Author Archives: wcw

Forces face farce


Under construction: One of the controversial littoral combat ships at the Boustead Naval Shipyard in Lumut.

THE current controversy surrounding the purchase of six littoral combat ships (LCS), which is burning RM11bil of taxpayers’ hard-earned money, isn’t the first discrepancy and alleged corruption, incompetence and mismanagement involving the Defence Ministry (Mindef).

In the name of national interest, details relating to procurement are often shrouded in secrecy, with information branded classified.

Last week, the government announced that it plans to set up a Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate the LCS issue, which has now been presented to the Cabinet.

It’s certainly a good follow-up to the detailed findings by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and the de-classification of a report which highlighted the poor financial management and cash flow issues ailing Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS), the company embroiled in the LCS fiasco.

Hopefully, the setting up of the RCI will expose Mindef’s shortcomings and reveal it to the public while establishing a proper procurement process.

The RCI shouldn’t be another panel with a glorified name which delays its deliberation and has its report collecting dust at the end of it.

The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has already stepped in, and Malaysians want to see the case expedited with the Attorney General hauling up the culprits responsible for the inflated costs.

This could include powerful political personalities who directed those implicated in the PAC report.

The sad reality is that the LCS issue is yet another shameful blot on Mindef’s long and never-ending series of scandals over the last 40 years.

Before we pore over its “chequered” history of the past decades, fresh in my mind is the 2019 news reports of the non-delivery of six helicopters worth RM300mil that were ordered in 2015.

Bernama had reported that a Mindef representative filed a complaint at MACC, saying the McDonnell Douglas MD530G lightweight combat helicopters were to be handed to Malaysia in 2017 and 2018.

It reported, quoting sources, that approval for the November 2015 purchase of the helicopters was not done according to procedures, with the government’s interests not properly protected.

The source told Bernama that the Malaysian government had paid up RM112.65mil for the acquisition, or 35% of the total cost.

We haven’t heard from MACC since 2019, when it said it was investigating 14 controversial land swap deals involving Mindef.

The list of dodgy procurement deals is long. It includes the 1981 purchase of 26 units of the British Alvis Scorpion tanks.

According to Consumer Association of Penang president, Mohideen Abdul Kader, the tank’s recommended Rolls-Royce gasoline engines were replaced with slower diesel ones, and the guns with heavier ones.

He said the modifications made the tanks heavier and slower, a sitting duck in any military encounter, and eventually in 2018, they were scrapped.

“The 186 SIBMAS armoured personnel carriers purchased by Malaysia in 1983 were found to lack combat effectiveness.

“Malaysia bought 18 Russian Sukhoi Su-30MKM Air Superiority Fighters, taking delivery of three in 2007 and the rest in 2009.

He said the deal, worth RM3.2bil, was made through a Russian state company whose local agent was paid 12% of the purchase price, amounting to RM380mil.

Mohideen said by 2018, most of them had become unserviceable, with only four of the 18 fighter jets still able to fly. The rest were under repair and the ministry eventually fired the contractor, apparently for failing to maintain the jets in airworthy condition.

“In 2002, the ministry negotiated through a Kuala Lumpur-based local company Perimekar Sdn Bhd to buy two Scorpene submarines and a used Agosta submarine produced by the French government at the price of RM4.5bil.”

Mohideen said a whopping commission of RM510mil was paid, 11% of the purchase price of the submarines.

He also claimed that in 2004, the PSC-Naval Dockyard was contracted to deliver six patrol boats to the Malaysian Navy, but only two were delivered in 2006, neither of which were fully operational.

He said by 2007, the original cost of RM5.35bil ballooned to RM6.7bil, a 26% increase.

Mohideen said the auditor general reported that the ministry had paid RM4.26bil, although only RM2.87bil worth of work had been completed, implying an overpayment of 48%. He said the Cabinet also waived late penalties of RM214mil.

A comprehensive list can’t be contained within this space because, sadly, it’s never-ending.

To take consolation, similar malpractices are reported all over the world.

Dr Zia Ul Haque Shamsi’s report on July 19, 2021, described India as having the most corruption scandals when it comes to buying arms and equipment.

He said India was plagued with scandals of military transactions despite stringent and painstaking bureaucratic processes for the approvals of defence procurements.

It will only be a matter of time before similar specialist writers on defence use Malaysia as a case study, especially when our approval process can hardly be described as rigorous.

As lawyer Mohideen rightly said, “the incestuous relationship between politically connected local agents of foreign arms manufacturers and the ministry must be ended.”

Enough is enough. It’s time we clean up our act and stop the country being looted through Mindef.

Deals signed without board meetings

PETALING JAYA: The managing director of the company undertaking the RM9bil littoral combat ships (LCS) project had so much power that he could sign all agreements, including letters of award (LOAs) to the main contractors involved in building the six ships.

In fact, 12 LOAs were given by former Boustead Heavy Industries Bhd (BHIB) managing director Tan Sri Ahmad Ramli Nor to two main contractors – Contraves Advanced Devices Sdn Bhd (CAD) and Contraves Electrodyamics Sdn Bhd (CED) totalling RM3.3bil – without the need to call for full board meetings.

The involvement of the two contractors inflated the cost to RM9bil.

“Tan Sri was given sweeping authority to execute and sign all agreements, LOAs with CAD. He was extremely confident that ‘whatever I’m going to do, it is ultimately going to be condoned by my boss’,” said forensic auditor Alliance IFA Sdn Bhd’s Prabhat Kumar.

He revealed that the appointment of CAD as lead contractor to procure components for the LCS was made through a directors’ circular resolution (DCR).

A DCR is normally issued as approval for routine matters and where the board feels that calling all the members is a waste of time. The directors merely need to sign the document.

Prabhat expressed his surprise at how such a major decision was made through a DCR as it was more appropriate to have a full board of directors meeting.

“The reason is that when the board meeting is being conducted, (at) that time every board member has the opportunity to raise a number of questions to clarify doubts and issues,” he added.

He told the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) that in his investigations of over 60 companies that “whenever DCRs, in a very critical situation, are used, it is always used to avoid discussions”. CAD and CED are two companies which are jointly owned by BHIB and German firm Rheinmetall Group.

Ahmad Ramli, an ex-navy chief, was managing director of BHIB and former chairman of Boustead Naval Shipyard Sdn Bhd (BNS), a unit of Boustead Heavy Industries Corporation (BHIC).

His name has been repeatedly mentioned in the 247-page PAC report on the RM9bil scandal.

The LCS was supposed to have been delivered in stages with the last one scheduled for 2023 but until today, not a single ship is ready although RM6bil has been paid to BNS.

“Primary evidence suggested that CAD was used as a vehicle – this is very important – to minimise transparency and to avoid the scrutiny and detection by the procurement team, the steering committee, and the internal audit of BHIC.

“The scrutiny by the three was avoided because BHIC is a public-listed company,” said Prabhat.

He said: “CAD will be the vehicle… (that) by entering into such a contract, that does not allow them to enter and to look into the details and the nitty-gritty of the business, which has been taken by them.”

The involvement of CAD in the LCS project, said Prabhat, had “resulted in a much higher cost than expected and provided an umbrella to hide the actual cost, which was paid to secure various components for this programme”.

Double claims, marked-up prices and no supporting documents

PETALING JAYA: Overlapping letters of award (LOAs), double claims for the same services, marked-up prices and the absence of supporting documents involving the two contractors in the setting up of a Built-in Test (BIT) centre for the littoral combat ships have cost taxpayers over RM898mil.

In its report, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) named the two contractors as Contraves Advanced Devices Sdn Bhd (CAD) and Contraves Electrodynamics Sdn Bhd (CED).

The two companies belong to Boustead Heavy Industries Corporation (BHIC), which has a 51% stake, while German-owned Rheinmetall Group has the other 49%. CAD and CED are the contractors of the uncompleted six littoral combat ships (LCS) project.

Forensic auditor Alliance IFA Sdn Bhd’s Prabhat Kumar said the involvement of the two contractors had resulted in possible damages, such as overlapping LOAs for the BIT centre and double claims for the same services in the LOAs over the combat management system (CMS) amounting to RM898mil.

The BIT centre is set up to conduct trials and test the functionality of all equipment, supposedly for the six LCS, before these are accepted for installation on the ships.

Prabhat told the PAC of discrepancies, such as payments made without supporting documents.

“Payment milestones without deliverables and necessary documents. We did not see any supporting documents.

“Exceptional mark-up, except for the signature of the person. You know, approve, approve, approve.

“Exceptional mark-up as a middleman resulted in the loss of cash. That is why there was a person who was caught,” he was quoted as saying on page 139 of the 247-page report.

He did not name the person caught.

Prabhat also pointed out irregularities relating to the LOAs for the CMS, which were issued to CAD and CED.

The LOA for the CMS, equipment, and engineering and integration was awarded to CED at RM1.185bil on the basis of a quotation from DCNS, a French company.

DCNS is the former name of France’s Naval Group, which had also built the Scorpene submarines for Malaysia.

Prabhat said the quotation from DCNS was dated Dec 23, 2010, but this was issued even before the signing of the LOA with the government.

“This reflects the intent of those involved in this project. They had no intention to deliver the LCS project.

“They only want – intent to maximise their gain which was issued even before the signing of the LOA with the government,” he said, adding the LOA was issued, “sidelining the evaluation process by restricting the involvement of the technical and commercial team.”

He said within six months, a supplemental LOA was issued in favour of CED by former Boustead Heavy Industries Bhd managing director Tan Sri Ahmad Ramli Mohd Nor and ex-navy captain Anuar Murad, the head of the LCS programme at the Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS), for the development of the BIT Centre at RM305mil.

“The scope of this LOA appeared to overlap with the original LOA. No specific approval was obtained from the board for the issuance of the LOA. The cost of investment was not budgeted in the LCS programme.

“The most important thing, payment was being made by them. Ownership lies with CAD and not BHIC,” he added.

The bills kept flowing in


Controversial project: One of the littoral combat ships under construction at the Boustead Naval Shipyard in Lumut.

PETALING JAYA: A huge amount of money meant for the uncompleted RM9bil six littoral combat ships (LCS) project was used to buy spare parts, including even TV sets, a special panel headed by former auditor-general Tan Sri Amrin Buang has revealed.

Fellow panel member Datuk Dr Mohd Tap Salleh also pointed out that the contract was drawn up in such a way that any activity or movement was considered progress and the government just had to pay.

“I think the point to note is that a lot of money was spent on buying spare parts when the ships were not ready,” said Ambrin.

“I think they are in the position to know exactly what they should be paying? When exactly should they make the purchase?

“So, if ada elemen-elemen yang tidak sihat, beli dulu you know, dalam keadaan apa sekali pun dan dapatkan duit itu cepat-cepat. (So, if there are unhealthy elements, buy first, you know, in whatever situation and get the money quickly).

“That is a different story-lah,’’ Ambrin said in his testimony to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC).

Ambrin had headed the Special Committee on Governance Investigation, Government Procurement and Finance’s report on the LCS project.

Dr Mohd Tap said the committee wanted to show to the PAC “that money was simply spent”.“Just to show you or to demonstrate to you, how crazy it was. They just buy because the money is there or the contract was there. So, we must pay. Activity means you buy anything or you move something, you have to pay,” he said.

Dr Mohd Tap described the LCS project as contractor-driven in the sense that the views of the end user – the Navy – was not taken seriously in terms of its needs.

“That is why the change from Sigma (class) to Gowind (class) was done within a few days and the negotiation of the pricing was also done within a few days, which is not possible.

“Unless there are hidden hands involved in this, I think the biggest issue that JKS (the committee) has faced all this while the end user – the military – was never very high on the agenda,” he said.

The Navy had wanted the Sigma design of the LCS by a Dutch firm and the combat management system (CMS) from France but following intense lobbying, Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS), a unit of Boustead Heavy Industries Corporation (BHIC), opted for the Gowind design and SETIS-CMS from France.

Former Royal Malaysian Navy chief admiral Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Jaafar had told PAC that Gowind was not a proven design while Sigma was already operational in Indonesia, Morocco and in a few other countries.

(Dr Mohd Tap, who was the Malaysia Integrity Institute president, died on Nov 30, 2021, at the age of 72. According to PAC members, he was very vocal in the meetings to investigate the LCS issue.)

Hope in our Rulers


Leading the way: Their Majesties the King and Queen have openly wished Christians Merry Christmas annually when the greeting has been questioned by some who claim it should be prohibited. – Istana Negara Facebook page

IT may seem odd that the institution of the Malay Rulers, whose origins can be traced back to the early 15th century, is today the most progressive voice. At the other end of the spectrum are our politicians, who often fumble and stumble, or worse, stay silent when their opinions are most needed.

The senior Sultans have instead, always spoken up and on many occasions, even reminded religious figures that Malaysia is a multi-ethnic country, and that diversity must not just be respected but embraced.

The powerful underlying message is – the Rulers are the heads of Islam in their respective states, which is clearly defined in the Federal Constitution.

The Religious Minister, federal religious agencies, local government and politicians, who also double up as theologians, are not the leaders of the religious order.

As the country ushers in its national day on Aug 31, it can’t be denied that many Malaysians are concerned, if not disturbed, by the direction our beloved country is taking.

The bickering politicians in the divided coalition have not imbued confidence with a leadership that is seemingly uninspiring and incapable of providing hope.

Leading up to the 65th National Day, the current political mood has dampened spirits in this country.

Race, religion and corruption have continued to dog and drag this country down, even though our founding fathers, Tunku Abdul Rahman, in particular, built it on a foundation of unity and hope.

He led a delegation of leaders reflecting Malaya’s multi-ethnicity to London for talks, and his first Cabinet was also clearly diverse.

Tunku incessantly said it, including in his popular column, “As I See It,” in The Star in the 1980s, that Malaysia is a secular country.

But fast forward to 2022, when certain religious groups and individuals have continued to push their hard-line religious agenda, yet nearly no political figures, be it in government or opposition, have voiced their positions or concerns.

Many Malay politicians, in fact, choose to compete among themselves by showing off their religious credentials or looking the other way and remaining silent in the face of far-reaching religious assertiveness. They even cast a blind eye when secular structures – which are part of a pillar of the 1957 Federal Constitution – are challenged.

After all, there’s an impending general election, so why risk incurring the wrath of the biggest bank of the electorate, the predominantly Malay-Muslims.

The Group of 25, comprising prominent moderate Malays, seems to be the only entity prepared to voice its stand on the changing religious climate and the need to uphold the Federal Constitution and Rukunegara.

To put it bluntly, a system that seems feudal and dating back to the Melaka Sultanate has proven to be reliable, adaptive, and engaging, even in modern day Malaysia.

Leading the way have been Their Majesties the King and Queen, who have openly wished Christians Merry Christmas annually when the greeting has been questioned by some who claim it’s an expression with Christian connotations and should be prohibited.

As for the individual states, three Sultans in particular, the Sultans of Selangor, Johor and Perak – have consistently voiced their sense of moderation by reassuring Malaysians, especially non-Muslims, that their interests are protected. While they are Malay Rulers, they are also the Rulers for all Malaysians.

The Sultan of Perak, Sultan Nazrin Muizzuddin Shah, is surely the champion of diversity with a strong commitment to differing views and opinions. His Royal Highness has also shared his concerns many times on the ills of corruption. His speeches are well-researched, and his articulate delivery is top notch.

Meanwhile, Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah, has taken to task politicians who use Islam to stop cultural events like Bon Odori, and he has also banned politicians from preaching in mosques in Selangor.

His logical decree, which became effective Jan 1, was aimed at preventing Islam from being politicised and misused by politicians in mosques and suraus, potentially leading to slander, friction, and division among Muslims.

In the case of the Sultan of Johor, His Majesty is someone who doesn’t mince his words.

In 2017, he condemned a launderette in Johor for adopting a Muslim-only policy, saying Johor “is not a Taliban state” and that the state “belongs to all races and faiths.”

Sultan Ibrahim Ibni Sultan Iskandar, in statements in 2015 and 2017, even went further by saying the state had cut off ties with the powerful federal government’s Jakim (Department of Islamic Development Malaysia) and questioned why it needed RM1bil for its annual budget.

His Majesty has also made his clarion Bangsa Johor call a popular one, which has resonated well with Johoreans.

Certainly, the rationality of these Rulers has provided a ray of hope to Malaysians who believe that moderation is still possible, and that none of us should cede territory to extremists from any religion or race.

Politicians come and go. Their interests are short-term, which is usually to win in an election, but our Rulers are here to stay, regardless of which political party or coalition is in charge.

It’s incredulous that Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is still talking about a so-called “new concept,” and a “new movement” called Gerakan Tanah Air, which is based on Malay and Islamic agendas.

When one hears of such a political narrative, it clearly indicates there has been no flourishment of new political ideas.

At least our founding fathers were far-sighted. Interestingly, when one reads the Federal Constitution, it consistently uses the term “The Rulers” and never “the Malay Rulers.”

Happy National Day and Daulat Tuanku.

Cigs, Vape & Weed with Syed Saddiq

 

Review the quit rent of some convent schools


The Klang Convent school is also a historical institution which is not utilised commercially.

THE Infant Jesus Sisters (IJS), who are the owners of the country’s convent schools, have appealed for a review of the need for quit rent on some of their school buildings as they are not utilised commercially.

Sister Theresa Chua, who heads IJS Malaysia, says the quit rent for some of the school buildings are exorbitant.

“There are no commercial gains whatsoever, but we have to send appeal after appeal for the rate to be reduced.

“Why can’t this be a standard policy with the Education Ministry (MOE) sending a directive to the Land Office to get this done,’’ she asks.

Sister Theresa says many people assume that the Sisters own many properties in prime areas with high commercial value if sold.

“All the existing convent schools are used by the government. Selling may not even be an option as requesting the return of convent schools from the government takes at least five years or more of negotiations, besides justifying the reason for the school to be returned although the property belongs to the Sisters,’’ she says.

There are currently 56 convent schools comprising 34 primary and 22 secondary schools. In 2016, the IJS had already requested the return of its 170-year-old Convent Light Street (CLS) from the MOE with the intention for the school building to continue as an educational institution for all children of Malaysia.

The new school would be coed and placed under a private operator. The IJS made the decision to ask for CLS to be returned following declining enrolment in the past decade and escalating upkeep costs of the heritage building.

Sister Theresa says the Sisters have no properties to sell, except for one in Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, which is home to elderly Sisters.

“They will have no place to live if they sell their home in Cheras to pay for repairs to the schools. The Sisters have no income and we need to cope with ageing and retired Sisters,’’ she adds.

Sister Theresa appeals to the MOE to hear their concerns and to appoint special officers who understand the issues of convent schools, similar to those appointed to deal with Chinese and Tamil vernacular schools.

A long and distinguished history


Convent Bukit Nanas is one of the oldest schools in Malaysia and has an illustrious list of alumni. — Filepic/The Star

CONVENT schools in Malaysia have a distinguished history dating back to the 19th century. They have iconic heritage buildings and have produced many prominent personalities over the decades.

The 170-year-old Convent Light Street (CLS) in Penang is the oldest girls’ school in South-East Asia and is located in a heritage zone.

Founded by French Catholic nuns in 1852, it is one of the most highly regarded missionary schools in the state. However, in the past decade, CLS has been hit by declining enrolment thanks to competition from international and Chinese schools.

Convent schools were once premier schools that used the English language as the medium of education, and were known for producing well-rounded students who excelled academically as well as in sports and music.

The three founding nuns were part of a group of five who managed to make it to Penang alive after the arduous journey from France via Singapore.

The sprawling CLS grounds were also home to the administrative offices of Captain Francis Light after he founded George Town in 1786. Stamford Raffles, the founder of Singapore, also worked at Govern-ment House in the CLS grounds. Penang, then known as the Prince of Wales Island, was his first overseas posting.

Convent Bukit Nanas (CBN) in Kuala Lumpur is also one of the oldest schools in Malaysia – established in 1899 – and is one of the first schools to be distinguished as a Cluster School of Excellence by the Education Ministry

Its alumni includes former minister Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz, Tengku Permaisuri Norashikin Abdul Rahman of Selangor, Bank Negara governor Tan Sri Nor Shamsiah Mohd Yunus, prominent lawyers Raja Eleena Almarhum Sultan Azlan Muhibbuddin Shah Al-Maghfur-lah and Ambiga Sreenevenan and the late singer Adibah Noor.

CLS has its list of famous alumni too, such as Datuk Ooi Chean See, Malaysia’s first woman orchestra conductor; Datuk Ng Poh Tip,The Star’s first woman group chief editor; and Datin Paduka Tunku Khadijah Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra, our first prime minister’s daughter, who studied as a full-time boarder in CLS.

A desperate Mission


Storied school: Convent Light Street was set up in 1852, the first IJS convent school in the country. Many of these highly regarded mission schools were built over 100 years ago. — LIM BENG TATT/The Star

THE 56 convent schools nationwide, which are run by the Infant Jesus Sisters (IJS), are in desperate need of financial support with at least 90% of the school buildings in dilapidated conditions in the absence of sufficient maintenance funds.

Many of these highly regarded convent schools were built over 100 years ago, with the first IJS school as well as orphanage set up in Light Street, George Town, in 1852.

At least two schools caught fire recently as they had to cope with roof leaks, wiring and plumbing issues, and even floods.

In a rare interview, Sister Mary Theresa Chua, the Provincial of the IJS – which is legally known as the Lady Superior of the Society of Saint Maur – says the estimated RM3mil annual grants from the Education Ministry (MOE) for all 56 schools would only be enough for basic maintenance, working out to around “RM50,000 to RM70,000 for each school’’.

“The buildings are very old and daily use, with minimal repairs, has taken a toll. In short, the yearly government allocation is barely enough to cover repairs and maintenance costs as we always must rely on donors and carry out fund-raising initiatives,’’ she says.


Sister Theresa: ‘The yearly government allocation is barely enough to cover repairs and maintenance costs and the schools have to rely on donors and raise funds themselves.’

For example, she points out how the authorities have yet to carry out repair work on the slope bordering the 123-year-old Convent Bukit Nanas after a landslip in February this year. The site borders the Kuala Lumpur Forest Eco Park, and Sister Theresa fears that the ongoing wet spell and the year-end rainy season would be a problem.

In 2020, a landslip also hit the school, which was established in 1899, after heavy rain caused a near collapse of a retaining wall.

Sister Theresa describes the plight of convent schools in Malaysia, which have produced hundreds of thousands of students including prominent figures, as desperate.

“We are in dire straits. We have no one to turn to and we pray that our problems, especially involving the safety of our students and teachers, will be heard,’’ she says.

Sister Theresa explains insurance premiums are not covered by the government and “when any unfortunate incident happens, the Sisters are left to handle and manage them”.

“Often, the Sisters have no means to make proper major repairs as evidenced in the latest Convent Bukit Nanas landslip.

“What makes no sense is that the landslip was due to the Forestry Department felling trees and cutting through the hillslope, thus loosening the soil and affecting water flow resulting in the clogging and retention of mud, which in turn blocks drains so that water is not able to flow,’’ she adds.

Sister Theresa says there is an urgent need for the MOE to meet Mission school authorities to talk about critical building issues, such as, for example, electrical appliances like airconditioners, computers and projectors that have led to capacity overload.

“We are in a dilemma. Most of these schools are over 100 years old and cannot cater for high voltage use.

“However, digital equipment is necessary in the current era and environment for teaching purposes,” she notes.

To support the Convent schools -– OCBC Bank Bhd, Account No : 701-157675-5

For more information, also call Sr Theresa Chua, Tel- 03-20318243 or 03-20780615

Race-y reflections


Dr Mahathir announcing the formation of a new coalition comprising Malay-based parties, non-governmental organisations, academics and professionals, recently. – AZLINA ABDULLAH/The Star

THE last thing the country needs is another political entity that champions race and religion exclusively. Who cares if it’s called a coalition, movement, or political party?

Malaysia has allowed race and religion, as well as rampant corruption, to become the bane of its existence. This makes for such a toxic combination.

There’s nothing worse than taking a position or stand in the name of God and race, especially if it’s purportedly done for political reasons.

On the cusp of Malaysia’s 65th National Day, it’s soul-sapping to read about Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad announcing the formation of a new coalition comprising Malay-based parties, non-governmental organisations, academics and professionals, too.

The Gerakan Tanah Air coalition includes his party, Pejuang, the National Indian Muslim Alliance (Iman), Parti Bumiputera Perkasa Malaysia (Putra) and Parti Barisan Jemaah Islamiah Se-Malaysia (Berjasa).

Dr Mahathir says the movement was formed to change the government and challenge Umno in the next general election, “and to fight for the interest of the Malays.”

Despite losing all the 42 seats Pejuang contested in the Johor state elections, Dr Mahathir is still determined to contest in 120 constituencies from the 222-seat Dewan Rakyat.In the Johor state polls, the fledgling party was humiliated when all the Pejuang candidates lost their deposits.

Although Dr Mahathir blamed “money politics” for their defeat, the results were hardly surprising since not many voters found the party appealing.

It seems that Dr Mahathir has opted to use race as a selling point in the elections.

It has worked effectively in many predominantly Malay constituencies, especially for Umno, PAS and even Bersatu, whose membership is only open to bumiputras or Muslims.

In the case of Barisan Nasional, it has component parties representing different ethnic groups, where the politics of consensus can be practised. Likewise, the Perikatan Nasional is a coalition with some semblance of diversity.

But the same cannot be said of Gerakan Tanah Air, with the party deciding that it has no intention – or would even try tokenism – to work with other Malaysian groups.

The formation of Gerakan Tanah Air is a retrogressive move. It is a devastating setback to politics in Malaysia, where there are still many politicians who prefer to be champions of their narrow communal interests.

Despite claiming to uphold the racial and religious interests of their communities, corruption has eaten into institutions which they are supposed to protect.

There are also religious figures, especially from PAS, who have even become apologists for corruption and worse, have proclaimed that a corrupt Muslim leader is more acceptable than a non-Muslim leader.

We don’t need to go into details but there have been enough court cases where politicians, using the mantra of race and religion, have enriched themselves at inconceivable scales.

They have plundered the nation’s wealth and stolen from their communities with nary a second thought.

How these politicians get away with such warped thinking in this day and age is simply mind-boggling.

The fact that PAS keeps getting re-elected in some states probably reinforces their belief that they can get away with anything, so long as race and religion are utilised.

Malaysia desperately needs personalities, not just politicians, who are prepared to speak up for good governance by using a Malaysian approach, because the future of Malaysia is dependent on every citizen.

No political party is going to form the next federal government without the participation of all races.

Ironically, while Dr Mahathir talks of Malay-Muslim unity, his opponents are, in fact, the pre-existing Malay-based parties.