Author Archives: wcw

Budget 2023 expected to be tabled on Oct 7


KUALA LUMPUR: The Budget, scheduled to be tabled on Oct 28, will now be held earlier.

It is now expected to be presented in the Dewan Rakyat on Oct 7 – three weeks earlier than scheduled.

The Cabinet, which met on Friday (Aug 26), was informed of the decision by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob.

The decision is regarded as an indication that the general election will be held soon.

Barisan Nasional officials, in reacting to the news, said the Parliament could be dissolved after the Budget is tabled.

Finance Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz will present the Budget when the Dewan meets again on Oct 3.

Following the Cabinet’s directive, the next step will be to inform Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Azhar Azizan Harun, who needs at least 28 days to inform the Members of Parliament of the new date.

The decision to hold an earlier Budget is being made ahead of the special Umno meeting on Saturday (Aug 27) where leaders are expected to push for a general election to be held soon.

The present Parliament term ends in July 2023.

Barisan leaders said Parliament could be dissolved after the Budget is tabled.

”Political developments are moving very fast as the GE tempo will now be accelerated,” said one Barisan leader.

A peek into prison life


Kajang Prison.

KAJANG Prison is located right in the middle of this town in Selangor, about 40km away from Kuala Lumpur.

No new visitors to Kajang, in the Hulu Langat district, would miss the imposing medium-security prison building.

It is now home to Datuk Seri Najib Razak, the first Malaysian prime minister to be jailed.

The former premier is one of more than 5,000 prisoners there as at July 2022.

Like all Malaysian prisons, this facility is overcrowded, but it is surprisingly clean and well-maintained.

Our senior prison wardens are even sent overseas to learn from others on how to manage these facilities.

I had the opportunity of visiting both the Kajang and Sungai Buloh prisons several times, where I was allowed access to most parts of these centres in the company of the wardens, to see for myself what the situation there is really like.

I was invited to give motivational talks to the inmates and on one occasion, was even asked to help an inmate facing natural life imprisonment to obtain a royal pardon.

He had served 28 years by then. He was a model prisoner who ran a church service at Kajang Prison.

For a start, it’s nothing like the prisons we see in American TV dramas.

There are no double-decker beds for our inmates. They sleep on the cement floor, on standard latex mattresses that are about 5cm thick.

Those in the good behaviour category are rewarded with a 10cm-thick mattress.

There are about four to six persons in a cell, with a shared open toilet covered by low partial walls with no door.

They have to shower in the cell, too.

Some of the cells have no shower and inmates will have to go to a shower area, known simply as “tempat mandi”.

At Kajang, inmates are served three meals a day, starting at 7am when breakfast is served. The inmates usually have a cup of tea or coffee and a piece of bread. Lunch is around noon and dinner at about 4pm, mainly consisting of rice and curry with chicken or fish.

Former prisoners describe it as “canteen food’’. They eat in the dining hall.

At 10pm, it’s lights out.

The prison is a hot place and it feels like an oven in there.

No fans are provided in the cells. Trees are also not planted in the prison complex as they are deemed unsuitable for security purposes.

Many male inmates strip down to their underwear in the cells. In some areas, though, industrial fans are installed to allow better ventilation to reduce the unbearable heat.

Well-behaved inmates, who wear blue attire, get some form of reward like a desk and possibly a fan.

It is unlikely that Najib will share a cell with five or eight other inmates at Kajang Prison.

While VIP prisoners are expected to be treated the same as others, the prisons would certainly want them to be safe.

Based on what former inmates, wardens and non-governmental organisation visitors say, these VIP prisoners – usually former politicians, lawyers, policemen or corporate figures – would likely be assigned their own cells.

Even Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, when he was incarcerated at Sungai Buloh Prison, had his own cell, which was located near the clinic wing.

Politician Lim Guan Eng and Hindraf activist P. Uthayakumar were also held in Kajang Prison.

In both the Kajang and Sungai Buloh prisons, drug addicts and traffickers make up the largest number of inmates, with many rehabilitation programmes drawn up for them.

Unlike in the movies, the average prisoner is usually well-behaved, and they conventionally stay away from trouble.

Sexual relationships in these facilities are regarded as a crime and certainly, any sexual act or even attempting it leads to only one thing – extra prison time.

Prisoners are addressed by their numbers, NOT names, and for newcomers with titles, this certainly needs some getting used to.

Welcome to Kajang Prison.

Where Are All The Good MPs?

 

Respect the separation of powers – let the judges be

FOR God’s sake, please leave the Federal Court judges alone. The Bench should be left to discharge its duties professionally without any form of intimidation, pressure, or certainly, interference from anyone – especially the Executive.

Malaysians are not the only ones closely following developments at the apex court involving Datuk Seri Najib Razak in his final appeal in the RM42mil SRC International Sdn Bhd case.

(On July 28, 2020, the High Court convicted and sentenced Najib on seven charges involving criminal breach of trust (CBT), money laundering, and abuse of position, all involving SRC funds, totalling RM42mil. He was sentenced to 12 years in jail and a fine of RM210mil. The conviction and sentence were upheld by the Court of Appeal.)

The world is watching how we are handling this high-profile case as it involves a former prime minister, no less.

Surely, the five-member bench led by Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, who is hearing the appeal, should not be subjected to any kind of threats.

That’s not how it works.

The independence of the judiciary should not be challenged nor compromised, and over the next few days, the nation will be witnessing a defining moment.

These top judges must be free to make their decisions without fear or favour. The separation of powers in our Federal Constitution is clearly stipulated. The doctrine under which these three branches of government – the Executive, Legislative and Judicial – are kept separate is to ensure there is a system of checks and balances.

This is to ensure the government remains accountable and fair, as well as to enable each branch to act as a check on the power of the other.

It is thus a mockery, if not ignorance, when politicians suggest or expect the prime minister to intervene in a court case because they feel one of their party members should not have to face the consequences of his actions.

Deliberate acts have been carried out, in different ways and on various platforms, to embarrass the Bench with vicious insinuations hurled at the Chief Justice (and even journalists) who have written about the issue.

To be more precise, threats have been made against the CJ. To put it bluntly, it is unprecedented and shocking – words which Malaysians have now grown familiar with, thanks to certain lawyers.

Right-thinking Malaysians, regardless of their political allegiance, must stand up to voice grave concerns at what is taking place now. Politicians come and go but the institution remains.

Malaysia has been able to remain a stable and progressive nation, as we celebrate our 65th birthday, because the rule of law and order has always been upheld.

There is an established legal system in this country with the Federal Constitution recognised as the highest law of the country.

Like it or not, it is the judges who have been appointed to dispense the law and to exercise its authority.

Those facing charges are given every opportunity to challenge the decisions of the courts.

In many countries, the accused who has been sentenced to jail at the lowest court, would have been jailed immediately while going through the stages of appeal.

But here, the appellants are given bail, as in most cases, as they seek the views of the Court of Appeal and finally, a review from the Federal Court.

Malaysians who do not understand the various points of appeal have also questioned, without basis, why Najib had been allowed to roam freely. That is simply because he had not exhausted his appeals.

But the buck stops at the Federal Court, the highest court in the land, today. Everything must come to an end. Whatever decision handed down by this apex court has to and must be respected, regardless of whether we like it or not.

The grounds of their decision will be properly put in a written judgment for all to read.

Malaysia is not a half-baked Third World nation, where politicians and their apparatchik decide on the verdicts of court decisions, let’s be clear.

Leave it to the judges, please.

Guessing game over GE date continues

UNTIL a few weeks ago, many politicians and journalists were certain that Parliament would be dissolved by October although the Prime Minister is still keeping them guessing.

To avoid being caught off guard, preparations by various political parties have started.

It is speculated that the Budget, fixed for Oct 28, would be brought forward to accommodate the dissolution of the Dewan Rakyat.

While Finance Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz told the media that the tabling date of the Budget remains unchanged, the aspirant Barisan Nasional candidate has also been hitting the grounds.

He is almost always at the Kuala Selangor parliamentary constituency, where he is said to be contesting, when he is not carrying out official duties.

Umno deputy president Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan has gone on his nationwide visits to ensure the machinery is put in place.

But last week, the Prime Minister’s Office told the media that Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob would be travelling to New York from Sept 22 to 25 to attend the United Nations General Assembly.

The decision caught several Cabinet members and officials off guard as the PM would surely not be taking five days off if he was preparing for the GE.

He has also invited several Members of Parliament to accompany him on the trip, an official said.

During a meet with editors last week, for the interview on his first year as PM, he indicated that he wasn’t ready for the GE, saying the littoral combat ship (LCS) issue had now emerged, saying “we don’t know how this issue will affect our chances”.

But in the same breath, he said “the global economic forecast for next year is not encouraging. If this is the situation, would it be a good time for the election to be held next year?’’

If the Budget is to be held earlier, say by the first week of October, it means the notice would have to be served to the Speaker to inform him of the change in plan.

Under the rules, a minimum 28-day notice would be needed and based on this assumption, the notice would need to be sent by Sept 1 or 2.

That means the Dewan Rakyat can be dissolved once the Budget is tabled by the first week, and to pave the way for GE15 to be held by November.

“The impact of the Budget, which will certainly be aimed at the electorate, would be lost if it is not followed immediately by the elections.

“The PM must strike it while it is hot because like it or not, it will be regarded as a preliminary BN manifesto. To put it simply, the message is vote us back and we will put this Budget into a reality,’’ said an analyst.

By December, the monsoon period which often brings floods to many areas of the East Coast would have started and it would not be the best time to hold a GE.

The next option is to dissolve Parliament after the Chinese New Year next year, which begins on Jan 22, 2023.

Christmas, in December this year, and CNY in January would allow the PM to provide better optics for his Keluarga Malaysia concept.

There has been criticism that, so far, the turnout for his various state celebrations involved mainly Malays.

The diversity and inclusivity elements are missing and surely, to make his Keluarga Malaysia idea more meaningful, these must be seen.

Last year, he was missing from the annual Christmas high tea organised by the Christian Federation of Malaysia as he had to rush to flood-hit states.

As with the previous practices, the annual Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) examinations for Form 5 students is scheduled from the end of February to March 2023 and this means almost all schools, usually used as polling stations, would be held up for the exams.

Many schoolteachers are also roped in by the Election Commission to assist in the running of elections.

By March 22, the fasting month begins (and ends on April 21) and then Hari Raya begins, with a month of celebrations.

The window period available for the PM to call for the GE gets tighter as the clock ticks. The term of the present Federal Government ends on July 15, 2023.

One exasperated Barisan leader said ‘’if the PM is worried about LCS, he has a valid reason, but no one can be sure what other issues will crop up next if the dragging continues”.

The PM is certainly keeping his options close to his chest and politicians, who claimed they have been told of “possible months” heard directly from the PM, have ended up being wrong, so far.

Forces face farce


Under construction: One of the controversial littoral combat ships at the Boustead Naval Shipyard in Lumut.

THE current controversy surrounding the purchase of six littoral combat ships (LCS), which is burning RM11bil of taxpayers’ hard-earned money, isn’t the first discrepancy and alleged corruption, incompetence and mismanagement involving the Defence Ministry (Mindef).

In the name of national interest, details relating to procurement are often shrouded in secrecy, with information branded classified.

Last week, the government announced that it plans to set up a Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate the LCS issue, which has now been presented to the Cabinet.

It’s certainly a good follow-up to the detailed findings by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and the de-classification of a report which highlighted the poor financial management and cash flow issues ailing Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS), the company embroiled in the LCS fiasco.

Hopefully, the setting up of the RCI will expose Mindef’s shortcomings and reveal it to the public while establishing a proper procurement process.

The RCI shouldn’t be another panel with a glorified name which delays its deliberation and has its report collecting dust at the end of it.

The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has already stepped in, and Malaysians want to see the case expedited with the Attorney General hauling up the culprits responsible for the inflated costs.

This could include powerful political personalities who directed those implicated in the PAC report.

The sad reality is that the LCS issue is yet another shameful blot on Mindef’s long and never-ending series of scandals over the last 40 years.

Before we pore over its “chequered” history of the past decades, fresh in my mind is the 2019 news reports of the non-delivery of six helicopters worth RM300mil that were ordered in 2015.

Bernama had reported that a Mindef representative filed a complaint at MACC, saying the McDonnell Douglas MD530G lightweight combat helicopters were to be handed to Malaysia in 2017 and 2018.

It reported, quoting sources, that approval for the November 2015 purchase of the helicopters was not done according to procedures, with the government’s interests not properly protected.

The source told Bernama that the Malaysian government had paid up RM112.65mil for the acquisition, or 35% of the total cost.

We haven’t heard from MACC since 2019, when it said it was investigating 14 controversial land swap deals involving Mindef.

The list of dodgy procurement deals is long. It includes the 1981 purchase of 26 units of the British Alvis Scorpion tanks.

According to Consumer Association of Penang president, Mohideen Abdul Kader, the tank’s recommended Rolls-Royce gasoline engines were replaced with slower diesel ones, and the guns with heavier ones.

He said the modifications made the tanks heavier and slower, a sitting duck in any military encounter, and eventually in 2018, they were scrapped.

“The 186 SIBMAS armoured personnel carriers purchased by Malaysia in 1983 were found to lack combat effectiveness.

“Malaysia bought 18 Russian Sukhoi Su-30MKM Air Superiority Fighters, taking delivery of three in 2007 and the rest in 2009.

He said the deal, worth RM3.2bil, was made through a Russian state company whose local agent was paid 12% of the purchase price, amounting to RM380mil.

Mohideen said by 2018, most of them had become unserviceable, with only four of the 18 fighter jets still able to fly. The rest were under repair and the ministry eventually fired the contractor, apparently for failing to maintain the jets in airworthy condition.

“In 2002, the ministry negotiated through a Kuala Lumpur-based local company Perimekar Sdn Bhd to buy two Scorpene submarines and a used Agosta submarine produced by the French government at the price of RM4.5bil.”

Mohideen said a whopping commission of RM510mil was paid, 11% of the purchase price of the submarines.

He also claimed that in 2004, the PSC-Naval Dockyard was contracted to deliver six patrol boats to the Malaysian Navy, but only two were delivered in 2006, neither of which were fully operational.

He said by 2007, the original cost of RM5.35bil ballooned to RM6.7bil, a 26% increase.

Mohideen said the auditor general reported that the ministry had paid RM4.26bil, although only RM2.87bil worth of work had been completed, implying an overpayment of 48%. He said the Cabinet also waived late penalties of RM214mil.

A comprehensive list can’t be contained within this space because, sadly, it’s never-ending.

To take consolation, similar malpractices are reported all over the world.

Dr Zia Ul Haque Shamsi’s report on July 19, 2021, described India as having the most corruption scandals when it comes to buying arms and equipment.

He said India was plagued with scandals of military transactions despite stringent and painstaking bureaucratic processes for the approvals of defence procurements.

It will only be a matter of time before similar specialist writers on defence use Malaysia as a case study, especially when our approval process can hardly be described as rigorous.

As lawyer Mohideen rightly said, “the incestuous relationship between politically connected local agents of foreign arms manufacturers and the ministry must be ended.”

Enough is enough. It’s time we clean up our act and stop the country being looted through Mindef.

Deals signed without board meetings

PETALING JAYA: The managing director of the company undertaking the RM9bil littoral combat ships (LCS) project had so much power that he could sign all agreements, including letters of award (LOAs) to the main contractors involved in building the six ships.

In fact, 12 LOAs were given by former Boustead Heavy Industries Bhd (BHIB) managing director Tan Sri Ahmad Ramli Nor to two main contractors – Contraves Advanced Devices Sdn Bhd (CAD) and Contraves Electrodyamics Sdn Bhd (CED) totalling RM3.3bil – without the need to call for full board meetings.

The involvement of the two contractors inflated the cost to RM9bil.

“Tan Sri was given sweeping authority to execute and sign all agreements, LOAs with CAD. He was extremely confident that ‘whatever I’m going to do, it is ultimately going to be condoned by my boss’,” said forensic auditor Alliance IFA Sdn Bhd’s Prabhat Kumar.

He revealed that the appointment of CAD as lead contractor to procure components for the LCS was made through a directors’ circular resolution (DCR).

A DCR is normally issued as approval for routine matters and where the board feels that calling all the members is a waste of time. The directors merely need to sign the document.

Prabhat expressed his surprise at how such a major decision was made through a DCR as it was more appropriate to have a full board of directors meeting.

“The reason is that when the board meeting is being conducted, (at) that time every board member has the opportunity to raise a number of questions to clarify doubts and issues,” he added.

He told the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) that in his investigations of over 60 companies that “whenever DCRs, in a very critical situation, are used, it is always used to avoid discussions”. CAD and CED are two companies which are jointly owned by BHIB and German firm Rheinmetall Group.

Ahmad Ramli, an ex-navy chief, was managing director of BHIB and former chairman of Boustead Naval Shipyard Sdn Bhd (BNS), a unit of Boustead Heavy Industries Corporation (BHIC).

His name has been repeatedly mentioned in the 247-page PAC report on the RM9bil scandal.

The LCS was supposed to have been delivered in stages with the last one scheduled for 2023 but until today, not a single ship is ready although RM6bil has been paid to BNS.

“Primary evidence suggested that CAD was used as a vehicle – this is very important – to minimise transparency and to avoid the scrutiny and detection by the procurement team, the steering committee, and the internal audit of BHIC.

“The scrutiny by the three was avoided because BHIC is a public-listed company,” said Prabhat.

He said: “CAD will be the vehicle… (that) by entering into such a contract, that does not allow them to enter and to look into the details and the nitty-gritty of the business, which has been taken by them.”

The involvement of CAD in the LCS project, said Prabhat, had “resulted in a much higher cost than expected and provided an umbrella to hide the actual cost, which was paid to secure various components for this programme”.

Double claims, marked-up prices and no supporting documents

PETALING JAYA: Overlapping letters of award (LOAs), double claims for the same services, marked-up prices and the absence of supporting documents involving the two contractors in the setting up of a Built-in Test (BIT) centre for the littoral combat ships have cost taxpayers over RM898mil.

In its report, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) named the two contractors as Contraves Advanced Devices Sdn Bhd (CAD) and Contraves Electrodynamics Sdn Bhd (CED).

The two companies belong to Boustead Heavy Industries Corporation (BHIC), which has a 51% stake, while German-owned Rheinmetall Group has the other 49%. CAD and CED are the contractors of the uncompleted six littoral combat ships (LCS) project.

Forensic auditor Alliance IFA Sdn Bhd’s Prabhat Kumar said the involvement of the two contractors had resulted in possible damages, such as overlapping LOAs for the BIT centre and double claims for the same services in the LOAs over the combat management system (CMS) amounting to RM898mil.

The BIT centre is set up to conduct trials and test the functionality of all equipment, supposedly for the six LCS, before these are accepted for installation on the ships.

Prabhat told the PAC of discrepancies, such as payments made without supporting documents.

“Payment milestones without deliverables and necessary documents. We did not see any supporting documents.

“Exceptional mark-up, except for the signature of the person. You know, approve, approve, approve.

“Exceptional mark-up as a middleman resulted in the loss of cash. That is why there was a person who was caught,” he was quoted as saying on page 139 of the 247-page report.

He did not name the person caught.

Prabhat also pointed out irregularities relating to the LOAs for the CMS, which were issued to CAD and CED.

The LOA for the CMS, equipment, and engineering and integration was awarded to CED at RM1.185bil on the basis of a quotation from DCNS, a French company.

DCNS is the former name of France’s Naval Group, which had also built the Scorpene submarines for Malaysia.

Prabhat said the quotation from DCNS was dated Dec 23, 2010, but this was issued even before the signing of the LOA with the government.

“This reflects the intent of those involved in this project. They had no intention to deliver the LCS project.

“They only want – intent to maximise their gain which was issued even before the signing of the LOA with the government,” he said, adding the LOA was issued, “sidelining the evaluation process by restricting the involvement of the technical and commercial team.”

He said within six months, a supplemental LOA was issued in favour of CED by former Boustead Heavy Industries Bhd managing director Tan Sri Ahmad Ramli Mohd Nor and ex-navy captain Anuar Murad, the head of the LCS programme at the Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS), for the development of the BIT Centre at RM305mil.

“The scope of this LOA appeared to overlap with the original LOA. No specific approval was obtained from the board for the issuance of the LOA. The cost of investment was not budgeted in the LCS programme.

“The most important thing, payment was being made by them. Ownership lies with CAD and not BHIC,” he added.

The bills kept flowing in


Controversial project: One of the littoral combat ships under construction at the Boustead Naval Shipyard in Lumut.

PETALING JAYA: A huge amount of money meant for the uncompleted RM9bil six littoral combat ships (LCS) project was used to buy spare parts, including even TV sets, a special panel headed by former auditor-general Tan Sri Amrin Buang has revealed.

Fellow panel member Datuk Dr Mohd Tap Salleh also pointed out that the contract was drawn up in such a way that any activity or movement was considered progress and the government just had to pay.

“I think the point to note is that a lot of money was spent on buying spare parts when the ships were not ready,” said Ambrin.

“I think they are in the position to know exactly what they should be paying? When exactly should they make the purchase?

“So, if ada elemen-elemen yang tidak sihat, beli dulu you know, dalam keadaan apa sekali pun dan dapatkan duit itu cepat-cepat. (So, if there are unhealthy elements, buy first, you know, in whatever situation and get the money quickly).

“That is a different story-lah,’’ Ambrin said in his testimony to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC).

Ambrin had headed the Special Committee on Governance Investigation, Government Procurement and Finance’s report on the LCS project.

Dr Mohd Tap said the committee wanted to show to the PAC “that money was simply spent”.“Just to show you or to demonstrate to you, how crazy it was. They just buy because the money is there or the contract was there. So, we must pay. Activity means you buy anything or you move something, you have to pay,” he said.

Dr Mohd Tap described the LCS project as contractor-driven in the sense that the views of the end user – the Navy – was not taken seriously in terms of its needs.

“That is why the change from Sigma (class) to Gowind (class) was done within a few days and the negotiation of the pricing was also done within a few days, which is not possible.

“Unless there are hidden hands involved in this, I think the biggest issue that JKS (the committee) has faced all this while the end user – the military – was never very high on the agenda,” he said.

The Navy had wanted the Sigma design of the LCS by a Dutch firm and the combat management system (CMS) from France but following intense lobbying, Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS), a unit of Boustead Heavy Industries Corporation (BHIC), opted for the Gowind design and SETIS-CMS from France.

Former Royal Malaysian Navy chief admiral Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Jaafar had told PAC that Gowind was not a proven design while Sigma was already operational in Indonesia, Morocco and in a few other countries.

(Dr Mohd Tap, who was the Malaysia Integrity Institute president, died on Nov 30, 2021, at the age of 72. According to PAC members, he was very vocal in the meetings to investigate the LCS issue.)

Hope in our Rulers


Leading the way: Their Majesties the King and Queen have openly wished Christians Merry Christmas annually when the greeting has been questioned by some who claim it should be prohibited. – Istana Negara Facebook page

IT may seem odd that the institution of the Malay Rulers, whose origins can be traced back to the early 15th century, is today the most progressive voice. At the other end of the spectrum are our politicians, who often fumble and stumble, or worse, stay silent when their opinions are most needed.

The senior Sultans have instead, always spoken up and on many occasions, even reminded religious figures that Malaysia is a multi-ethnic country, and that diversity must not just be respected but embraced.

The powerful underlying message is – the Rulers are the heads of Islam in their respective states, which is clearly defined in the Federal Constitution.

The Religious Minister, federal religious agencies, local government and politicians, who also double up as theologians, are not the leaders of the religious order.

As the country ushers in its national day on Aug 31, it can’t be denied that many Malaysians are concerned, if not disturbed, by the direction our beloved country is taking.

The bickering politicians in the divided coalition have not imbued confidence with a leadership that is seemingly uninspiring and incapable of providing hope.

Leading up to the 65th National Day, the current political mood has dampened spirits in this country.

Race, religion and corruption have continued to dog and drag this country down, even though our founding fathers, Tunku Abdul Rahman, in particular, built it on a foundation of unity and hope.

He led a delegation of leaders reflecting Malaya’s multi-ethnicity to London for talks, and his first Cabinet was also clearly diverse.

Tunku incessantly said it, including in his popular column, “As I See It,” in The Star in the 1980s, that Malaysia is a secular country.

But fast forward to 2022, when certain religious groups and individuals have continued to push their hard-line religious agenda, yet nearly no political figures, be it in government or opposition, have voiced their positions or concerns.

Many Malay politicians, in fact, choose to compete among themselves by showing off their religious credentials or looking the other way and remaining silent in the face of far-reaching religious assertiveness. They even cast a blind eye when secular structures – which are part of a pillar of the 1957 Federal Constitution – are challenged.

After all, there’s an impending general election, so why risk incurring the wrath of the biggest bank of the electorate, the predominantly Malay-Muslims.

The Group of 25, comprising prominent moderate Malays, seems to be the only entity prepared to voice its stand on the changing religious climate and the need to uphold the Federal Constitution and Rukunegara.

To put it bluntly, a system that seems feudal and dating back to the Melaka Sultanate has proven to be reliable, adaptive, and engaging, even in modern day Malaysia.

Leading the way have been Their Majesties the King and Queen, who have openly wished Christians Merry Christmas annually when the greeting has been questioned by some who claim it’s an expression with Christian connotations and should be prohibited.

As for the individual states, three Sultans in particular, the Sultans of Selangor, Johor and Perak – have consistently voiced their sense of moderation by reassuring Malaysians, especially non-Muslims, that their interests are protected. While they are Malay Rulers, they are also the Rulers for all Malaysians.

The Sultan of Perak, Sultan Nazrin Muizzuddin Shah, is surely the champion of diversity with a strong commitment to differing views and opinions. His Royal Highness has also shared his concerns many times on the ills of corruption. His speeches are well-researched, and his articulate delivery is top notch.

Meanwhile, Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah, has taken to task politicians who use Islam to stop cultural events like Bon Odori, and he has also banned politicians from preaching in mosques in Selangor.

His logical decree, which became effective Jan 1, was aimed at preventing Islam from being politicised and misused by politicians in mosques and suraus, potentially leading to slander, friction, and division among Muslims.

In the case of the Sultan of Johor, His Majesty is someone who doesn’t mince his words.

In 2017, he condemned a launderette in Johor for adopting a Muslim-only policy, saying Johor “is not a Taliban state” and that the state “belongs to all races and faiths.”

Sultan Ibrahim Ibni Sultan Iskandar, in statements in 2015 and 2017, even went further by saying the state had cut off ties with the powerful federal government’s Jakim (Department of Islamic Development Malaysia) and questioned why it needed RM1bil for its annual budget.

His Majesty has also made his clarion Bangsa Johor call a popular one, which has resonated well with Johoreans.

Certainly, the rationality of these Rulers has provided a ray of hope to Malaysians who believe that moderation is still possible, and that none of us should cede territory to extremists from any religion or race.

Politicians come and go. Their interests are short-term, which is usually to win in an election, but our Rulers are here to stay, regardless of which political party or coalition is in charge.

It’s incredulous that Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is still talking about a so-called “new concept,” and a “new movement” called Gerakan Tanah Air, which is based on Malay and Islamic agendas.

When one hears of such a political narrative, it clearly indicates there has been no flourishment of new political ideas.

At least our founding fathers were far-sighted. Interestingly, when one reads the Federal Constitution, it consistently uses the term “The Rulers” and never “the Malay Rulers.”

Happy National Day and Daulat Tuanku.