THERE can’t possibly be a valid reason for war in any shape or form. Call it aggression, invasion, occupation, liberation or special military operations. Any which way you slice it, it’s still war, and the lives of innocent people are ultimately destroyed overnight.

So, there can be no justification for Russia invading Ukraine.

All the nations – or rather their leaders – that have been embroiled in wars always have the same narrative.

They all did it (hypocritically) in the name of protecting national interests, but in truth, it has always been about competition over territory and resources, historical rivalries and grievances, or unfortunately, defending against an aggressor.

Those clued in to history will know that these are chronicles of the victors in wars. The winners are always the good guys in our textbooks.

So, when the colonists landed on our shores to plunder our natural resources, they used the word “discovered” as if there were no people or rulers before they came to loot.

The Orientalists, European writers, and designers in the history of the Eastern world, justified their actions supposedly because there were no established administrative and judicial systems before they arrived.

These historians have even used the maxim “Gold, God and Glory” to justify their exploitations, conquests and expansions by Europeans, especially the British, Spanish, French, Dutch and Portuguese.

At the turn of the 20th century, imperialism took a different form via economic control through a mode of global governance and institutions, which exerted dominance over most developing countries around the world.

Hypocrisy by the superpowers isn’t something new. Ukraine is not Russia’s first conquest as it invaded Afghanistan from 1979 until 1989, which was 10 long years.

The war led to massive destruction and untold misery for the beautiful country and its people.

The war took the lives of 15,000 Soviet soldiers and injured 35,000, while two million Afghan civilians were killed.

To fight the Russians, the United States provided arms to resistance fighters, the Mujahedeen, who ironically, evolved into Taliban terrorists and turned their guns on the US instead after the Russians left.

And there was the invasion of Iraq and Libya in 2003 by the US and UK led coalition, which was supposedly “to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein’s support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people.”

Let’s serve this straight up – it was simply an invasion to get rid of two leaders who didn’t align themselves with the West. And to possibly steal the country’s oil.

We all know there were no weapons of mass destruction, evidenced by the findings of a UN inspection later. However, there was mass destruction indeed, but of the two countries and its people.

And worse, terrorists in the form of the Islamic State took over these places and plunged the nations from dictatorship to hell holes as they came under Isis rule.

Even stranger still, the US occupied Afghanistan for 20 years shortly after Al-Qaeda’s attacks on Sept 11, 2001.

It was a war against terrorism, but the invasion took more than 170,000 lives and ultimately failed to defeat the Taliban.

Likewise, the US invaded Vietnam in 1965 and by the time it finally withdrew in 1973, more than 58,000 Americans had lost their lives senselessly. Yet today, some consider Vietnam to be a potential ally of the US, especially in the geopolitical context of territorial disputes of the South China Sea and the containment of China.

Again, as the interests of powerful nations gain priority and their leaders compete, countries like Syria and Yemen continue to suffer. But how many of us are concerned by their predicament?

Maybe these nations are considered unimportant to the West.

There have been many major wars since World War II (1939 to 1945), which seem to have been unceremoniously ignored by some international media covering the Ukraine invasion.

In fact, the Bosnian War from 1992 to 1995 saw the ethnic cleansing of Bosnian Muslims by Serbs.

The comments of some Western TV reporters reek of racism, especially when they express concern that these Ukrainian refugees “look like any European family” and “they seem so like us.”

They’ve conveniently forgotten that Bosnians are also Europeans and look like white folks, except they’re Muslims.

It’s the same with the plight of the Palestinians, who have suffered systematic and methodical genocide since the 1940s, with almost incessant attacks on them by Israelis.

Western nations have all looked the other way as bombs continue to rain down on innocent Palestinians.

It’s not just the Western powers but Arab leaders preaching Islamic brotherhood, who don’t even want to lift a finger to help them.

The Arab world, by and large, only issues condemnations every time there is an attack, but it remains just words, and not actions – at least so far.

In fact, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan, Morocco, Egypt and Jordan have diplomatic ties with Israel.

Let’s not forget that Israel invaded Lebanon twice – in 1978 and 1982, and again bombarded Lebanon in 2006.

What has happened in Ukraine is the result of a geopolitical fight beyond the comprehension, care and understanding of the common people in Ukraine and Russia.

The people in Ukraine speak Russian and many have relatives and friends in Russia. After all, it was under the Soviet Union previously.

I’ve had the privilege of visiting Ukraine, including cities like Kyiv, Odessa and Crimea, and I have fond memories of this incredible country.

I have Ukrainian friends in Malaysia who have shared their fears for the safety of their families stuck in the country or have refused to be refugees because they would rather die in their own homes.

The leadership and people of Ukraine have chosen to be with the West, and it must have stoked Vladimir Putin’s fears that it will join Nato and have its military powers parked next to Russia.

Regardless of the logic and nonsense of it, the inflated egos of powerful political figures, coupled with their insecurities, have caused misery to common civilians.

Any form of aggression, by any country, is unacceptable. So, we need to find a place in our hearts and pray for the people of Ukraine – without forgetting other people in similar situations.

It has been reported that there are at least three dozen countries that are now at war or in conflict.

All these refugees don’t deserve to be in these positions because of stupid leaders.

As for Ukraine, it was Putin who started the war, so he must end it. This meaningless war should never have happened in the first place.

Billion dollar bombshells: Leissner testifying in a US court as a key witness in the 1MDB corruption trial of his former Goldman Sachs colleague, as shown in this court sketch. – Reuters

IT must have been a week when most Malaysians cringed in embarrassment. Tough times, indeed, for trying to find a place to bury our heads knowing that the world was reading about the level of corruption that has plagued our country.

It’s not just the politicians either, but top-level officials and bureaucrats, and even their spouses and mistresses, who seem to be inextricably involved in one way or another.

Yes, it’s just a claim by Tim Leissner, a man with questionable intentions, who took money from 1MDB, but he has now turned prosecution witness.

Based on records, he has poor credentials, but we must admit his testimony is damning.

Leissner, a former Goldman Sachs banker, has been described as a “serial liar” and “cheater”, and these are the more polite terms used on him.

After all, billions have been siphoned off by Jho Low and his partners in crime, whether at corporate or political levels.

While Leissner has testified in court that he was allegedly blackmailed by his lover into buying a RM43mil (US$10mil) house in the posh Knightsbridge area in London, one wonders what the relevance was in naming his affairs with the other women, who have no role in the 1MDB scandal.

While these women were politically connected because of their families, it hints at how desperate Leissner is to boast about his conquests with “the natives”, so to speak. While the mainstream media didn’t name them, social media did, and unfortunately, their identities and pictures went viral.

It has been reported that former Astro chief executive officer Datuk Rohana Rozhan has been called up by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency (MACC) because if 1MDB money was used to buy her a house, it will involve possible money laundering as well as failure to report the hideous crime.

The alleged relationship between Rohana and Leissner first surfaced in the book, Billion Dollar Whale by Tom Wright and Bradley Hope, albeit indirectly. She was mentioned as the former chief financial officer of Astro, but in Leissner’s words, their liaison was an open secret.

The writers described Leissner as “a good talker,” who grew up in the northern German town of Wolfsburg, close to Hanover, who talked his way into the upper echelons of Malaysia’s elite.

But while the pillow talk and seduction make for juicy reading, it’s the missing money and the links that should remain our focus. These are the missing pieces in the jigsaw puzzle.

Those implicated will or have to come out with denials. It’s unlikely they’ll want to refute him in open court. The reality is that their credibility is in shambles, even if unfair.

Malaysians are likely not going to subscribe to their denials and would want the authorities, including the MACC, to take it up.

The truth is, our institutions including Bank Negara Malaysia and well, the MACC itself, have lost their credibility. More than just simple denials are needed to restore their image.

That amounts to a serious revamp if it means allowing these agencies to move forward. Perception is everything and surely, we don’t have to tell the government that.

We mustn’t send the wrong message that there are different sets of rules for the rich and powerful, what with their connections. If they have committed a crime, they should not get away with it.

Incredibly, we now see corrupt and even convicted politicians being feted like celebrities or honourable personalities, and their leadership unfathomably “missed.”

Well, unfortunately, that’s also because their successors are worse in terms of expectations and performances, and the lack of leadership has led to some segments of Malaysia longing for a time when there was hope, stability and purpose. Yes, it’s an irony when some of us pine for the leadership of crooks, but we have come to that stage.

I’m afraid that some of us Malaysians are also sending that kind of signal to these tarnished politicians.

Malaysia is indeed in a sorry state as we struggle to solve that conundrum. It looks like more dirt will surface to complete the inside story of one of the biggest financial heists in history.

Long wait: Loh with her children during an outing few years ago. Last week, she finally got to see her children for the second time in three years. – Photo provided

IT’S a tragedy, really. Common sense, compassion, legality and fair play all seem to be absent in the recent alleged conversion of three children to Islam.

The children – a pair of twin girls aged 14 and their brother aged 10 – are minors. Their father, who is in jail for a drug offence, had purportedly taken them to an Islamic religious office and had them converted.

Apparently, the children agreed to the conversion even though they are minors.

Their father had told officials that he wasn’t aware of their mother’s whereabouts, and amazingly, they were immediately converted.

The children were then placed in a welfare home because their father was about to begin a jail term for drug abuse.

To be fair to the officials, here was a father who needed his children to be cared for and he didn’t know where their mother was.

They did what they felt was right – ensure the three had food and a roof over their heads at a children’s home. This could just be an instinctive reaction of plain compassion and attending to an urgent need.

But the mother, Loh Siew Hong, has now showed up and has told the media alleging that she has been prevented from seeing her children. And in a likely act of desperation, she has conceded to converting to Islam if that’s the only way for her to reunite with her kids.

Here’s where the confusion and suspicion begin. The father claimed he had no idea where his ex-wife was, and this was taken at face value. It would have helped if some form of investigation was done to trace the mother.

It appears the welfare department was unaware the court had granted custody of the kids to the mum.

The religious council now arguably looks like it was in a rush to convert the minors.

But to be clearer, it is the religious office – and not the National Registration Department – that registered them as Muslims. So, there are no legal implications yet.

It has been reported that after converting to Islam, their father handed his children over to an Islamic study centre and then went to prison.

Let’s put it this way – the 35-year-old mother was not consulted and the impression we’re getting now is that she was denied all rights to her own children.

The Islamic centre, which is taking care of the children, seems to have more authority than the mother. Loh has now, supposedly, ended up having to seek permission from Rumah Sinar Harapan children’s home in Jitra, Kedah, to see her children.

With them being minors, it seems unusual for the mother to accept the claim that the kids had agreed to convert without her knowing the circumstances – emotional or otherwise – to their decisions.

Last week, after days of painstakingly waiting, Loh finally got to see her children for the second time in three years.

According to her, she was denied meeting her children for days, apparently over Covid-19 fears.

She had, in fact, won custody of her children in the High Court last year, and saw them for the first time in three years outside the Kangar district police headquarters.

Perlis has a state Constitution allowing either the father or mother to convert the child. The question is: do the state laws override the court decision?

Any form of natural justice would have clearly adhered to the overwhelming circumstances that Loh should be taking care of her children as the biological mother.

She earns a steady income as a chef in Genting Highlands. Her ex-husband, Nagashwaran Muniandy, is serving a jail term, and that says enough of him.

Instead, the High Court’s decision has been over-ridden by Nagashwaran’s simple act of unilaterally converting the children into Muslims.

This echoes the case of M. Indira Gandhi, who has not seen her daughter Prasana Diksa for 11 years. She has no idea where her 12-year-old daughter is.

Nothing has changed despite the Federal Court ordering the police in 2018 to find and return Prasana, who was taken by her ex-husband just before he converted to Islam in 2009. The High Court had also issued an arrest warrant in 2014 for the Muslim convert, who now goes by the name Muhammad Riduan Abdullah.

The High Court ruling in 2010 had granted full custody of all three children from their marriage to Indira.

Islam is a compassionate religion. There’s no coercion or obligation in Islam, but only ignorant people who manipulate it in the name of the religion.

Likewise, most of us non-Muslims would also object if our children embraced Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism or other faiths, without knowledge or consent if they’re still minors. When they become adults, it’s their right to embrace any religion they choose.

Faith is between a person and God. It must be respected and not used as a tool to win custody of a child, especially after the law has decided otherwise.

It’s a travesty when there are parties who support such an act. Let’s not allow religion to cloud common sense and fair justice.

It’s more important for Islamic officials to ask this question – are these opportunistic husbands using Islam to gain custody of their children because of their marital squabbles and ignoring court decisions?

Likewise, politicians shouldn’t come into the picture to score political points, especially since that won’t help the mother or children.