2019, under Section 34 (2) (b), which stipulates that non-Muslim business licensees must ensure they and their non-Muslim workers wear decent clothes. If their employees are Muslims, they should wear attire covering their aurat (modesty).

The trouble is the criteria for modest dressing, in the eyes of PAS leaders and even the security guards at our government offices, are always different.

In the latest case, a woman was stopped by a Rela member from entering a Socso office in Penang for “indecent dressing”.


Over-reaction?: A boutique owner was fined for ‘indecent’ attire for wearing shorts at her shop in Kota Baru last Sunday. — Facebook/Others

Fortunately, Socso issued a statement on Friday to set the record straight that there were no instructions given by its management to bar visitors from entering its Penang office because of their attire.

And just two weeks ago, the PAS MP for Kuantan took issue with nurses’ uniform. Almost all our Muslim nurses in hospitals wear slacks and headscarves but to this PAS MP, it is still not enough. He finds their uniforms provocative, weird as it may sound.

I have a reader who sends me critical emails on a regular basis. Nothing wrong with disagreeing voices as discourse, especially constructive criticism, is healthy. No one, especially public figures, is spared from scrutiny.

Like some of my peers, I have lodged police reports when threats were received. And legal letters were dispatched when defamatory remarks were made.

But in most cases, we chose to ignore such critics, who seemed to have plenty of time or need mental help.

In fact, most journalists consider it a hazard of scribes. If we wish to pen critical pieces, then we must also be prepared to come under the microscope.

This person, who hides behind a pseudonym in his emails, would call me all sorts of names but has never taken up my challenge that he rebuts my comments with an intelligent, substantive, and persuasive argument.

Recently, he criticised my article on the subject of nurses’ attire. In his support of the PAS MP, he sent a link which showed that nurses were all covered up in the United Kingdom – except that it was an illustration of nurses during the Victorian age!

Some simple detective work revealed the regular critic to be a chemistry professor at a public university in Kuala Lumpur.

But the point is this. While we have a right to different opinions and it must be respected, it is something else when supposedly learned people holding high positions in institutions send anonymous, cryptic messages with bizarre and even defamatory messages which sounds threatening.

We have come to a point where enforcement officers and the “pak guard” at government buildings carry out their duties without any respect for the rights of non-Muslims under the Federal Constitution.

It has gone to ridiculous lengths, pardon the pun. In many cases, we are not even talking about non-Muslim women wearing mini-skirts or pants but proper skirts, which were deemed improper.

In February, a businesswoman was barred from using the elevator at the Pasir Gudang Municipal Council for improper dressing although the hemline of her dress reached her mid-calf.

“I’m a 60-year-old woman. It does not make sense for me to dress scantily or wear inappropriate clothing in public,” she was quoted as saying in The Star.

These are other cases where common sense was not used. A woman, who was in shorts, wanted to lodge a report about an accident at the Kajang police station on Jan 30. She was told to change into something “more appropriate” before she was allowed entry.

Just two weeks after the controversy, news emerged that a woman was scolded by a medical worker at Hospital Kampar for being “indecently dressed”.

Nobody wants to go to a hospital unless it’s necessary, so it was commendable of the Health Minister to speak out against it, but in many other cases, the superiors seem defensive or protective of their own staff.

Even the guys are not spared.

Seven men wearing shorts in Tanah Merah, Kelantan, were given warning by the Kelantan Islamic Religious Affairs Department in March. Deputy Mentri Besar Datuk Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah said that Muslim men should not wear clothes that expose their knees. Shorts are okay but they must cover the knees, he said.

And over in Terengganu, the state government has remained firm on its ban on unisex hair salons. Those who break the gender-segregation rule can be fined between RM500 and RM1,000.

After 66 years of independence, there is rising concern among people that the plural Malaysia that we know of is losing its moderate identity.

While we have grown accustomed to the use of race and religion during elections, the tone this time is much more unsettling.

Non-Muslims have every reason to fear that their rights and welfare are being jeopardised.

Their perception is that not many Muslim national leaders, regardless of their affiliations, are prepared to speak up for the minorities now as the fight for the crucial predominant Malay votes heats up.

The coming state polls in six states may not change the position of the Federal Government but Malaysians in these states have a responsibility to send the right message about the Malaysia that they want to protect.

Convenience’s sake


Equal partners?: (From left) PAS president Tan Sri Abdul Hadi Awang, Bersatu president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin and Lau holding a press conference after the coalition’s meeting on seat allocation for the upcoming state elections at Perikatan‘s headquarters. Gerakan can only bargain if it has sufficient clout to balance out PAS, says the writer. — YAP CHEE HONG/The Star

IT’S going to be a tough state election for Gerakan, the only multiracial partner in the mainly Malay-Muslim platform Perikatan Nasional, since the two main partners, Bersatu and PAS, are mono-ethnic.

Gerakan looks like an odd bedfellow. Its philosophy and principles contrast with what Bersatu and PAS preach.

When its party president Datuk Dr Dominic Lau sits among PAS leaders decked in their robes and skull caps, he must surely feel out of place.

He will be testing his luck in the Bukit Tengah state seat of Penang in the coming state polls.

It’s a racially mixed seat with a composition of 47.33% Chinese, 35.5% Malays, 16.7% Indians, 0.8% East Malaysians and 0.18% constituting others.

In the 2018 state polls, Pakatan Harapan’s Gooi Hsiao Loong from PKR won the seat with a 8,558 majority in a five-way contest. PAS managed only 2,355 votes.

In 2013, PKR’s Ong Chin Wen beat Barisan Nasional’s Teng Chang Yeow of Gerakan with a 5,190-vote majority.

Lau will be vying to get all the votes from PAS, the discontented Malay votes and the disgruntled Umno ballots, who can’t accept working with DAP. If he succeeds, then he may just pull through.

The strong showing of Perikatan, especially PAS, in the predominantly Malay electorate on the mainland in 2022, must have emboldened him, with all the expectations of a green wave continuing its course at the state polls.

After all, if a big name like Nurul Izzah Anwar can be defeated by an unknown PAS ulamak, Muhammad Fawwaz Mat Jan, with a majority of 5,272 votes, Lau must be hedging his bets on having a fighting chance with the Malay votes.

As political analyst Mustafa Anuar rightly wrote, “Lau’s confidence also seems to derive from the personal conviction of Perikatan chairman Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin that the opposition could win ‘nearly 20’ state seats to gain a simple majority in the 40-seat Penang state legislative assembly.

Lau has nothing to lose except his image and pride. After all, he has lost twice consecutively, while trying to capture the Batu parliamentary constituency in Kuala Lumpur in the 2013 and 2018 general elections.

Those old enough to have seen Gerakan trounce the Alliance in 1969 through the dynamism of the late Tun Dr Lim Cheng Eu, and the eventual end of Gerakan by DAP in 2008, would know the reign of the Penang-based party is over.

Lau is almost anonymous in Penang, a state where voters expect to always see and hear their politicians. It’s not a walk in the park, but that’s how it works in parochial Penang.

Gerakan not only lost in the polls, but also failed to challenge DAP imports like Lim Kit Siang, Lim Guan Eng and Dr P. Ramasamy, who aren’t even Penangites. At least Penang Chief Minister Chow Kon Yeow studied and worked in Penang.

Chow studied at Universiti Sains Malaysia and worked as a journalist in the now defunct English daily National Echo in Penang, before taking the plunge into politics full-time in the 1990s.

Gerakan has yet to produce a leader capable of making a dent in the DAP armour. Even less enviable, it must now play a token presence in Perikatan with emphasis on race and religion. When PAS lawmakers make the most outrageous remarks, Gerakan seems prepared to look the other way, and pretend the cat was never put among the pigeons, and if it were, would slink away.

There are the obligatory responses to PAS, mostly by insignificant Gerakan leaders, whose voices are invariably meek. None of them are prepared to oppose the extreme stand taken by PAS leaders. Put simply, Gerakan has lost all respect and dignity from its base, likely also including its members in Penang who’ve seen better days.

The party is adrift and rudderless. It serves only Bersatu and PAS, who want to project some semblance of a multi-racial Malaysia.

Some have justified that PAS isn’t extreme and that the green wave isn’t real, but merely a manifestation of a discontent Malay electorate which has no one to vote against Barisan.

While there may be some truth, it’s hard to convince non-Malays and progressive Malays that PAS isn’t bigoted since its pronouncements and stand on religious and racial divisiveness are clearly against plural Malaysia. As some PKR and Umno leaders say, it isn’t Islam, but PAS.

Yes, it’s true that politics is about winning power. Gerakan can only bargain if it has sufficient clout to balance out PAS.

But Gerakan should start earning respect and stand up against race and religious narratives which are tearing up Malaysia.

Scripting their love story for the big screen


Life on the big screen: Rachel (left) with Condor.

KUALA LUMPUR: She has been away in the United States for the last 12 years raising a family, but Malaysia remains in the heart of Rachel Tan who is now a producer of the romantic comedy Worth The Wait.

She is back in Malaysia to wrap up the production of the movie which was filmed in Vancouver and Kuala Lumpur.

The cast included Lana Condor (To All the Boys film series), Ross Butler (Shazam! franchise), Sung Kang (Fast and Furious franchise), Andrew Koji (Bullet Train), Elodie Yung (The Cleaning Lady), Tan Kheng Hua (Crazy Rich Asians) and multiple Golden Horse Awards winner Karena Ka-yan Lam (Zinnia Flower, The White Storm).

“I am truly privileged to be one of the producers together with my husband, Dan Mark,’’ she said in an interview.

The movie features the story of a long-distance relationship that spanned Kuala Lumpur and the United States, as experienced by Rachel and her American-born Chinese boyfriend, now her husband.


Rachel at 20 when she was newly-crowned Miss Chinese International. — Photos courtesy of Rachel Tan’s Instagram and AP

She said Condor and Butler were brought to Kuala Lumpur to take in the sights and sounds of the city to ensure authenticity.

While Vancouver was picked as the setting for Seattle, the American city in the movie, the team insisted on a Kuala Lumpur location.

“Our stories are inspired by our experiences in love as teenagers, in our 20s and 30s, and trying for a baby after marriage. It also involves my sister’s story,’’ she added.

Rachel, a University of Cambridge-trained lawyer, was also a beauty queen, winning the Miss Chinese International pageant in Hong Kong in 2003.

The Seremban-born entrepreneur is now settled in Los Angeles, running an entertainment law firm with her husband Mark, who was previously an attorney at Warner Bros.

Rachel and Mark wrote the preliminary script of the movie. They are both “thrilled to pieces that our names are on the credit line.’’

Kheng Hua, a Singaporean, introduced them to award-winning Taiwanese director Tom Shu-yu Lin.

“We raised the funds for the movie from Asian Americans in Silicon Valley and also on Wall Street with our producing partners.

“We brought in this amazing talent who loved the script and shot most of it in Vancouver and wrapped up the shooting within five days in KL,’’ she added.

Rachel and Mark said they have always loved romantic comedies like Love Actually and were excited to share their own take on the genre with an all-Asian cast and script “inspired by our own love story, our family and different stages of our lives.”

“We feel honoured for our labour of love to be part of this incredible moment that Asian Americans are having in cinema right now.’’

Rachel said she looked up to Oscar-winning actress Tan Sri Michelle Yeoh, adding that she was pleased to see a Malaysian triumphing at the Academy Awards.

Malaysia, she said, is etched in her heart.

In fact, the country is a compulsory stop for her family especially for her children, aged eight and one-and-a-half, during summer holidays.

“We just spent time in Langkawi,’’ she said.