Monthly Archives: June 2011

Big test for Chinese voters

The country’s demographic change has many political, economic and social implications and the big boss of the Lion Group conglomerate certainly knows how the trend will affect the community.

Being a businessman, Cheng chose to dwell on the economic aspect. The owner of the Parkson department store chain said the Chinese community would have a chance to play a leading role in the country’s economy even though the population was low.

Speaking at the ACCIM Youth conference, Cheng did not want to ruin the upbeat mood, telling his listeners not to be pessimistic. Being the shrewd businessman that he is, he cleverly stayed away from talking about the political effects.

But he can certainly calculate what is ahead. The continuing drop in the Chinese population would correspond with a drop in political clout.

In a plural society, racial numbers do matter. It is the same in the United States where election candidates play along racial voter numbers to win their votes.

In 2009, journalist researcher Helen Ang highlighted in her report that the country’s Chinese population will decline to a mere 18.6% of the population in 25 years. While the bumiputra population for this decade (2011-2021) will see at least 1.98% annual growth, the Chinese population growth over this period will only be 0.73% annually.

Citing a study by researcher Saw Swee Hock, Ang wrote that by 2035, Malaysia will have 41 million people, with bumiputras making up 72.1% of the population.

Even Penang is now officially a Malay majority state. The latest statistics from the Department of Statistics indicate that Malays are increasing and have now outnumbered the Chinese by 0.7% in the once Chinese dominant state.

In 2009, the Penang Malay population stood at 654,300, just ahead of 651,600 Chinese by 0.1%. Last year, it widened to 0.7%. Of the estimated 1.6 million population in Penang, 670,100 were Malays (41.6%) while 658,700 were Chinese (40.9%). There were 9.7% In­dians (155,600), 7% non-Ma­laysians (112,200), 0.8% others and other bumiputras (13,300).

In Selangor, another state with a big Chinese population, they now make up 29% of the state’s population of over five million.

We all know the reasons for the drop in Chinese population, which range from late marriages, preference for small families to migration. But there is less talk about the political effects, particularly the community’s diminishing political importance.

Chinese voters generally get angry and offended if they hear, even in the most subtle way, that their votes could be foregone. After all, in any election, every vote is crucial.

In a close fight between two Malay candidates, for instance, the minority Chinese voters can be the deciding factor. In fact, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has always reminded his listeners that it was the Chinese voters who saved many Umno candidates in the 1999 general election following the sacking of his deputy Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Indeed, the Chinese can be kingmaker by voting strategically. Or they can vote to vent their frustrations and end up outside the government.

The big test will come in the next general election. Of the 222 parliamentary seats, only 40-odd seats are in Chinese majority areas. The others are Malay majority or racially mixed seats. There is no Indian majority parliamentary seat.

It is obvious at this point there is still much resentment in urban Chinese areas, with the voting pattern aligning towards the opposition. There is even a misconception that the Chinese, if they voted for the opposition entirely, would see their position strengthened based on the belief that PKR-PAS can deliver the Malay seats.

But it is a big gamble as the Chinese voters may just find themselves the only one outside the government, as in the case of Sarawak where the community was led by PKR-PAS to believe that the other races would join in to topple Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud.

In the end, the DAP ended up with 12 state seats while the SUPP was almost wiped out. The urban Malays-Dayaks, it turned out, voted solidly for Barisan Nasional, with PBB winning all 35 seats it contested. The SUPP lost its deputy chief ministership and is left with only two state assemblymen.

The question now is whether the Chinese voters would be happy with the 40-odd parliamentary seats for the DAP come the next election and see the community representation completely out of the government as they increase the number of PAS Members of Parliament.

The Chinese are the ones who will chart their future since Malay and Indian votes have shifted back to Barisan. It is now a choice of whether they want to follow their heart or rule with their head.

The numbers just don’t add up

We are told that there are only 60 licensed massage centres in the whole of Selangor, which means the thousands of such centres that we see are illegal.

That comes to one point – why are they able to operate openly in so many residential areas without the local councils cracking down on them?

Can the people be blamed for thinking there are elements of corruption involved, and strong suspicions of protection with powerful backing?

Or is it simply that enforcement is so pathetic the officers are fighting a losing battle against the massage parlour operators?

State executive councillor Ronnie Liu can be sure that no one in the state believes his claim that there are only 60 licensed premises and that the licences were issued before 2006.

After Pakatan Rakyat came to power, no new permits were issued, according to him.

One has to be a fanatical loyalist of Liu to believe this. Or, if we accept his claim, it simply means the state has been unable to stop the sprouting of these massage centres.

There’s another factor that makes the situation different from the other states – the political dimension of this multi-million ringgit service industry.

Liu himself has been the target of many allegations, including finger pointing by his own comrades, until DAP chairman Karpal Singh had to issue a directive ordering a halt to more discussions on the issue of support letters and allegations of cronyism.

Liu also got himself some unnecessary publicity in 2008 when he was arrested by the police for allegedly obstructing the Subang Jaya Municipal Council enforcement workers and police personnel who were raiding a suspected vice den in Puchong.

He was accused by the police of allegedly trying to stop the police and council workers who were trying to seal a shop lot which was used as an illegal massage centre.

The Pandamaran state assemblyman was arrested on the spot but released on bail. The next day, the police received an order from the Attorney-General’s Office to charge him. The court case is on-going at the PJ Magistrate’s court, with Liu being called to enter his defence already.

The Local Government, Study and Research Committee member has also sued former Selangor Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Muhammad Khir Toyo for allegedly accusing him of immoral activities and involvement in vice.

Liu denied that he had obstructed the authorities from carrying out their duties.

Last year, Karpal Singh rescued him after his party leaders accused him of abusing his official state letter heads. A gag order was issued and the matter hushed up. He was let off with a “severe reprimand” from the party.

Liu survived that political storm but his assistant Tee Boon Hock, a Klang municipal councillor, found himself sacked from the party for allegedly misusing the letter heads to secure contracts for his cronies.

But there are more questions than answers to the massage centre issue in Selangor. Klang Municipal Council president Muhd Ikhsan Mukri has said there are 45 licensed massage parlours in Klang.

If there are only 60 licensed massage centres in the whole of Selangor, and out of this Klang has 45, that would make Klang the town with the highest number of licensed massage centres.

How Klang has managed to get all the licences is another question.

Muhd Ikhsan said that since the beginning of this year, 16 operations have been conducted and 81 premises were checked. He did not explain how they checked on 81 premises if there were only 45 legal ones.

Tee, who is now a sworn political enemy of Liu, has claimed there are 60 massage centres in Klang. He did not say whether they are legal or illegal.

In all fairness, there are many legitimate massage centres in Selangor. In fact, the operators of clean ones have to struggle, often on unfair terms and turf, against the illegal ones that offer sex services.

Many decent ones in Selangor offer family packages and have clear signs put up to say they do not tolerate sex services.

Certainly, there is bigger demand for massage services in Selangor because of the stressful lifestyle here. Most Selangor residents work in Kuala Lumpur but reside in the suburbs of Petaling Jaya. And massages have been proven to be able to relax the muscles.

I do not wish to rub it in. There is nothing wrong in issuing more permits for massage centres but to claim that no new permits are being issued and then we see such premises mushrooming, even in residential neighbourhoods, only smacks of poor governance.

None of Yayasan Selangor’s business

Have we become so politically partisan that we have refused to ask how this foundation, which has a horrible reputation for mismanagement, could possibly be able to utilise the land properly and efficiently?

There are now suspicions, rightly or wrongly, that the land currently being used by nursery operators would be passed on to crony developers once it has been acquired by the state.

Yayasan Selangor is not in the business of developing land. It cannot even run itself properly. We are now suddenly being told that the land where the nurseries are located has underground water pipes and that, for security reasons, the nursery operators have to move out.

But Yayasan Selangor will get the land. We should then be demanding to know why Yayasan Selangor would want the land with all these “dangerous” water pipes.

The fact is that these 50 nursery operators are sitting on land that is next to the over 1,300ha of land belonging to the Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia which has been earmarked for redevelopment. The development in the area comes under the Greater Kuala Lumpur Strategic Development Project initiative which is under the 10th Malaysia Plan.

Of the present total land area, rubber plantations take up about 939ha (2,320 acres) while the remainder includes the nurseries and other buildings. So who can blame them if they are suspicious of the motives of the state government?

Even if we accept the argument that the state has the right to take over this land, we should be looking at the track record, or lack of it, of Yayasan Selangor.

Financial mismanagement has caused Yayasan Selangor to chalk up RM7.41mil in deficit from January till November last year.

In normal circumstances, the financial state of the foundation would have been called a scandal and there would have been a demand for a Royal Commission of Inquiry to be set up to investigate it.

But it looks like many of the Barisan Nasional state assemblymen are still not thinking, acting and functioning like aggressive opposition leaders.

Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim himself has revealed that “expenditure that is not transparent, prudent or reasonable had caused the cost of Yayasan Selangor’s 40th anniversary celebration to reach almost RM1mil”.

The audit on Yayasan Selangor was done from Nov 29 till Dec 1 last year after the Sultan of Selangor snubbed the foundation’s 40th anniversary luncheon, which was scheduled for Nov 15, over its exorbitant cost. The luncheon was subsequently called off.

First, the state government said the luncheon was billed at RM300,000 but Selangor Umno claimed that the event would have cost RM800,000. The audit report showed that the foundation actually spent RM996,472 on the overall celebration.

The luncheon may have been cancelled but Yayasan Selangor still had to pay RM387,232. The other costs included RM225,000 for copies of the Quran, RM206,040 on souvenirs and clothes, and RM178,200 on a fishing competition.

Can someone shed some light over this fishy event involving public funds?

The audit report also stated that Yayasan Selangor could recover an estimated RM148,500 from the company in charge of the luncheon, but it had yet to do so.

The fiasco, however, did not stop the Yayasan Selangor board of trustees from paying themselves bonuses of RM5,000 last year – a violation of the foundation’s memorandum.

Yayasan Selangor’s board of trustees includes Khalid, who is chairman, former state secretary Datuk Ramli Mahmud, Selangor executive councillor Dr Halimah Ali, Ilham Marzuki, Datuk Mohd Arif Ab Rahman, Sulaiman Wak and Haji Mohd Adenan Deraman.

The only saving grace is that the Mentri Besar has taken action and revealed the contents of the audit, and a former deputy general manager has been charged in court on three counts of graft involving RM45,000 in connection with the anniversary celebrations.

The nursery operators who have been toiling the land for over 22 years are now being shown a grand plan submitted by Yayasan Selangor. It supposedly involves converting the land into an expo area with plans for flower shows, 24-hour security and proper lighting.

Who are Yayasan Selangor to tell these operators how to run their nurseries when they have no experience whatsoever in this business?

And if they buy the Yayasan Selangor idea, what about the security of the water pipes claim that has been bandied about?

The story doesn’t seem to tally at all. Would the water pipes/security claims suddenly vanish?

It’s just like the pomelo farmers in Tambun, Perak, who have finally been given a 99-year land lease after having to fight their case for years.

Then there are the ornamental fish rearers in Gopeng who are still fighting for their land despite bringing in millions of ringgit for the country.

These people truly deserve our support. They have toiled on their land for decades while contributing to the nation’s economy and no one should grab the land from them.

Certainly, in Sungai Buloh, Yayasan Selangor should learn to run itself first before telling the flower growers how to run their business. It’s really none of Yayasan Selangor’s business.

On The Beat: A journo’s jottings

SINCE the first On The Beat was published on Feb 23, 1997, Datuk Seri Wong Chun Wai’s column has appeared religiously every Sunday, except when there was no Sunday Star due to press shutdowns. That means he produced pieces while managing breaking news about national and international crises, when he was on leave or on holiday, when he was ill.

It must be passion.

To Wong, Star Publications (M) Bhd executive director and group chief editor, his column is, “essentially, my life”.

“It’s my job, yes, but I also feel it’s something I need to do. And I always feel that if I do not write about an issue that week, news moves so fast that by the following week, the issue would have been overtaken by events or lost its relevance,” said Wong at a recent interview following the May 25 launch of a compilation of his columns in a book that shares the same name, On The Beat.

In the 14 years since that first column, Wong has produced over 600 articles covering everything from politics and Government policies to education, the media, unity and religion; 200 of those articles were put together for the book.

The articles were sorted into six categories for the book: politics, unity, corruption, education, media and “other things besides”. Each section also features a new article written especially for the publication.

Out of so many, can he pick one piece that he enjoyed writing very much, we wonder. Wong recalls a recent article about turning 50, which received a good response from readers of The Star (Confronting the 50s head-on, On The Beat, Focus, May 22).

“I talked about things that people could relate to, including ageing and relationships. I think people also enjoyed it because I took potshots at a few politicians,” laughs Wong.

He readily admits that humour is especially difficult to convey through the printed word.

“If there is one person in The Star who can do that, it’s (acting editor, iPad) Philip Golingai. It’s not easy to write humour. The most satisfactory part of writing the column is when I write a piece with a satirical touch,” he says.

His life: ‘It’s something I have to do’, says Datuk Seri Wong Chun Wai about writing his column every week without fail. — Raymond Ooi/The Star

Path of moderation

At times, Wong receives 10 to 20 responses to his column in a week. And sometimes, there is no feedback at all – “Then I wonder if the article is inconsequential, has no impact or people are just bored by it.”

He gets a fair share of both bouquets and brickbats, says Wong, adding that, “My wife constantly reminds me not to let (the bouquets) go to my head!”

He has a rather unique perspective on the negative feedback: “Politicians from both sides of the political divide will call to criticise my writing. I always say that if both sides are not satisfied, it means that you have taken the correct path, which is the middle path.

“Running a newspaper is never easy because politicians and supporters want you to write positive things about them. Even if something is just slightly not beneficial to them, they get very angry,” he says.

“With celebrities, they become who they are because of the publicity that the media give them. But when there is negative publicity about them, they get angry and suddenly start talking about privacy!”

The brickbats do get to Wong sometimes. “At times, I feel it’s unfair. I’ve been accused of being racist, a chauvinist, an Opposition sympathiser and a Government lackey.

“That bugs me because I see myself as a true Malaysian. I am proud to have relatives who are Malay, and my favourite aunt is a Muslim. I have friends from both sides of politics too. And I studied Malay literature in school and at UKM, where I also had to pass a compulsory Islamic Civilisation course,” says Wong, a political science and history graduate who joined The Star in 1984, a day after he finished his final university examination.

“I find (the accusations) disappointing because if you were to go through my 600 columns, you would notice that moderation and national unity have constantly been my theme,” he says emphatically.

“Consistently, it is about taking the middle road. Many people ask whether it is true that in Malaysia, there are certain things we cannot write about. In some ways, we do steer clear of sensitive issues like race and religion, but with most other issues, we can talk about them. (The problem) is that most writers do not have the skill to talk about such issues without offending people.

“Basically, I do not use the thunder-and-lightning approach, like a politician would, because I am not trying to score political points with anyone. Instead, I discuss and talk about an issue in a measured tone and a sober manner.

“I do not offend people nor try, or even want, to put people down, so even when people are criticised they can accept it. That has essentially been my style.”

Wong adds that too many issues in Malaysia are unrealistically treated as either black or white.

“You are either for the Opposition or for the Government, yet both sides have their strengths and weaknesses. Malaysians have become so emotional that they refuse to see the weakness in their favoured side or the strengths of the other.

“For example, if a politician is seen as their saviour or hero, even when there are blemishes or black marks on his record, people try to justify or deny them. People do not see politicians as human beings with weaknesses, they’re seen as either saints or devils.”

When Wong first began writing On The Beat, he was a news editor; now, he is the group chief editor – is it different writing the column now?

“When I look through my early columns now, I feel that some of them were not well-prepared, not well-researched or not analytical enough. In some mentions of people, I feel I may have been too kind, not critical enough,” says Wong.

“Now, I feel I am more analytical, more mature, more critical and courageous. I suppose this is confidence built up over the 14 years.”

Unity and change

Of all the topics he has explored over the years, closest to his heart is national unity, he says, recalling his school years when it seemed the norm rather than something that we are struggling to achieve now.

“For older Malaysians who had the benefit of studying in English medium schools, we made large numbers of friends outside our racial group in a very natural way.

“I studied in a Catholic school (St Xavier’s Institution, Penang), made many friends there who, until today, remain friends.

“English medium schools were considered neutral ground. I have relatives who are Muslims, and there are Christians and Buddhists in my family. I have very good Malay and Indian friends, and working in The Star has always been the best because it has people of all races, and we are able to discuss issues in a very open manner.

“I have always felt and maintained that we should bring back English medium schools, which are a good way to forge national unity.”

Wong usually starts writing on Friday nights to meet the Saturday night deadline; however, he has no qualms starting anew if something crops up that he feels he should address urgently.

And when the muse remains silent, what does he do?

“I surf the Internet to get a feel of what could be a current issue I may have missed or need to expand on. When all fails, there are always certain issues that never go out of date and that need to be addressed over and over again, but in different ways.

“One of them is, of course, the deteriorating standard of English and the need to promote the language here if we are to become global citizens. Corruption is also something newspapers need to write about over and over to drive home the message. The third issue is the need to push for better democratic space, more room for press freedom, and to do away with laws we do not need.

“I have always said that we need to repeal the OSA (Official Secrets Act) and the Printing Presses and Publications Act. It does not make sense that print newspapers have to apply for a licence every year when online media do not have to.”

Apart from gathering the columns together for posterity, the book will also give back to society: nett proceeds from sales of On The Beat will go to Kenosis Home, a Kuala Lumpur drug rehabilitation centre founded by Pastor Richard Lee, who was a drug addict for more than two decades before seeing the light.

Says Wong: “It’s easy to give sermons every Sunday but to go out into the streets to talk to drug addicts, prostitutes and the homeless is very difficult. Pastor Richard does that every day.”

After he heard about Lee’s work, Wong went to one of Lee’s street feeding exercises in Brickfields, KL, and was amazed that people from all races and faiths came to receive food and counselling from the group.

“He does not preach or try to convert them. I was really touched by what he does.

“He asks questions that take us out of our comfort zone. For example, he asks, ‘A lot of you go to church every Sunday in your very middle-class PJ. But how many of you will be comfortable if I bring my flock, who are drug addicts, prostitutes or HIV-positive, and seat them next to you in church?’

“For me he is a real do-er, not a talker. The Kenosis Home is also not very well known because Pastor Lee does not shout about it, so he deserves that support,” says Wong.

On The Beat is available at MPH, Borders and Popular Bookstores nationwide at RM38 a copy. Proceeds from its sale will be channelled to Kenosis Home in Jalan Kelang Lama, Kuala Lumpur. For corporate or bulk purchases of the books, contact The Star’s circulation department at             03-7967 1777      .

The book is also available as an e-book at The Star Online’s new e-book shop, ebooks.thestar.com.my. Customers must log in using their MyStar ID to purchase the book (registration for the ID is free).

Trim the excesses and wastage

In the United States and Europe, the price of fuel for cars changes almost every day as it is not subsidised. This is something most Malaysians are unfamiliar with as we are, and have been, living on subsidies for almost every essential item, even sugar which is unheard of elsewhere.

The government’s bill for subsidising petrol, diesel and gas has risen from RM8bil to RM18bil a year. Yes, it’s a staggering figure and certainly we can expect the numbers to keep increasing unless there is a drop in crude oil prices.

The government can take the easy way out by keeping the prices of petrol down to remain popular, especially with a general election looming. But that would be bad governance.

If Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim can reduce the price of petrol as he claims, I am sure Obama would be quite keen to hear from him. The Opposition Leader must have a magic wand. He may be able to do it but the long-term effects would be disastrous and could well bleed the nation. To put it bluntly, it could bankrupt Malaysia.

There is a cost to the subsidy – the govern­ment should be channelling the subsidy to the health, education and housing sectors. There are also many infrastructure projects that have already been announced and we wonder how many of these would be affected, even put on hold, if the subsidy bill continues to spiral upwards.

The government could save at least RM103bil over the next five years if it were to slash its subsidy bill now. This, however, can only be done gradually with enough notice served on Malaysians to explain that the govern­ment just cannot continue to bear this burden.

The government has little choice but to explain to the people the rationale behind the subsidy cuts. It’s not an easy task as ordinary Malaysians have bills to pay. And against the backdrop of increasing costs of production, most employers would be hard-pressed to increase the salaries of their workers.

At the same time, we can expect industries to pass their cost to consumers even though the increase in electricity rates is only an average of 7.12%.

The Opposition has been playing the populist card, blaming the government for every price hike and promising to reduce the price of oil, which any rational person would know is not achievable. Surely, every serving government would want to keep prices down to get itself re-elected.

Economists want the government to take a more daring approach to push ahead the subsidy rationalisation exercise. But they are obviously not counting the political costs if this is not done gradually.

Their fear is that if Malaysia continues to bear the high subsidy bill, it would impact on the country’s sovereign ratings as the budget deficit would stand to widen.

In simple language, the country’s debt cannot be allowed to increase if its credit status is to be respected. The bottom line is: provision of subsidies is not a sustainable practice. It has to be removed eventually but at the same time, the government is well aware that any decision should not affect the consumers’ standard of living. Even some government MPs have been cautious about any increase in petrol or food items.

But take the sugar subsidy as an example. When the prices of coarse and fine sugar increased by 20 sen to RM2.30 per kilo, it reduced government subsidy by RM116.6mil from RM400mil per year. The latest increase is the first this year, after last year’s hikes of 20 sen in January, 25 sen in July and 20 sen in December.

It is incredulous that we would fork out so much for sugar while we ask for less of it with our teh tarik. Yet some of us will get bitter when there is a cut in subsidy for sugar.

Look at the statistics: there are 1.4 million adults suffering from diabetes as at 2006, according to a national health and morbidity survey. We can assume that the number has gone up since then, at the rate we consume sugar-laden soft drinks.

Now, according to estimates by the Health Ministry’s disease control division, health promotion, management and treatment of diabetic patients take up about 15% to 17% of the ministry’s total budget of RM13.7bil in 2009. That can’t be sweet news to Malaysians, especially taxpayers. Moreover, that figure does not include diabetics who seek treatment in private hospitals.

But at the same time, we, too, want the government to cut down on excessiveness and wastage and review existing projects that are perceived to bring little economic returns.

We can save but the government must also play its part. It’s a shared responsibility.

Malaysians, like everyone else on this planet, cannot live like they used to.

The days of cheap food will be a thing of the past. We cannot depend on fossil fuel forever. We cannot leave the fan, air-conditioner, lights and television on for no reason and, certainly, our children will pay a heavy price if we waste water as we are doing now.

This seems to be the only immediate answer if we want to sustain the planet.