As I walked along the corridors, memories of my
schooldays came flooding back. My daughter then asked why many features at SXI
were not found in her school.

She was fascinated by the chapel, the statues of La
Salle brothers and the energetic school band playing nostalgic tunes
such as the Saints Go Marching In.

Although we grew up together in SXI, in many ways we had
become strangers over the years. But we left behind our jaded spirits and over
the course of that evening we exchanged memories and naughty jokes of time
together in school.

While many of us now have expanded waistlines and
receding hairlines, our former teachers seemed to look the same.

Many of them could not recognise or remember us, as we
were neither the brightest nor the most notorious, but we were certainly
thankful to them for the education they gave us.

They were good teachers, with a sense of mission and
dedication. They had studied in SXI and eventually became teachers in their
alma mater. Even after having retired from the school, they continued to play a
role there.

The Christian brothers who taught us – many of them are
still around – instilled in us a sense of discipline. Although they did not
spare the rod, most of us are thankful to them.

Despite the many strokes of the rotan meted out, we always
felt that the punishment was justified.

One friend was still complaining about a certain
discipline teacher who slapped him in the face for no apparent reason. Until
today, he still cannot forgive the teacher.

But that was the difference between the Christian
brothers and the other teachers.

The school has certainly produced many prominent figures
such as former Penang Chief Minister the late Tan Sri Wong Pow Nee, former KL
Datuk Bandar Tan Sri Kamarulzaman Zainal and lawyer Karpal Singh, who sent his
children to study there as well.

SXI, like St Michael's Institution in Ipoh
and Victoria Institution in Kuala Lumpur,
were premier schools. Today, most have probably lost their shine.

Previously, most parents who studied in these schools
would send their children there as tradition – until the Education Ministry
began to place students in schools according to their addresses.

The academic performances of these schools, in some ways,
have dipped because the students would now come from a particular area. Some
schools, located in more affluent areas, have fared better because of the
advantages these students enjoyed and this had helped boost the school's exam
results.

But for many of us who walked out the gates of SXI on
finishing our secondary school, we will always hold our heads high because we
are the sons of St Xavier's.

For now, Lim Boo Chang (Datuk Kramat) and Tan Cheng Liang
(Jawi) are not entitled to enjoy the benefits and support of the MCA as
independent representatives.

More hurting to their self-esteem would be the sitting
arrangements at the State Assembly – they would likely have to sit with the
opposition members.

While some politicians have continuously called for the
two to be expelled, the decision to suspend them indefinitely is possibly the
most practical option.

If a fixed suspension was made, it may not satisfy some
Barisan leaders who reckon that a harsher punishment should be meted out.

Let's not be too quick in calling for their sacking. It
should be noted that to be suspended indefinitely, the two Penang MCA leaders
could still harbour hopes of being accepted into the MCA. That is only possible
if they abide by the rules of the coalition.

They can be sure that their actions, particularly at the
State Assembly, will be closely watched by Barisan leaders, including the Prime
Minister and his deputy.

If the two were to be expelled, the MCA would have more
difficulty in influencing them.

There are some politicians who feel that sacking the two
would send a message to other parties, arguing that the structure of Barisan is
of utmost importance, but others may simply want it for political expediency
and to make the MCA less vocal.

Amidst the controversy, we seem to have forgotten that
Barisan has lost out because it now has two representatives less.

The message of the duo's suspension is loud and clear
-Barisan will not tolerate any form of dissent among its ranks. To disagree is
one thing but to be openly defiant is unacceptable.

Component parties must understand that they rely on one
another.

Although Barisan assemblymen were elected because of
concerted efforts by all component parties, the popularity of these
personalities are equally important factors, even if we feel that there is no
shortage of people aspiring to be Barisan candidates.

Penang Island
is a small place and the popularity of a politician among the grassroots does
make a difference. Many young people may not have heard of C.Y. Choy but the
former Socialist Front mayor retained the Pengkalan Kota state seat for several
terms as an independent candidate.

Gerakan politicians, in their white short-sleeved shirts,
are known for their humble approach and ability to interact with the people
while their MCA counterparts are seen as grassroots workers moving around their
constituencies on motorcycles.

Penangites expect their assemblymen to speak up for them.
That explains why the bulk of active non-government organisations such as the
Consumer Association of Penang and Aliran come from the state.

Boo Chang and Cheng Liang obviously irked the state
Gerakan leaders who must have felt that they went overboard in their criticism.
Then, there is the political equation between MCA and Gerakan.

While the two politicians have been punished, the PORR
issue – the root cause of the controversy – still remains. Penangites must
accept the fact that their island needs a traffic dispersal scheme.

It cannot be denied that driving in Penang
is a nightmare and the problems are piling up every day. For a project of such proportions,
houses would naturally have to be demolished to make way.

Penangites, in general, have no quarrel with traffic
dispersal projects but they want more details, including how toll will be
collected and the extent of the socio-economic impact.

It would help allay the people's apprehension if more
information is forthcoming, especially now that the state government has
admitted it would be one of the most expensive traffic projects. Penangites
cannot be blamed if they fear that the financial burden would eventually be
passed to them as users.

If the state government feels that it need not take a
populist approach on the PORR because the long-term benefits are more
important, then it should adopt a more pro-active approach.

First, it needs to win the support of a large number of
the Barisan assemblymen and, second, find out why a large section of Penangites
are not comfortable with the project.

The Penang government should take
a leaf from other state leaders. In Selangor, Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Khir
Toyo went to Puchong to speak to residents who had protested against the
building of a market on their football field – and scrapped the project on the
spot.

In Johor, Umno politicians helped 10,000 residents,
mostly wage earners, who had received notices to vacate their homes to make way
for a new Customs, Immigration and Quarantine complex.

And the Cabinet relocated the RM1.5bil garbage
incinerator following protests from residents.

In the case of the PORR, the affected residents have
approached Barisan assemblymen, both from Gerakan and the MCA, because they
feel only Barisan has the clout to respond positively.

That is the best compliment Penang Barisan can have – and
the coalition must live up to the expectations of their voters.

The Sultan, who has won support for his reforms, also
decided that there would be no recipient for the Justice of Peace award. JPs
are often regarded as second-class magistrates.

Over the past one week, the media has continued to report
on the steps taken by him to improve the standing of the royal household while
full-page interviews have been published in the run-up to his official
birthday.

The Sultan had earlier announced he had revoked the
Datukship of two businessmen and that his royal household would limit the
number of Datuks to 40 a year. It is understood that the Sultan and Mentri
Besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohamed Khir Toyo personally vetted the list of 300
nominations for Datukship.

The message from the Sultan was clear: Work for these
titles. These titles are not for sale.

According to a state official, the Sultan had all the
background information of the 300 names, including the political standing of
some Umno leaders recommended for the title and whether they were qualified to
be Datuks.

Many nominations submitted by top Barisan Nasional
leaders for the titles were struck off by the Sultan despite the
recommendations of these politicians.

"He surprised us with his knowledge of these nominees. In
some cases, he dismissed the perceived influence and contributions of these
nominees, saying they were not ready to be Datuks. He really did his homework,"
said the official.

The action of the Sultan has even attracted the attention
of the Singapore Straits Times which reported "when the ruler of Selangor
voiced his disquiet recently over the quality and quantity of Datuks, he was
speaking on behalf of many Malaysians" as many Malaysians had made "snide
remarks that the titles could be bought."

Earlier, Mingguan Malaysia,
in its editorial, had questioned how unknowns, in their 30s, were made Datuks
and what these people could have achieved at such a young age.

Last week, the Malay Mail provided the breakdown of
Datukships conferred – the figures for Kelantan and Sabah are for 2002, and the
rest for 2001: Johor (1), Kedah (40), Kelantan (25), Negri Sembilan (55),
Pahang (105), Perak (60), Perlis (20), Selangor (90), Terengganu (20), Malacca
(60), Penang (59), Sabah (55), Sarawak (12) and Federal Government (43).

It is good that the media has continued to give attention
to the issue because serious steps must be taken to ensure that the honour is
not diluted. Datukships have a long history as they were used as early as 1400,
during the Malacca Sultanate, to refer to people with high standing in society.

The Datukships as a conferred title began in 1800s,
during the British colonial era, when the state of Malaya
adopted the various constitutions. Since then, it has been a tradition that the
rulers and Yang di-Pertuan Negri confer Datukships of varying ranks – such as
Datuk Seri, Datuk Paduka, Datuk Wira, Datuk Panglima and Datuk – on Malaysians
on their official birthdays.

The general consensus among Malaysians, including those
who are Datuks, is that it's time the Council of Rulers give serious thought to
drawing up a guideline on the rewarding and revocation of Datukships, including
those convicted of criminal offences.

It should also be an offence for Malaysians who use
titles not conferred by the rulers of Malaysia
on their documents and that the authorities must insist on proof from people
who want to use this as a prefix to their names.

One local Chinese magazine recently reported that a
businessman from Johor managed to include his Datukship title, conferred by the
so-called Sultan of Solo, in his passport.

We are not sure whether the report is accurate but, if it
is true, then the Immigration Department must investigate the matter.

There is certainly a need to limit the number of titles
given in order to maintain their prestige and value.

As the people of Selangor celebrate the birthday of their
new Sultan over the weekend, they would be doing so with renewed pride.

Expressing his support for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr
Mahathir Mohamad's directive to all banks to provide loans to small
entrepreneurs, Abu Bakar said only a few banks had been helpful.

On Thursday, Dr Mahathir said the Government had to issue
this directive because local banks were not interested in providing small loans
despite the availability of funds.

Dr Mahathir said that while banks felt it was more
profitable to provide big loans, small businessmen were to be blamed too as
they sometimes failed to service their loans.

The Finance Minister, in his Hari Raya message over
television, urged businessmen to be more responsible in repaying bank loans.

Over the past one week, newspapers have carried plenty of
news about the ways of loan sharks, and Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri
Abdullah Ahmad Badawi came out to say the government had directed the police to
investigate the operations of these shady characters.

Abdullah said he was saddened over an incident in
Seremban last week where a couple and their four-year-old son died three days
after they swallowed paraquat to escape harassment by loan sharks.

While there are businessmen who turn to loan sharks for
quick loans to tide over a financial hitch, there are Malaysians who seek such
loans to repay their gambling debts.

These gamblers know the consequences, particularly the
high interest and the possibility of being beaten for failing to pay up.

Then there are those who have committed themselves to
these loan sharks because they live beyond their means and not because they
have business loans to worry about.

While newspapers have run advertisements from licensed
moneylenders – we should not equate them to loan sharks – the latter have been
brave enough to put up notices in busy areas such as Puduraya. According to the
Housing and Local Government Ministry, there are about 2,000 licensed
moneylenders.

Abdullah has correctly said that the people, especially
those from the lower-income group, should go to financial institutions set up
by the Government.

He said the Government had many schemes, such as the Tekun
programme and Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia,
where traders could apply for loans for their business activities.

Political parties, trade associations and non-government
organisations should work together to publish a list of financial institutions
and agencies that offer such loans.

The media could also play its role by publishing such a
list with information on how the lower-income could apply for these loans. It
would go a long way in helping ordinary folk.

Moves should be made to encourage Malaysians to join
cooperatives where they can apply for quick loans to overcome their financial
difficulties.

The Government and the police should act first to plug
the loopholes as loan sharks are said to be well connected and influential.

Amendments to the Money-Lending Ordinance 1951 are
necessary to give police specific powers to act against loan sharks because the
authorities have no specific laws to turn to at present. With these amendments,
the police would be able to investigate, arrest and charge persons for loan
sharking.

It is necessary to look at these loopholes because we do
not want suspected loan sharks to get off the hook on legal technicalities.

There is an urgent need to protect ordinary people who
turn to loan sharks out of desperation but at the same time, more information
must be made available at public places, such as pasar malam and community
centres, on how they can obtain easy loans from authorised agencies.

More powers must be given to the police and the courts,
including custodial sentence and whipping, to weed out these "sharks" that
cruise the sea of desperation.

Barely 24 hours later, a developer from Malacca, who was
appointed a Justice of the Peace last month, allegedly brandished his pistol at
a motorist after a minor misunderstanding.

The case of the two businessmen should serve as an
eye-opener to other title-holders, reminding them of the need to behave
properly, in accordance with the dignity of the title.

It is hoped that the Sultan of Selangor's decision will
be emulated by his fellow rulers as only the Sultan or Yang di-Pertua Negri can
revoke a title, award or medal conferred on an individual.

Honours and awards must be taken seriously because these
decorations are a part of our rich tradition. These awards, which date back to
the Malacca Sultanate period, are only bestowed on the official birthday of the
King or state rulers.

The investiture is conducted by the King or the rulers in
person in the presence of the Prime Minister or Mentri Besar, reflecting the
importance of the occasion. These awards are conferred on Malaysians who are
deemed to have contributed to the state or country.

But over the years, many Malaysians have felt that the
Conference of Rulers should give greater thought to the awarding of these
titles to protect their prestige.

Any person who has been convicted, for example, should
not be allowed to keep his Datukship. It makes a mockery of the system when a
person is still referred to as Yang Berbahagia or addressed as Datuk when he is
behind bars or had been jailed.

Similarly, those who have fled the country because they
are being sought by police should have their titles revoked. After all, if
these Datuks have nothing to hide, there is no reason for them to run from the
law.

In fact, the police and Official Assignee should screen
the background of those nominated for Datukship, JPs and other awards.

There should also be a limit to the number of Datukship
given out each year to maintain its prestige as well as an age limit for
recipients.

The general sentiment among Malaysians is that there are
too many Datuks, especially titled businessmen whose contributions may just be
their financial commitment to charities.

Lately, we have read of impatient businessmen who
allegedly buy their Datukship from dubious rulers from Mindanao
in the Philippines.
The conferment of these titles is held at hotel function rooms and there
appears to be no shortage of businessmen who are prepared to pay for these
medals, although they are not recognised officially.

As it is not an offence to put a Datuk honorific on their
business cards, these businessmen are ready to be thick-faced about it. After
all, not everyone would check the authenticity of these titles.

The Sultan of Selangor is also angry with motorists who
display fraudulent state crests and has asked the Road Transport Department to
check on this.

It is a timely move as we now see motorists displaying
all kinds of crests and emblems, from so-called shooting clubs to youth clubs,
on their vehicles. Some of these clubs could be non-existent.

In the past, only members of the Bar Council, Members of
Parliament, assemblymen and Datuks are allowed to display these crests, which
are registered by the various organisations. The state councils of Datuks keep
a register of the various vehicles approved to use these crests.

If that's not enough, it is now a norm to see stickers on
most cars, supposedly representing Bukit Aman or the Ex-Policemen's
Association. Perhaps these people assume that the police will not summon them
if they commit a traffic offence.

While the Sultan of Selangor did not address the position
of JPs, many Malaysians have questioned the basis of awarding this title, which
is recognised in all Commonwealth countries.

The JPs, who have the authority of second-class
magistrates, are expected to be noble people with some standing – and education
– in the community.

Age and financial standing alone should no longer be the
main criteria. We expect our JPs to have a sound education, preferably a
university degree, so they can perform their duties effectively.

The Sultan of Selangor may be the newest ruler but he has
shown he is responsive to the people's feelings.

Although he has to work during the festive season, the
Kedah-born policeman tries to hold his makan session at his Putrajaya home,
located within the Sri Perdana complex, a week after Hari Raya.

Roslan and his wife simply serve the best laksa and beef
rendang I have ever tasted. This could probably be vouched for by the staff of
the Prime Minister and Dr Mahathir himself.

As a northerner myself, we like our laksa hot and spicy
with a generous dose of otak udang, the thick black prawn paste that can be
found only in Kedah, Perlis and Penang.

As a Malaysian, I count myself very lucky to be born in
this country as Malaysia's
multi-racial setting has blessed us with so many traditions and festivals.

In fact, Malaysia
must have the largest number of public holidays, reflecting the government's
recognition of these ethnic holidays. In most Western countries, despite
professing multi-culturalism, these important celebrations are ignored.

Regardless of our religion, these festivals have become a
truly Malaysian affair. We open the doors of our homes, not just to friends but
total strangers, without any fear.

The festivity becomes even more unique and meaningful
when Hari Raya and Chinese New Year coincide, giving birth to the new term
"Kongsi Raya" which means the sharing of celebrations.

This year, Hari Raya and Christmas will be celebrated in
December, which is certainly wonderful and should be emphasised by Malaysians
who truly believe in racial tolerance.

Malaysian newspapers have correctly pointed out that in
some shopping complexes, the owners appeared to have put up Christmas
decorations ahead of the Hari Raya festival.

It is certainly an insensitive act as the managements of
these errant shopping malls – although the number is admittedly small – should
instead have promoted and emphasised the double celebrations.

The managements of these shopping malls may not have
realised their actions have hurt the feelings of Muslims as Hari Raya is
celebrated on a large scale. The media is right to point out this is not the
first time.

Crass commercialism by our businessmen is to be blamed
for this. Within the Chinese community, many of us have long complained about
how the traditional mooncakes have been on sale in the midst of the Hungry
Ghosts Festival. For the traditional minded, it is a pantang because the
Mooncake Festival, which comes a month later, is regarded as a more divine
occasion.

But some politicians have attempted to create a racial
dimension to this slip-up, which I think is unnecessary. The use of harsh
words, in this season of forgiving, is hardly appropriate.

The country needs more Malaysian heroes like Dr Mahathir
and his deputy, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who understand what
compromise and tolerance means.

Malaysians don't want self-seeking political wannabes,
who want to appear like heroes of their communities. For budding politicians
from political youth wings, they certainly need to learn a thing or two from
our true national leaders, if they aspire to bigger roles in national politics.

Over the past one week, there have been statements made
by some politicians and non-governmental organisation leaders without regard
for the feelings of Malaysians.

Statements have been distorted to suit the political
agenda of these personalities without considering the larger interests of this
country.

In the past, such actions may help win votes but
Malaysian politicians have realised that they cannot hope to win elections by
depending on one community as electoral constituencies become more racially
balanced.

It is best that our media, especially the Bahasa Malaysia
and Chinese newspapers, ignore these exchanges which lead to nowhere, except to
raise political temperatures.

Many of these statements certainly do not help to
integrate and unite Malaysians but only divide the country. After celebrating
Deepavali last month, it should be a joy to usher in Hari Raya, Christmas, the
New Year and the Chinese New Year.

If we want to prove a point to the world that we are
"truly Asia" and a showcase of multi-ethnicity, then we
should emphasise on how we have been able to live together for years in the
spirit of unity and tolerance.

There is a need for our budding politicians, who claim to
be role models, to exercise more self-restraint and caution in their choice of
words when making press statements.

It is more important for Malaysians to be able to
celebrate our festivals together, not quarrel over who should celebrate which
festival first in Malaysia.

Roslan's Hari Raya open house, to most officials and
journalists, is simply enjoyable because there is genuine warmth and friendship
among the visitors. The best part is, there are no politicians.

Over the past one-week, queries and doubts have surfaced
over how the national service, which would begin in 2004, would be carried out.

Many of these questions and even criticism on how the
programme would be implemented should be taken in the right spirit by the
authorities as they come from Malaysians who wonder how their children would
cope.

As parents, they are, understandably, worried how the
children would face up to the drills at the camps and how the
character-building programme, to focus on national unity, would affect them.

But parents should not be unduly worried. With two years
more to go, there should be enough time for the government and public to
contribute ideas to make the Malaysian-style national service an effective one.

Instead of taking pot shots at the proposal, before it
even gets started, Malaysians can adopt a positive approach by writing to
newspapers and government on the kind of content they wish to see.

From the statements made by our Cabinet ministers so
far, the national service does not appear to be centred on military drills and
boot camp discipline in army camps, like those in Singapore.

The six-month programme appears to be more like those at
the outward bound camps which emphasise physical and character building,
besides instilling discipline.

It would certainly be good for many city teenagers,
pampered by modern living and their over-protective parents, who let their
domestic maids do most of the chores at home.

Even the activities of uniformed units in schools such as
cadets, scouts, girl guides and Red Crescent today are no longer as vigorous
and interesting as they used to be.

Many schools in the Klang
Valley, for example, are reluctant
to organise outdoor activities, presumably for safety reasons or camping sites
are simply too far away. So, we see boy scouts in KL camping on school fields
instead.

The Cabinet should also ensure that the trainers are
multi-ethnic as the programme is supposed to involve national unity. We should
be realistic enough to accept that racial unity cannot be forged among the
participants within six months, but at least they have a chance to strike up
friendships.

Language, cultural and religious classes should be an
integral part of the programme. After all, language courses are now compulsory
in our local universities.

Participants should not be confined to learning about
their religions but the courses should involve learning the religion of other
communities.

But more importantly, they should be made to appreciate
how the nation's forefathers practised the politics of consensus and moderation
to build the nation.

The young must understand the importance of respecting
the sensitivities of all races in a plural society. Having said that, it is
equally important for the trainers to remember, from the start, that they must
not impose their values and prejudices in these training camps.

These camps should truly reflect the Malaysian setting,
including even the food served, if we are serious about wanting our young to
appreciate each other.

I remember when I was studying in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,
in 1980, how the Chinese students had to go through much red-tape just to
request for halal Chinese food to be served in the canteen.

Despite the support of the student representative
leaders, who were Malays, there were middle-ranking university officials who
attempted to frustrate the petition.

Finally, it was the support of university officials like
Datuk Seri Dr Yusuf Nor, the former Rural Development Minister who was then a
vice-chancellor, which made it possible.

The Cabinet has sensibly included representation from the
main races in the committee set up to implement national service.

One main concern over the implementation is the duration,
with fears that it would disrupt the further studies of students.

This can be resolved by setting the programmes in
components of two months per stint.

I am sure the authorities will allow flexibility in the
implementation of the national service but it must be firm in dealing with
those who attempt to seek exemption on purported medical grounds.

The national service programme deserves the support of
all Malaysians as it aims to foster a sense of belonging and a sense of duty
and responsibility to the nation.

We should ensure that the national service programme does
not end up like Rukun Tetangga and Rakan Muda, where taxpayers' money went down
the drain because of poor planning and response.

Let's give our young people a chance to eat, play, pray
and work together.

There is little doubt that Bush and his Republican Party
made history on Tuesday by emerging from the 2002 mid-term elections
controlling the House of Representatives and Senate.

With the White House under the Republicans already, the
huge victory means that conservative Republicans would also be running the
Supreme Court.

Supreme Court judges are political nominees in the US.
To put in simply, Bush is now in full control of Washington's
power centres over the next two years.

By beating the war drums, Bush successfully proved many
people wrong. It is not always true that the party holding the White House
almost always loses seats in the two Houses.

Never mind if the economy isn't so good and the US
is only starting to recover from the recession. Even all reports of corporate
scandals did not hurt a bit despite the strong political ties between big
business and the Republicans.

The ordinary six-pack Joe, who only watches wrestling and
The Survivor series on TV, will surely understand that transparency and
corporate governance is for banana republics in South-East Asia,
with the exception of the Philippines,
perhaps.

Based on sound political assessment and rational
political analysis, Bush should have been punished and the Democrats should
have maintained or even increase their strength in both Houses.

But these are extraordinary times. It's just a month
after the Sept 11 anniversary and the US
has just won a war in Afghanistan,
transforming Bush into one of the most popular presidents in American history
with approval ratings of over 60%.

The sense of insecurity, aggravated further by the recent
Bali bombings and the Chechen attack in Moscow,
encouraged Americans to rally behind Bush and the other Republican candidates.

The election was not over domestic issues, particularly
the economy, but solely on Bush and his war against terrorism and possibly
against Saddam. Pushed against the wall, the Democrats simply had no answer and
no way of countering the wave of popularity.

Osama may not realise it, or is cursing himself now, but
thanks to him, Bush has become stronger.

Then, there's Saddam. Doesn't it make you wonder why the
Iraqi President has continued to stay in office for so long? Every US
President needs him as a bogeyman to kick around for votes when the economy is
in bad shape.

That's not all. Bush and his allies do not seem to
realise that their insensitive handling of the war against terrorists irked
Muslims all over the world.

Raiding Muslim homes and detaining Muslim suspects,
simply because they keep a beard and wear a turban, have resulted in many
Muslims withdrawing their support for the US.

Even non-Muslims from Asian countries, who are put
through the strict and humiliating immigration and security checks at entry
points, are fuming over this treatment.

The clash of civilisations between the West and Muslim
world, which Osama wanted and was dismissed by many, seems to be turning into
reality at every twist and turn of US diplomacy.

The hawkish stance may help win votes but will not make
the world a better or safer place to live in.

Now that the Republicans are firmly in place, Bush could
perhaps take a step back and, with honesty, examine the root causes of the
hatred against the US.
No one, Muslim or otherwise, would sympathise with terrorists who justify
murders with political and religious reasons.

No one should lose track of the original aim – to improve
the proficiency of the English language among students.

There has never been any dispute over that objective.

Along the way, controversy surfaced when the different
schools of thoughts argued on how the implementation of English to teach the
two subjects should be carried out.

The differences were over methodology and never the
principle of raising the standard of English but unfortunately some politicians
and journalists were confused or chose to confuse the issue, resulting in
insensitive statements being made.

While debates are healthy in formulating any policy,
particularly one affecting our children, we must remind ourselves to be
cautious in expressing our views, particularly in a plural society.

Differences in opinion over any proposed policy,
especially among coalition partners, deserve serious attention. These component
parties, representing their communities, would best understand the sentiments
of their members.

Last week, Barisan chairman Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir
Mohamad and his deputy Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi demonstrated what
pragmatic politics is all about.

The two leaders showed Malaysians, especially the younger
ones, that compromise and tolerance is alive and being practised by the ruling
coalition.

Despite initial apprehension over how the Barisan elders
intend to resolve the issue, the coalition's concept of consensus has again
prevailed.

The leaders of the four Chinese-based parties, especially
MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Ling Liong Sik, have also correctly handled the
issue in a very moderate and low-key manner despite mounting pressure from some
quarters.

The decision has also met the sentiments of most parents
– preserving the mother tongue, as guaranteed under the Federal Constitution,
and striving to raise English proficiency in schools.

Parents with children in Chinese schools need not worry
about how these schools are going to maintain the high standard of Mathematics
and Science.

Although there are initial concerns that extra classes on
the use of English in the two subjects will burden pupils, I am sure most of
them will be able to cope.

What is more important here is that English will now be
given top priority in schools.

The teaching of English should not be left entirely to
schools. Many of us, especially parents from English-speaking homes, have heard
complaints from our children about their teachers' poor command of the
language.

Let's not have any delusions. As a result of our
education policy, which emphasised Bahasa Malaysia,
a generation of teachers and university lecturers with little grounding in
English are now in our schools and colleges.

Many are more comfortable in Bahasa, so we should not
expect our teachers to be proficient in English after a two-month crash course
in the language.

There is a need to create further awareness among
Malaysians on the push for English. Many Bahasa Malaysia
television programmes have started carrying subtitles in English. It is a good
move and should be made compulsory for all Malay programmes.

Political parties should be encouraged to set up classes
in English at their respective division headquarters and community halls,
especially in rural areas.

There are no losers in the bilingual formula, only
winners. Barisan leaders have woken up most Malaysians to the importance of
English; now it is for us to make the formula work.

Abubakar has been accused of being responsible for a
spate of church bombings in Jakarta
two years ago. He has denied involvement in the recent Bali
bombings.

We do not know how long Abubakar will remain in hospital
but last week, about 30 supporters in paramilitary uniform – many armed with
knives and some wearing masks – arrived at the hospital in Solo, Central
Java.

They were members of the extremist Laskar Mujahideen,
which has fought Christians in the Malukus, and were at the hospital supposedly
to protect Abubakar. Even his bodyguards, some wearing T-shirts that bear
Osama's picture, had free access to his room.

What is astonishing is that police guarding the hospital
did not prevent the militiamen from entering the hospital.

Fanatical JI supporters have openly declared that they
are ready to become suicide bombers if anyone dares lay a finger on their
leader.

While we must accept the principle that a person is
innocent until proven guilty, what is taking place in Indonesia
is deeply disturbing to many of us in the region.

There have been conflicting signals from Indonesian
leaders over security arrangements since the Bali
bombing on Oct 12 in which more than 190 people were killed.

The impasse between Abubakar and the authorities has left
many to question how Indonesia
intends to implement its tough anti-terror regulations if it is not firm in
dealing with Abubakar.

Legally, the fiery leader has remained a free man. The
police have not questioned him and neither has he signed and acknowledged a
detention order, a requirement under Indonesian law when an arrest is made.

One businessman was quoted by the Singapore Straits Times
as saying last week: "It is probably the only country where a sick excuse can
hold off arrest, and where police have to beg people to allow themselves to be
arrested. If that doesn't explain why this place is not secure, then nothing
will."

Regarded as the weakest link in the region's security
arrangements against terrorism, whatever action Indonesia
takes has serious implications on Malaysia.

Malaysia
has found itself being placed by Germany
on "highest caution" alert in its latest advisory to its citizens travelling in
the region.

The advisory said there was an increased terrorist threat
in Malaysia and
urged travellers to increase caution and exercise restraint when going to large
public gatherings. However, it noted that the Malaysian Government "continued
to intensify safety precautions and recently arrested several militant
Islamists."

Canada
also issued a similar advice on Oct 18 for its citizens in Malaysia
"to maintain a high level of personal security awareness at all times."

Thailand
has suffered the same negative perception with a warning by Denmark
that it was a potential target of terror attacks, as it had received
information on possible attacks in Phuket.

It is clear that Asean must act as one in fighting
terrorism and draw up a concerted effort to promote the region as a safe place
for tourists.

With winter approaching, holidaymakers in Europe
and United States
would look for tourist destinations to escape the cold – and Asean cannot
afford to lose out on these tourist dollars.

Although Asean has put on a brave face, saying the Bali
bombing will not affect tourism, we know the incident will have a bearing on us
because there are plenty of choices for tourists.

Asean must apply pressure on Indonesia
to take stronger action against radical groups because its inaction is causing
serious economic damage to the region.

It is a mockery that while the JI has been designated a
"foreign terrorist organisation," its leader is embraced by selfish Indonesian
politicians.

Indonesians are still in a state of denial. They accuse
the US of
having an agenda but forget that JI leaders are being sought by Malaysian and
Singaporean authorities.

Malaysia,
on its part, must seriously consider revoking the permanent resident status of
these suspected terrorists. It is unfortunate when foreign news agencies assume
that these wanted men are wrongly regarded as Malaysians when they are arrested
or are being sought.

When these wanted men are granted PR status, it would
only imply that insufficient security checks have been done. There should be no
delay for Malaysia
to take necessary action, even if legislation needs to be amended quickly, to
avoid such embarrassment.