Author Archives: wcw

We mustn’t fiddle as the economy suffers


On point: Anwar and Zafrul after the special Dewan Rakyat meeting to address Trump’s tariffs. They have been working hard to communicate with the public on the issue. — Bernama

LET’S face it – the world economy will never be the same again – and that includes Malaysia as well – following the implementation of the reciprocal tariffs by the Trump administration even if they are reduced or eliminated.

Malaysia will face strong economic headwinds and while the ordinary Malaysian may still not feel it, they will eventually.

So it is better that our leaders prepare our citizens for the implications of the long-term shifts that are already challenging global trade dynamics and geopolitical trust.

Unfortunately, most of our Malaysian politicians are still engrossed in playing up inconsequential issues to win attention.

Some are still squabbling over whether they are more Malay or Malaysian while the world economy is crumbling.

The World Bank has projected our 2025 GDP growth rate to be reduced to 3.9%, lower than Bank Negara’s current projection of 4.5% to 5.5%.

Last week, Moody’s Investors Service said the tariff shocks posed a major threat to Malaysia’s sovereign credit ratings.

The ratings firm sees downside risks to its initial projection of 5% growth for Malaysia this year no thanks to global trade tensions.

There’s also a possibility that the government will increase spending to counter headwinds from US-imposed levies, Christian De Guzman, senior vice-president at Moody’s, said, according to Bloomberg.

“If the global economic outlook were to turn very significantly and the government would perhaps take measures to offset some of that weakening in the global economy, they could perhaps delay or postpone the petrol subsidy re-targeting,” he said.

He was referring to the government’s plans to end blanket subsidies for the country’s most popular gasoline by mid-year.

“The risks to fiscal consolidation are there,” he said in the interview on Monday.

Malaysia has since 2004 enjoyed an A3 rating at Moody’s – the highest among peers in developing South-East Asia.

The report said that while our credit score has withstood the fallout from the 2008 global financial crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic, the blow from US tariffs clouds the country’s prospects.

Moody, in fact, changed its outlook for Thailand to negative just last week, citing potential impact from higher levies.

Singapore Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, meanwhile, mastered the geopolitical narrative effectively to win handsomely in the 2025 elections.

I am not sure if our voters would want to hear the implications of tariffs for Malaysia as an issue at ceramah gatherings. Race and religion are likely to continue to be the selling point.

What is certain is that the majority of PAS leaders are not competent enough to talk about the economy, let alone negotiate in Washington DC.

In Singapore, government leaders are often cautious and measured in their speeches, preferring to assure and comfort their people. However, during the recent campaigning, Wong framed these developments not as distant economic shifts, but as immediate national concerns.

In simple language he frightened the voters sufficiently to send the message that they have to vote for PAP as an experienced and steady party in government, and that it was not the time to be politically adventurous.

Wong went on the offensive by tying renewed US tariffs directly to Singapore’s domestic wellbeing – highlighting potential disruptions to supply chains, cost of living pressures, and long-term economic competitiveness.

More critically, he used these threats to draw a stark contrast between his administration’s seasoned leadership and what he portrayed as the untested alternatives offered by the opposition.

The key points were on Singapore’s position in an increasingly unstable world, keeping jobs, a lower economic growth, and inflation – but also how to keep Singapore economically relevant and diplomatically balanced.

The election outcome underscored the strategy’s success: the PAP increased its vote share to 65.6% – up from 61% in 2020 – and secured 87 of 97 seats. Opposition gains remained modest, with the Workers’ Party continuing to hold a small but stable minority.

In Malaysia, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has spoken widely on the tariff issues and even convened a special Dewan Rakyat meeting to address our lawmakers on financial support for small and medium enterprises.

Investment, Trade and Industries Minister Datuk Seri Tengku Zafrul Aziz must be commended for his regular video-clips on the tariff issues with simple, easy to understand narratives without the economic jargon.

Nurul Izzah should be judged on merit, not weight of family name


Nurul Izzah Anwar

IT IS inevitable that the question of family lineage involving Nurul Izzah Anwar would be brought up by her detractors even before she has made any announcement on whether she will make a bid for the party’s number two post.

The huge open endorsement by the leaders of the Parti Keadilan Rakyat for her has created much excitement.

Until yesterday, the expectation was that incumbent deputy president Datuk Rafizi Ramli would be challenged by Pakatan Harapan secretary-general Datuk Saifuddin Nasution Ismail.

But as the clock ticks away, there has been no word from the Home Minister if there would be another bid to fight Rafizi following his failed attempt in the 2022 party polls.

It has spurred party leaders to push Nurul, the former Permatang Pauh MP, to take on Rafizi.

The talk for Nurul Izzah to contest the deputy president post has reignited the same tired discussion – is this a form of nepotism?

The only argument against her is just one – she is the daughter of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, the current Prime Minister and party president. Nothing else.

No one including her critics questions her abilities, principles and hard-work. She does not push her weight across unlike some political personalities who think the family name is an entitlement.

Without holding any government positions, she has quietly shouldered the party work as well as her activism.

She has championed issues often overlooked — educational equity, women’s empowerment, technical and vocational education and training, institutional reform and the plight of the Palestinians.

So, the attacks against her deserve deeper scrutiny. It assumes, wrongly, that familial ties automatically disqualify a person from public leadership, regardless of merit, sacrifice, or contribution. That assumption is both unjust and undemocratic.

Nurul Izzah Anwar is not new to the political arena. She did not arrive at this moment by shortcut or favour.

She entered politics at a time when her father was imprisoned, not in power. In short, at a time when not many wanted to join PKR.

She stood in difficult constituencies, such as Lembah Pantai, against formidable odds.

Nurul Izzah was thrust into politics, at the age of 18, took to street protests and earned the moniker “Puteri Reformasi” when Anwar was jailed on trumped up charges.

It would be grossly unfair that capable individuals like her are denied the right to do more simply because of political lineage or to withdraw from holding posts in public service.

As one report put it, this is not how democracy should work. We should judge candidates not by who they are related to, but by what they have done, what they stand for, and what they aspire to achieve.

Nepotism is when individuals are handed power without merit, accountability, or process, it added.

If Nurul Izzah has been sitting at home, watching Korean TV dramas and just being a homemaker, oblivious to politics and the party, and then suddenly is asked to contest the deputy president post because of her family name, then it is clear cut nepotism.

She is contesting, not inheriting, if it happens, and it won’t be an easy contest.

Nurul Izzah has to win the post and not be appointed. The decision lies with the members of her party, through a proper democratic election.

As a candidate, she must be assessed, evaluated, commended or even criticised based on her ideas, record, and vision. Not because of her name, but because of her merit.

But here is the irony – criticism of her family lineage did not surface when she was said to defend her vice-president post but suddenly it changed, among her critics, when it is just a notch up.

But more importantly, Nurul Izzah has offered hope to young voters with her decision.

Bringing honour back to honorifics


Kudos to the police and MACC for acting against these corrupt VVIPs. — The Star

EVERY time a titled person, usually a Datuk or Datuk Seri, is arrested and is investigated by the authorities, many of us in the media would get calls from people who want to find out who has been snared.

It is a standard practice, both by the media and enforcement agencies, not to name the person implicated at the investigations stage.

It’s only when these people are finally charged in the courts that their identities may be revealed along with the details of the charges.

There is really nothing in the law to stop the media, the police or Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission from naming people under investigation or who have been remanded.

But it is fairly common for suspects to be arrested and later released with no charges being pressed against them despite the raids that hit the headlines.

These could be due to lack of sufficient evidence or because the prosecutors do not wish to proceed. Suspects also sometimes become prosecution witnesses against a bigger target.

But there are exceptions if the cases involve high profile personalities and the cases are of public interest.

Former prime minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaacob is one example. He has been openly named as a suspect in the case where over RM170mil in assets were seized from several “safe houses”.

However, with social media, the names of suspects in various cases have gone viral with unsubstantiated information and allegations, and from unknown sources.

People who post such allegations do not have to face legal implications unlike the established media.

There is another unprecedented case. In my over 40 years as a journalist, I have never come across so many Tan Sris being arrested at one time over one case.

Last week, a third Tan Sri was nabbed over his alleged involvement in the Mobility Beyond Imagination (MBI) investment scam.

The 53-year-old man was detained at about 2am on May 1 in Penang after he returned from abroad.

His name had been circulating for weeks among the media and some reporters had prematurely reported his arrest.

The well-known developer has been reported by the press to be a proxy for a syndicate as well as a business partner of some of the suspects. It is claimed he received profits from the investment scam for money laundering purposes.

Previously it was reported that another Tan Sri, said to be a Kedahan, and a Datuk Seri were arrested under Ops Northern Star, which has now seen the seizure of RM3.5bil in assets linked to the MBI investment scheme, including a hotel and durian plantations.

A Rolls Royce belonging to the Tan Sri, known to be close to political personalities in the Kedah state government, is said to have been seized, and 299 bank accounts with RM123,614,594 frozen.

Titled lawyers from Penang have also been nabbed by the police over the case.

In March, another Tan Sri, a chairman of a public listed company, was arrested for alleged involvement in a RM10mil scam – it was claimed the money would be handed over to the police to resolve money laundering cases.

The prominent Chinese community figure has since stepped down from his posts in the oil and gas company. This case is, however, not related to the MBI scam.

In all fairness, none of these Tan Sris, who were given these high titles for their purported contributions to the country and community, have been charged yet.

Last year, the late Tun Daim Zainuddin was charged with failing to declare his assets but the former Finance Minister was freed of the charge after his demise.

Former PM Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin is also facing abuse of power and money laundering charges.

We have lost count of lesser ones – those with Datuk and Datuk Seri titles – who have been jailed.

The most famous one, of course, is our former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak who has been convicted and is now serving his jail sentence.

He remains a Datuk Seri because not all the state Rulers have revoked his title. In 2022, Selangor and Penang revoked the titles awarded to Najib.

His wife, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor, who was awarded the Datin Paduka Seri title by the Selangor Ruler in 2005, also had her title taken back after being convicted by the Kuala Lumpur High Court in 2022 on three charges of soliciting and accepting bribes.

Malaysians are no longer surprised by the increasing number of titled Malaysians facing arrests and convictions, mostly involving criminal offences ranging from corruption and money laundering to abuse of power and fraud.

These developments are causing public concern and raising questions over the integrity of the honorific system, the accountability of the elite, and the broader implications for governance and public trust in Malaysia.

Malaysia’s honorific titles are bestowed by federal and state rulers as recognition for service, contributions to the country, or achievements in various fields.

Titles like Datuk, Datuk Seri, and Tan Sri confer a degree of prestige and societal standing.

However, in recent years, there has been a proliferation of such titles, sometimes granted in questionable circumstances or seemingly with little regard for merit or public service.

Their service, achievement, and leadership have become tainted or even meaningless in the face of moral and legal decay.

Let’s face it. The huge number of titled Malaysians have taken the shine off these awards.

Some states like Selangor, Johor, Perak, and Sarawak have always limited their number of awards.

Selangor even stipulates a minimum age for recipients and a maximum number of awards.

Rightly or wrongly, some states seem to be too generous in their awards, giving rise to various allegations, unproven of course, but which have nevertheless eroded public confidence in the system’s integrity.

It suggests that the mechanism for vetting honourees may be flawed, and that wealth, political connections, or influence can overshadow character and ethical behaviour.

There is a need to examine the award process, a clear and standard revocation method, serious enforcement by the police, and integrity at all levels.

There is also an increasing number of brazen Malaysians who pass themselves off as title holders when they are not, as the Malaysian Datuk-Dato Council would be able to testify.

Kudos to the police and MACC for acting against these corrupt VVIPs. Prestige and honour should not be undermined by scandal.

The last thing we want is to see our prison wardens having to address their inmates as YB, when they have already lost the right.

PAP set, but opposition eyes gains

IT’S a foregone conclusion that the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) will win the Singapore general election taking place tomorrow and retain its reign as government.

But what is different from the previous 13 polls is that the opposition is believed to have a better chance of increasing its seats and popular votes this time.

The voices of discontentment, which range from the increasing cost of living to the class divide, expensive healthcare, and housing availability in one of the world’s most expensive cities, have grown louder.

Even the increasing number of highly paid expatriates, especially bankers, has become an issue in the heartland.

Angry Singaporeans complain of government leaders, who may be highly educated but are perceived to be detached from the ordinary folks struggling to pay their bills.

These frustrations have been amplified through social media by the younger voters, who are more open with their grouses, unlike the older generation in the past.

The “uncles and aunties” at food courts are grumbling that their “cheng hoo” (government in Hokkien, the common dialect among the predominant Chinese group) is not listening hard enough.

There is a perception that voters, especially the young, are now more willing to embrace diverse politics with stronger opposition voices and ideas.

In short, the PAP monopoly with its tested political and economic stability line may not be enough for the digital generation.

There is no danger of the PAP losing a two-thirds majority or even losing a substantial number of seats.

Its biggest rival, the Workers’ Party, which has 10 seats, is competing for only 26 seats.

The third party from the previous parliament, the Progress Singapore Party, is contesting only 13 seats.

With 97 parliamentary seats to be decided, five have already gone to the PAP because it is running unopposed in one multi-member constituency.

Multi-member constituencies were created to enable multi-racial candidates of up to six from each party to be fielded, aimed at ensuring representation from various races.

A total of 211 candidates are contesting in the elections, with 46% from PAP.

The opposition are split, with 11 parties competing.

There are 33 constituencies, 17 of which are multi-member and 15 single-member, and only five constituencies will be contested by more than two parties.

Reuters reported that PAP’s share of the popular vote fell to 61% in 2020 from 70% in 2015.

“If it sees another decline and the opposition Workers’ Party builds on its record 10 seats in 2020, it could be interpreted as a sign that after six decades in charge, the PAP’s mandate and grip on power are slowly weakening.

“With a track record of good governance, attracting investment and ensuring stability of the trade-reliant economy, the PAP remains the dominant force in Singapore politics with resources that dwarf its opponents and a big party membership to draw from.”

Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who was premier for two decades, warned at a PAP rally on Sunday that opposition seat gains would “weaken the ruling party’s ability to govern” and result in the loss of experienced ministers, it said.

The test isn’t just on the PAP, which has won every poll since the island republic’s independence in 1965, but on the leadership of the new Prime Minister Lawrence Wong.

He needs a solid mandate to prove his mantle, but a drop in the popular votes and an increase on the opposition bench would not be a signal that he wants.

For Malaysians, the elections across the Causeway have never been exciting.

In fact, the Malaysian media provide little coverage, as they do not see any excitement.

There is unlikely to be a realistic “Ini Kali Lah”, although the opposition has touted, “Can we change history?” as its rallying cry.

There has been a massive crowd at rallies in some constituencies, but how much of it will be translated into real votes will be answered this Saturday.

Will the majority of Singaporeans remain “kia cheng hoo” (afraid of the government) and “kiasi” (afraid to be in trouble), or will they surprise the world?

The voting centres close at 8pm, and results will be late if they are tight in some areas.

Stay tuned.

A message of harmony for Easter


IT is common practice for our leaders and some Rulers to issue statements marking the festivals celebrated by Malaysians, including religious ones, as a mark of respect and commitment to our diversity.

But last week, something out of the usual happened. Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim posted a Good Friday and Easter message.

In my 40-year experience in the media, very seldom has a prime minister issued such an announcement, although it has been a common practice of Sarawakian and Sabahan leaders.

Easter is considered more important than Christmas in Christian theology because it celebrates the resurrection of Jesus Christ, which is the cornerstone of the faith.

Christmas is beloved for its themes of peace and joy, but there is nothing in the Bible that says Jesus was born on Dec 25. On the other hand, Easter is the climax of the story and the most important date.

Anwar’s message is not just another statement but a deep commitment to diversity and compassion at a time when religious and racial elements have raised their ugly heads with toxic narratives, especially on social media.

His message was an apt reminder that the leadership embraces inclusivity and unity, and that while Christians are a minority in Malaysia, we are not forgotten. The Christians do form a huge group in Sabah and Sarawak.

In his Easter greetings to our Christian community, he urged citizens to nurture “a spirit of love and mutual respect” and to celebrate Malaysia’s diversity as a source of strength, stating: “May the harmony we enjoy continue to flourish, and may our diverse society remain a source of strength and unity.”

In a particularly poignant gesture, he also expressed his condolences to the Holy See and all Catholics over the passing of Pope Francis.

Anwar’s message, through his heartfelt condolences, has also not gone unnoticed as it showcased his unwavering commit-ment to interfaith harmony and national unity.

Malaysia is a nation rich in cultural and religious diversity, and the Prime Minister’s message sends a powerful signal – one that affirms the role of every community in the fabric of the nation.

By reaching out to the Christian community during one of their holiest times and addressing the spiritual leader of the Catholic Church with dignity and compassion, Anwar reaffirmed Malaysia’s foundational values of mutual respect and coexistence.

Anwar, in his tribute to Francis, described him as a “steadfast advocate for peace, and his efforts to build bridges across faiths and cultures earned the respect of many, including in the Muslim world.

“He spoke with moral clarity on the immense suffering in Gaza, reminding the world that we must show the same compassion to all victims of violence, whatever they may be.’’


The reaction to the PM’s missive has been positive.

Media personality Daphne Iking wrote: “As a Muslim convert who was once a Catholic, I found your message deeply moving YAB Dato’ Seri. Thank you for your thoughtful and inclusive words.

“They meant a lot – not just to me personally, but to many who came from different faith journeys. It’s a reminder of the compassion and unity we should continue to nurture in our beloved Malaysia.’’

Then there is anastasiasoniasio who posted: “Beautiful tribute. Thank you PMX. May God bless our country Malaysia”, while awangfa30 wrote: “Beautifully written and sincerely written, Dato’ Seri”, with virgelaugustine adding “this was very beautifully written and thank you for highlighting the impact he had on you and the rest of the community too’’.

We must never take for granted such festive messages, and even during sad occasions, as such actions go beyond symbolic gestures.

They build trust, foster understanding, and nurture a collective national identity grounded in empathy and shared humanity.

They are a reminder of the strength found in Malaysian unity. Do not let the loud sound of a small group of myopic, polarising politicians and keyboard cowards – they are certainly not warriors – depress us.

They will surely become more intimidating in the months ahead as the general election needs to be held in 2027.

Not many of us would dare to stand up publicly against these racial and religious tyrants but rest assured that the majority of us will know what to do when we cast our votes. Most of us will want to keep Malaysia tolerant and peaceful.

Anwar’s recent statements serve as both a tribute to a revered spiritual leader, even though a Christian, and a reaffirmation of his own vision: a Malaysia – and a world – where mutual respect and compassion light the path forward.

Malaysia needs leaders who build bridges, not burn them.

Hello, Malaysians Are Not Starving, More Like Overeating


KUALA LUMPUR, April 25 (Bernama) — I have bad news for American commentator Bill O’Reilly, who thinks that Malaysians are barely eating, as a follow-up to his earlier rant that Malaysians are poor in his attempt to ridicule President Xi Jinping’s visit to Malaysia.

We are not starving as you want to believe. Our problem is that we are overeating. We eat even though we aren’t hungry. We just have too much good food.

The 75-year-old newsman has suggested that with our lower per capita income, it will be hard for Malaysians to even buy a small hat from China, as the United States household per capita income is eight times as much as Malaysia.

“You’re not getting Chinese take-out either in Kuala Lumpur. You’re barely eating. So, Prime Minister (Anwar), I wish you the best,” he said in a YouTube video.

He doesn’t deserve a response from Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim or any of our Cabinet Ministers for his latest condescending remark.

Last week, Anwar had rebuked O’Reilly for his recent remark on Malaysia and Southeast Asia, calling his statement both arrogant and ignorant.

The Prime Minister said the comment not only reflects O’Reilly’s lack of understanding of the current realities in Southeast Asia but also reveals a narrow worldview shaped by racial bias and colonialist ideology.

But we can’t let O’Reilly off without another response, can we?

It’s ironic that he is ranting that Malays or Malaysians are poor and starving, while the media, including the South China Morning Post, are reporting that Malaysia is a food-obsessed nation.

The Hong Kong-based news organisation described Malaysians as an overeating population, with half of its adults being overweight.

The reality is that there has been a surge in the number of overweight and obese Malaysians in the past decade, according to the National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2023.

On Friday, Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad said Malaysians were overeating and indulging in heavy late-night meals.

A Health Ministry’s survey also showed that a large number of Malaysians, including 41.8 per cent of adolescents and 33.5 per cent of adults, consume heavy suppers at least once a week.

It’s not something that Malaysians are proud of, but we simply have too much good food. Even tourists come to Malaysia for its diverse and delicious array of food.

Malaysia is not called the haven for food for no good reason, with CNN constantly picking Malaysia as a food destination.

O’Reilly has made it a point to say that he has visited Malaysia before, but he did not say when.

And again, he put his foot into his mouth when he made another error during the same video, claiming that former US president Barack Obama was partially raised in Malaysia.

What is factual is that Obama, who served as US President from 2009 to 2017, spent part of his childhood in Indonesia. Hello, it’s Indonesia, not Malaysia! Well, O’Reilly, do your research.

Newsweek has reported that Americans are feeling poorer because they are getting poorer.

USA Today has reported that a survey, published April 21, found that 53 per cent of Americans believe that their personal financial situation is getting worse.

The last available figures, as in 2023, showed that 12.6 per cent of US residents or an average of 42.1 million people per month are on food stamps, which provides for food-purchasing assistance for people with low or no-income persons.

The average American is struggling with their household bills, as they become poorer, and it’s the American elites, who are in power, and the media, like O’Reilly, who cannot see it or refuse to see it.

These vulnerable Americans wouldn’t be buying a hat, not just because it’s not an essential item.

It’s also because they are simply struggling to put food on the table.

The Malaysian Vote in the Election of the New Pope


KUALA LUMPUR, April 22 (Bernama) — The next Pope will be chosen by the College of Cardinals, the Catholic church’s most senior priests, following the demise of Pope Francis and out of these 135 electors, there is a Malaysian.

These cardinals, who are eligible to vote, are making their way for the conclave, which comes from the Latin word cum clave, meaning the “the key” indicating the closed, if not secretive, process of electing a Pope.

Johor-born Datuk Seri Sebastian Francis will join his counterparts from various parts of the world for the voting.

The 73-year-old priest, who now resides in Penang, has been the Bishop of Penang since 2011.

He was elevated to the rank of Cardinal in Sept 2023 by Francis. He is the second cardinal from Malaysia after the late Anthony Soter Fernandez.

Past Malaysian Catholic Lawyers Association president Datuk Joy Appukuttan said during Francis’ term, “We have seen a large number of cardinals appointed from smaller nations.

“Malaysia and Singapore stand out. Our (Cardinal Sebastian) Francis is one of them and will have to attend the conclave soon,’’ he said.

Another source said, “Cardinal Sebastian is on his way to Rome for the selection of the new Pope.’’

The Penang Diocese, in an entry on its website, described Francis’s personal belief is that “one must have good human and emotional maturity and balance, always be open to creative thinking, inclusive of all, especially ethic, racial and religious differences.”

The Guardian reported that there are more than 250 cardinals from more than 90 countries, but only about 135 are cardinal electors (those over the age of 80 are excluded).

“About 110 of the cardinal electors have been chosen by Francis in the past 10 years and largely reflect his vision of a more inclusive church.

“Once the cardinals are assembled in Rome, usually 15-20 days after the pope’s death, they gather under Michelangelo’s magnificent painted ceiling in the Sistine Chapel to begin their deliberations.

“After the words extra omnes – everyone out – are declared, referring to all but voting cardinals and a handful of officials and doctors, the doors are locked. 

“The cardinals swear an oath of absolute secrecy, and are permitted no contact with the outside world for the duration of the election process. Their phones are removed, and no newspapers, television, letters or messages are allowed. The chapel is also swept for listening devices before and during the conclave,” it said.

The votes are taken until a candidate wins a two-thirds majority, which means there will be elimination rounds.

While the ballot is secret, The Guardian said “that does not mean the process is immune from factionalising, intrigue and lobbying.”

After each round of voting, the ballot cards are burned with black smoke emerging from the 60ft chimney, indicating an inconclusive ballot; white smoke announces to the world that a new pope has been elected. The election has received global attention because the Pope is regarded as the leader of 1.37 billion Catholics.

Francis, an Argentine, who became the first Latin American pope, spoke up for social justice, environmental issues as well as the Palestinian cause.

During his Easter Sunday address last week, he expressed his “closeness to the sufferings of Christians in Palestine and Israel, and all the Israeli people and the Palestinian people.”

He constantly criticised Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip, particularly the killing of Palestinians, and in one video posted on social media, he was seen making a call to the Catholic priests in Palestine to enquire about their well-being amidst the attacks.

A laughable American malaise


FIRST, US Vice-President JD Vance found himself being rebuked – for his disrespectful comments about “Chinese peasants”.

In a recent interview, when speaking about the effects of the Trump Administration’s tariffs, he said the US “borrows money from Chinese peasants to buy the things those Chinese peasants manufacture.’’

As expected, it earned a quick rebuttal from the Chinese Foreign Ministry while the Chinese social media set Vance on fire for his remarks.

Then came Conservative talk show personality, Bill O’Reilly, who arrogantly suggested that President Xi Jinping had wasted his time with his South-East Asian tour, which included Malaysia.

In a typical display of haughtiness and ignorance, O’Reilly claimed Xi was “wasting his time in South-East Asia because the Malays have no money.”

We do not know if the 75-year-old newsman used the term “Malays” to refer to Malaysians in general, or to pin-point the Malay-majority population of Malaysia, or even the broader ethnic group found across South-East Asia.

But it is safe to assume that he had in mind the population of Malaysia. It also indicated his lack of knowledge of Malaysia’s diversity.

Like many Americans, he has probably never set foot in Malaysia and South-East Asia. His perception of Asians is probably based on Hollywood movies where the white man is always sweating away in noisy, crowded Asian market places, where, for some reason, everyone is using chopsticks.

It doesn’t matter which Asian city it is, it is always chopsticks.

To his feeble mind, we are just Third World people living in slums who can’t even afford our next meal.

Well, is that a surprise? No. It has been reported that although the majority of Americans have travelled abroad at least once, a significant percentage (27%) have never left their country.

The report said the degree of international travel experience varies widely among Americans, with only 11% having visited 10 or more foreign countries.

So, it is very likely that the average American would not know what Asean is. They may know about Singapore or Thailand, but Malaysia could well be Mars for many.

O’Reilly’s remarks not only reflect a gross misunderstanding of South-East Asian geopolitics but also insults millions of Malaysians and their South-East Asian neighbours who have built vibrant, culturally rich, and economically growing nations.

To reduce their global significance to mere economic labels is not only simplistic but also racially charged.

I am proud of Malaysia. So are most of us. We take the trouble to explain the location of our small country to foreigners when we are abroad.

The reality is that Malaysia is a middle-income country with a diversified economy that spans electronics, petroleum, palm oil, tourism, and increasingly, digital services.

Malaysia is certainly not a “shit-hole country”, as Donald Trump infamously referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador in an interview in 2018.

Malaysia’s economy grew by 5% in the fourth quarter of 2024, with a 5.4% growth recorded in the previous quarter.

Overall, Malaysia’s economy grew at 5.1% (2023:3.6%) in 2024, with a value of RM1.93 trillion at current prices and RM1.65 trillion at constant prices.

Gross national income per capita increased by 3.6% to RM54,894 from a marginal decrease of 0.2% (RM52,991) in 2023.

Kuala Lumpur and Penang are home to a thriving tech scene and a growing number of start-ups, not to mention some of the tallest and most iconic buildings in the world.

The Straits of Malacca remains one of the busiest shipping lanes on the planet, making it geopolitically indispensable.

Our streets are safe. No one gets shot in schools. The metro stations are clean, bright and the trains run on time. No graffiti covers the walls of the stations.

Our streets are not filled with homeless people and the zombie druggies found in many American cities.

That’s Malaysia for you.

To call Malays “poor” is not just misleading; it shows a lack of understanding of socio-economic dynamics and how wealth and development are measured.

While challenges like rural poverty remain, as they do in the US, Malaysia has made remarkable progress in human development, infrastructure, and education.

For O’Reilly to suggest that Xi is merely “waiting” in South-East Asia implies that the region is a passive playground for global powers.

Asean is made up of 10 member states – with Timor Leste coming in next – playing a critical but neutral role in regional security, economic integration, and multilateral diplomacy.

Malaysia is clear about the US and China. Both are important trading partners. We will give an equally grand welcome to Trump if he comes to KL.

In fact, Asean leaders are ready to travel to Washington DC to meet Trump to engage with him. But China is our neighbour. It’s just a four-hour flight from KL to Beijing, and from Kota Kinabalu to Hainan, it’s less than two hours. That’s how close we are to each other.

Regular visitors would know how far China has advanced and how it has lifted its people out of poverty.

The US, meanwhile, continues to lag behind in many sectors because it continues to think it is superior.

China’s engagement in Asean is a strategic economic and diplomatic initiative aimed at expanding influence, often through soft power, trade, and infrastructure investment under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

O’Reilly’s condescending view of South-East Asians is both analytically weak and morally offensive.

As one report said: “O’Reilly’s remarks are laced with cultural superiority. Such commentary doesn’t just diminish the credibility of the speaker – it also poisons public discourse with half-truths and prejudice.”

O’Reilly really should get off his moral high horse, especially since he is someone who has faced – and settled – multi-million-dollar sexual harassment suits with at least six women. It reportedly totalled US$45mil (RM198.3mil).

The hilarity of it all was highlighted by one “Rep Jack Kimble”, who had the world in stitches when he tweeted that “we aren’t the only beef supplier in the world, but China isn’t the only huge country either.

“If they’re going to pivot from us, we should do the same and start selling more of our beef to India.’’

He then went on to follow up with: “Okay, I may have misspoken. It seems exporting beef to India is going to be tough with certain Hindu beliefs.

“However, instead of selling our cattle that way, what if we ransomed them off? How much would India pay if we’d let it go?”

This “Republican Congressman” is fictional and the account is fake but his remarks cleverly parodied the attitude of people like O’Reilly, who is not just ignorant but also obnoxious.

And we all remember Pete Hegseth, the Defence Secretary, who was stumped when asked about Asean during his confirmation hearing in Senate in January. He could not name a single member country of Asean.

That kind of ignorance would be downright comical, if it weren’t so serious.

Facing the disorder in Trump’s order


United front: Effective negotiation with the US is the top priority but Asean regional solidarity is also essential. — Reuters

IT’S a short relief as US President Donald Trump pressed the pause button on his sweeping tariffs, but as the world knows by now, he is totally unpredictable.

We never know what’s coming and the 90-day reprieve Trump has announced will only help give us some breathing room to navigate the next storm.

When announcing his tariffs for more than 180 countries – on top of a blanket 10% duty on almost all imports to the United States – Trump spared Malaysia’s semiconductor industry, a critical sector which accounts for 22.8% of Malaysia’s US-bound exports.

While the industry is exempted from tariffs for now, no one will dare to say for how long.

The national Geo Economic Command Centre, headed by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, will meet again tomorrow to plan its moves.

There is certainly much urgency at the Prime Minister’s Office in Putrajaya.

The leaders of each country have adopted different approaches and methods on how best they can cut a deal with Trump and reassure their domestic concerns and interests.

How about Malaysia? What will it do about the 24% tariff that has been imposed on it?

The Anwar leadership has adopted the “resilience, not retaliation” approach, recognising the fact that we are just a small trading country.

We are in no position to stand up against the mighty Americans, and that is not our plan anyway.

China is perhaps the only country that has decided, and which dares, to take on the US with retaliatory measures as the world looks on helplessly at the two economic giants battling it out.

Both the US and China are among our top trading partners, with Malaysia continuously emphasising that we will remain neutral between these two nations.

Malaysia knows its position. So we must take a prudent approach.

However, remaining calm does not mean not doing anything.

As analyst Dr Rais Hussin wrote, Malaysia has helped to contain the shock, preserved investor confidence, protected domestic industries, and reinforced its standing as a proponent of rules-based trade.

“Against this backdrop, Malaysia’s decision to remain measured sends a stabilising signal to global investors.

“Amid rising protectionist rhetoric, a predictable, rules-based environment becomes increasingly appealing,’’ he wrote.

The Anwar administration has rightly implemented a multi- faceted strategy to mitigate the impact of the tariff imposed by focusing on diplomatic engagement, economic resilience, and regional cooperation.

Calls have already been made, without any fanfare or publicity, to key American officials and influential figures.

Investment, Trade and Industry Minister Datuk Seri Tengku Zafrul Aziz, who chaired the Asean Economic Ministers’ meeting last week, said Malaysia hopes to secure regional consensus to face the burdens and to take a more solid stance as a group.

Various Asean members, notably Vietnam and Cambodia, have been slapped with much higher tariffs than Malaysia, and some argue that they would require different approaches.

The hardest hit are Cambodia (49%), Laos (48%), Vietnam (46%), Myanmar (44%) and Thailand (36%). Brunei is in a similar predicament as Malaysia at 24%, while Philippines (17%) and Singapore, facing a baseline tariff of 10%, are a bit better off.

The question is whether Trump will want to talk to Asean as a bloc or would prefer to deal individually with each country.

Malaysia, as the Chair of Asean now, remains committed to cooperating with member countries in reducing disruptions, strengthening economic resilience, and fighting for a balanced and stable trade relationship.

At the same time, Malaysia is leveraging the Malaysia-US Trade and Investment Framework Agreement to negotiate exemptions and address trade imbalances.

Certainly, we must step up our commitment to seeking solutions through continuous engagement with the White House.

More than ever, we need our Malaysian ambassador to Washington DC to be in place as soon as possible. The career diplomat, who has yet to be officially named, has already been endorsed by His Majesty, the King of Malaysia. It would be good if his credentials are accepted by the US soon.

Tengku Zafrul has also announced plans to lead a delegation to Washington DC to discuss the tariff.

At the same time, Malaysia has begun to engage in a diversification of partnerships to actively expand relations with other nations and seek trade opportunities.

This includes leveraging Malaysia’s role in multilateral trade agreements to reduce reliance on any single market.

As the saying goes, there is an opportunity in every crisis. This is the time for Malaysia to accelerate economic reforms to strengthen fundamentals and enhance resilience against external shocks.

Malaysia is also utilising regional agreements like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership to diversify trade and reduce reliance on the US market.

It is important that the country embraces multiculturalism to sidestep geopolitical crossfires and fast track opening new markets.

Certainly, our partnership in BRICS with its emerging market economies, namely Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa is a big help.

Likewise, for the first time, Asean heads of government will meet with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and China as part of the Asean Malaysia 2025 programme. The GCC comprises the powerful Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and United Arab Emirates.

The bottom line is that while Malaysia’s non-confrontational multifaceted approach aims to minimise immediate damage, long-term risks remain, including potential supply chain reconfigurations and reduced foreign investment.

Effective negotiation with the US is the top priority but Asean regional solidarity is also essential.

As Asean leaders prepare to meet in Kuala Lumpur next month, everyone understands the need to adapt to shifting global trade dynamics as disorder becomes the norm now.

In tragedy, a message of hope


Unity in action: Aaron shared this photo of a Muslim man performing his prayers at the Sri Maha Kaliamman Temple that opened its gates to victims and rescuers during the fire in Putra Heights. The Unity Minister praised the spirit of unity among Malaysians who reached out in various ways to help. — Pic provided

IT was heartwarming, but it was not something extraordinary, at least not in Malaysia.

Malaysians have always come together to help each other in times of need.

Unity in crisis has always been a hallmark of this country. And it was clear again in Putra Heights this past week.

We have to ignore the toxic racist social media rants, and the venomous statements by some politicians and narcissistic influencers who have made a name for themselves by making inflammatory remarks.

They claim to be champions of their race and religions but do we see them when help is needed the most?

A few days ago, the gas pipeline explosion at Putra Heights, Selangor, shocked the nation as most of us have not seen such a massive fire before.

The media labelled it a “monster fire” and it was a miracle that no one died.

It is also most unfortunate that the incident took place on the second day of Hari Raya, when the nation was celebrating this holy festival.

But ironically, the spirit of the nation was lifted even during this tragic incident, as we saw Malaysian humanity shining bright.

Ordinary people of all races and religions who lived nearby and in other parts of Selangor and Kuala Lumpur, turned up to offer their assistance to the over 500 victims, showcasing the true spirit of Malaysia.

Our men and women in uniform – the police, firefighters and the volunteers, civil defence rescue units, the medical teams and others – turned up swiftly to put out the inferno and to help.

Many of them would have been celebrating Hari Raya too, but they readily left their homes and families to perform their duties.

The Putra Heights Mosque turned its multipurpose hall into a temporary relief centre, sheltering victims whose homes were damaged in the fire.

The Sri Maha Kaliamman Temple did the same, opening its gates immediately upon hearing the blast and quickly setting up a makeshift medical base.

At both these places of worship, no one was turned away. Food and water was distributed to everybody. Restaurants nearby also readily offered free meals to victims and help providers.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim singled out the mosque and temple committees for praise for providing temporary shelter for the victims.

“This is how we do things; where there is a problem, we will work together and solve it,” he said.

The same sentiments were expressed by Unity Minister Datuk Aaron Ago Dagang, who said religious diversity was not a barrier to unity but a strength that brings people together.

Malaysia needs leaders who readily speak up for national unity and diversity.

Such a narrative is important to remind Malaysians that the silent majority who care for the nation and their fellow citizens is actually larger than the loud minority who like to think that they speak for the rest of us.

One particularly moving report from the tragedy was that of an elderly Chinese shopkeeper who donated hundreds of bottles of water to firefighters, mostly Malays, battling the blaze.

There is also a heartwarming picture of a Muslim man, possibly a rescuer, performing his prayers at the temple.

It was also surely uplifting to see viral pictures of rescuers comforting the frightened dogs and cats left behind in homes or that had fled when the loud explosion occurred.

In some homes, the owners had balik kampung and the animals were home alone while the owners were away.

The Society For the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) Selangor set up its operations base at the Putra Heights Dewan Camelia and then relocated to the temple, making it its coordination and relief post.

The total number of animals retrieved and treated after four days was 44 cats, seven dogs, and even two snakes. Unfortunately two dogs and a cat died.


Furry friends were not forgotten amidst the disaster. An officer from the Shah Alam Volunteer Fire Brigade, Datuk Dr Ken Foo (left), and his teammate rescued two pet dogs from three houses that caught fire. Many volunteers came forward to help with injured and lost pets. – Bernama

Fatimah Zaharah Rahim, who volunteers with several animal NGOs, spoke about her exhaustion after rescuing the animals, saying, “This is the second day and I haven’t slept for nearly 40 hours.

“I am not just helping animals but also people who need help.’’

These are the unsung heroes of Malaysia who asked for nothing in return. They were there not for the limelight. They had just one purpose – to help their fellow Malaysians in need.

Social media certainly played a crucial role in mobilising aid, with people offering transportation, financial support, and even opening their homes for victims to stay in temporarily.

The pictures of the mosque, temple, and rescuers uploaded by people were inspiring.

Medical professionals also volunteered their services, treating minor injuries, and offering counselling to those in distress, while lawyers showed up to offer legal assistance.

My media colleagues also shared with me stories of young people, youth groups, university students, and animal rights activists who collaborated to distribute aid efficiently.

Malaysians are often disheartened when they read racially-laced negative rhetoric, but what took place at Putra Heights shows that ordinary Malaysians can be relied on to remind us that we can live together.

They don’t need to be told that compassion, regardless of whatever faith, knows no boundaries.

Paradoxical as it may seem, it took an unfortunate incident to wake us up to the fact that Malaysians, if left on their own, will always carry the message of hope and unity.