Author Archives: wcw

Where every minute counts

THE ruling that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency (MACC) cannot interview witnesses beyond office hours has put the agency in a fix.

There is now a suggestion that the same judicial principle is also applicable to the police.

Lawyer-politician Karpal Singh has argued that the recent High Court landmark ruling on the MACC was also applicable to the police, but the Inspector-General of Police has shot back to say it did not apply to them.

The country’s top cop also sarcastically said all police reports should be referred to Karpal Singh after 5pm. He stressed that it would be pointless to operate police stations round the clock if police could not record statements from witnesses after office hours.

Karpal Singh has also said all witnesses who were questioned after office hours in the last three years could claim damages against the government and police.

Under the Public Authority Protection Act, a suit against the government or government body could commence within three years, he said.

The MACC and police are both law enforcement agencies and do not operate like other government departments. Theirs, and especially the police, is a 24-hour job because criminals do not operate only during office hours.

It would be naive of anyone to think so, and when it comes to dealing with criminals, one does not treat them with kid gloves. Timing is crucial when dealing with criminal cases and, many times, it can be a matter of life and death.

Take, for example, life-threatening abduction or kidnapping cases. How would the police react if these cases take place after office hours when they cannot question any witnesses? Must they wait until the next morning before they react, which could mean the victim could already be dead?

When a criminal or a witness is allowed time, they are also able to tamper with crucial evidence which could otherwise have determined their conviction.

What happens if a murder or robbery takes place after 5pm and the cops can only take a report but are unable to record a statement?

What if the witnesses, especially the traumatised ones, cannot remember important details the next morning?

In some instances, the witness may have to fly off the next day, as in cases involving foreigners, or they may be threatened by those involved. That allowance of time could enable the criminals to meet these witnesses. In short, investigations would be impeded, suspects have the chance to abscond, and evidence could be tampered with or even destroyed.

The High Court had ruled that the MACC can no longer hold witnesses for questioning overnight.

Justice Mohamad Ariff Md Yusof said that Section 30(3)(a) of the MACC Act does not empower it to conduct investigations on a witness “around-the-clock” and agreed that Kajang Municipal Councillor Tan Boon Wah, 39, who filed for a judicial review, had been “unlawfully detained” by the MACC.

Tan had sued the MACC, its chief commissioner Datuk Seri Ahmad Said Hamdan and assistant superintendent Mohammad Hassan Zulkifli for questioning him for 16 hours overnight which, he said, caused him to suffer damages and losses.

Public sentiment is also against the MACC as an overnight questioning had ended with the mysterious death of political aide Teoh Beng Hock.

Public opinion is also not on the side of the MACC and the police. That is a fact the two agencies would need to rectify.

The MACC has said it would accept the court ruling but their work could be affected from now onwards.

MACC officers have privately commented that the office hours ruling would make their families happier. They are not compensated for doing their questioning in the wee hours, but are instead criticised. They do not get support from politicians and the public alike for doing their work. In short, morale is down.

The police have said the court ruling is not applicable to them but Karpal Singh has insisted that it does. So, no one is clear at this point.

If it is extended to the police, Immigration and Customs, it would mean that no work would be done after 5.30pm and during weekends.

The job of the enforcement agencies has now become harder but the work of the criminals has become easier.

No doubt witnesses must be protected and their human rights upheld but we should not forget to consider the wide-ranging consequences of the ruling in fighting crime.

It would probably be politically popular, as the overnight questioning of Teoh had led to tragic consequences and even now no one is sure how and why he died.

But the fact is the MACC has been blamed because of the suspicious circumstances surrounding Teoh’s death and the black blot would be permanently on its record. It has put the MACC and other enforcement agencies in a difficult spot as there is now a lack of trust towards their operating methods.

An appeal is expected to be filed by the Attorney-General against the High Court decision. It is now up to the A-G to argue that the decision would restrict the work of the MACC and other agencies in fighting crime.

We can’t put the MACC and the police in such a situation when Scotland Yard, Hong Kong’s Independent Commission against Corruption and Interpol are sticking to the practice of questioning witnesses after office hours.

Where every minute counts

THE ruling that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency (MACC) cannot interview witnesses beyond office hours has put the agency in a fix.

There is now a suggestion that the same judicial principle is also applicable to the police.

Lawyer-politician Karpal Singh has argued that the recent High Court landmark ruling on the MACC was also applicable to the police, but the Inspector-General of Police has shot back to say it did not apply to them.

The country’s top cop also sarcastically said all police reports should be referred to Karpal Singh after 5pm. He stressed that it would be pointless to operate police stations round the clock if police could not record statements from witnesses after office hours.

Karpal Singh has also said all witnesses who were questioned after office hours in the last three years could claim damages against the government and police.

Under the Public Authority Protection Act, a suit against the government or government body could commence within three years, he said.

The MACC and police are both law enforcement agencies and do not operate like other government departments. Theirs, and especially the police, is a 24-hour job because criminals do not operate only during office hours.

It would be naive of anyone to think so, and when it comes to dealing with criminals, one does not treat them with kid gloves. Timing is crucial when dealing with criminal cases and, many times, it can be a matter of life and death.

Take, for example, life-threatening abduction or kidnapping cases. How would the police react if these cases take place after office hours when they cannot question any witnesses? Must they wait until the next morning before they react, which could mean the victim could already be dead?

When a criminal or a witness is allowed time, they are also able to tamper with crucial evidence which could otherwise have determined their conviction.

What happens if a murder or robbery takes place after 5pm and the cops can only take a report but are unable to record a statement?

What if the witnesses, especially the traumatised ones, cannot remember important details the next morning?

In some instances, the witness may have to fly off the next day, as in cases involving foreigners, or they may be threatened by those involved. That allowance of time could enable the criminals to meet these witnesses. In short, investigations would be impeded, suspects have the chance to abscond, and evidence could be tampered with or even destroyed.

The High Court had ruled that the MACC can no longer hold witnesses for questioning overnight.

Justice Mohamad Ariff Md Yusof said that Section 30(3)(a) of the MACC Act does not empower it to conduct investigations on a witness “around-the-clock” and agreed that Kajang Municipal Councillor Tan Boon Wah, 39, who filed for a judicial review, had been “unlawfully detained” by the MACC.

Tan had sued the MACC, its chief commissioner Datuk Seri Ahmad Said Hamdan and assistant superintendent Mohammad Hassan Zulkifli for questioning him for 16 hours overnight which, he said, caused him to suffer damages and losses.

Public sentiment is also against the MACC as an overnight questioning had ended with the mysterious death of political aide Teoh Beng Hock.

Public opinion is also not on the side of the MACC and the police. That is a fact the two agencies would need to rectify.

The MACC has said it would accept the court ruling but their work could be affected from now onwards.

MACC officers have privately commented that the office hours ruling would make their families happier. They are not compensated for doing their questioning in the wee hours, but are instead criticised. They do not get support from politicians and the public alike for doing their work. In short, morale is down.

The police have said the court ruling is not applicable to them but Karpal Singh has insisted that it does. So, no one is clear at this point.

If it is extended to the police, Immigration and Customs, it would mean that no work would be done after 5.30pm and during weekends.

The job of the enforcement agencies has now become harder but the work of the criminals has become easier.

No doubt witnesses must be protected and their human rights upheld but we should not forget to consider the wide-ranging consequences of the ruling in fighting crime.

It would probably be politically popular, as the overnight questioning of Teoh had led to tragic consequences and even now no one is sure how and why he died.

But the fact is the MACC has been blamed because of the suspicious circumstances surrounding Teoh’s death and the black blot would be permanently on its record. It has put the MACC and other enforcement agencies in a difficult spot as there is now a lack of trust towards their operating methods.

An appeal is expected to be filed by the Attorney-General against the High Court decision. It is now up to the A-G to argue that the decision would restrict the work of the MACC and other agencies in fighting crime.

We can’t put the MACC and the police in such a situation when Scotland Yard, Hong Kong’s Independent Commission against Corruption and Interpol are sticking to the practice of questioning witnesses after office hours.

Be careful what we wish for

IT’S incredulous. PAS Members of Parliament and State Assemblymen have been compelled to take an oath to divorce their wives if they quit or jump to another party.

The news, which has been a hot topic in the political and media circle, has kicked off a controversy.

Even Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad, who is regarded as a moderate in the conservative party, does not see why anyone would want to question what PAS is doing.

It is perfectly acceptable to him. He has been quoted as saying that the oath is not against Islamic teachings as Prophet Muhammad and his companions also did the same thing and were willing to sacrifice their families and belongings.

But others, including religious scholars, have shot down the argument, saying the Prophet’s companions did not do that because of politics.

Perak Mufti Datuk Seri Hussani Zakaria explained the oath was made by the companions to show their loyalty and to defend the Prophet.

“If we want to take an oath for the sake of the party, then divorcing wives should not come into the picture,” he said.

Problematic mix

Even the Malaysian Muslim Lawyers Asso­ciation has questioned the mind-blowing decision of PAS.

But this is what happens when politics is mixed with religion; for that matter, problems too arise when politics and business are not separated.

There was a time when PAS labelled Umno as infidel because of the latter’s partnership with the MCA and the MIC.

PAS leaders and followers, especially in Kelantan and Terengganu, refused to pray in the same mosque as Umno members. Even marriages with Umno members were shunned.

But now, PAS is openly working with the DAP, PKR and even Parti Sosialis Malaysia. So, politics is essentially expedient in nature, not about religion, as PAS leaders would want its members to believe.

The reality is that PAS leaders, behind the flowing robes, turbans and beards, are just politicians who can cut deals for power and position.

Being able to walk the corridors of power in Putrajaya is a tempting goal, whether it is via cooperating with Umno or PKR.

It has showed that its leaders are quite prepared to work with Umno for purported Muslim unity after telling its non-Muslim listeners that Umno is a communal party.

But PAS is also consistent on certain issues. As much as it wants to win over non-Muslim votes, exploiting their resentment against Umno, it has been unable to fully convince the non-Muslims of their readiness to shed their orthodox slant.

The liberal lifestyle enjoyed by Malaysians is at stake if progressive and liberal forces continue to lose their battle.

Gaming and drinking liquor may be frowned upon by all religions but democracy is also about the right to make choices. We have the right to decide for ourselves whether we want to drink or not. If the sale of beer is restricted, as pursued by PAS, would it be followed with wine as the next step?

Wine is used in many churches as part of the Eucharist, a commemoration of Jesus’ Last Supper with his disciples before his arrest and crucifixion.

PAS has put it plainly that it wants to set up a Saudi Arabian-style Islamic state, including chipping away the secular aspect of the Federal Constitution. If non-Muslim supporters continue to strengthen PAS, they are doing so with their eyes open.

The people of Iran overthrew the corrupt Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi monarchy in 1979 because they were against the excesses of his regime. They replaced him with Ayatollah Ruhallah Khomeini, whose return from exile was greeted by millions of Iranians.

Today, the idealistic young set of Iran has found that you have to be careful with what you wish for. Human rights continue to be violated and polls rigged with theologians holding on to power in the name of religion.

Closed debate

In Malaysia, non-Muslims who question PAS leaders have been told to shut up because they are not qualified to debate due to their lack of knowledge on Islam or simply because they are not Muslims.

Activists like Sisters in Islam can tell you the kind of harassment they have to face simply because their liberal views do not match the views of those who push the conservative line.

We are still struggling to open up the demo­cratic space, and discourse often degenerates to name calling and threats, especially in the blogosphere, often by those hiding behind anonymity.

When civil issues become entangled with religious concerns, the debate becomes even more emotional and often the louder ones drown out their opponents.

Even former Perlis Mufti Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin, despite his Islamic credentials, has found out how vicious those who evoke rules and regulations in the name of religion can be.

But those who use God’s name should beware that they too can suffer a similar fate because they are mere mortals like everyone else.

Squabbles within and without

Last week, PKR information chief Latheefa Koya wrote an angry letter to Malaysiakini advising the online news portal to avoid “being manipulated”.

She also took offence with Malaysiakini on its reports quoting unnamed sources “that have been exaggerated or told half-truths or simply lies of party affairs”.

The reports included “Sabah chief throws tantrums at PKR meet” and the purported resignation of PKR secretary-general Salehuddin Hashim, she wrote in her Oct 28 letter.

But a day earlier, Sabah PKR leader Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan had quit as a national vice-president. His resignation from the party now seems inevitable.

On Thursday, Port Klang Assemblyman Badrul Hisham resigned from PKR. Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim had to hurriedly issue a statement urging Badrul to resign and branding him a non-performer – about three hours before Badrul’s press conference.

In the case of Salehuddin, he has texted reporters with a simple denial of reports of his growing frustrations. Most times, he refuses to answer telephone calls.

But some PKR leaders including MPs have privately told the media that they would probably lose Salehuddin, saying he is “on hold” only because of an appeal from party adviser Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

On Thursday, PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail finally admitted that the party was facing a problem.

“The frustrations which have been expressed by some colleagues within the party and by some supporters are valid,” she said.

There is no smoke without fire.

Politicians and journalists have a love-hate relationship but they cannot live without each other. On their part, journalists are used to being accused by politicians of “having an agenda”. On the other hand, most politicians have an agenda, and so they perceive that journalists live and think like them.

Journalists often tell each other that when they are being bashed by both sides of the political divide – meaning the Government and opposition – they are doing all right.

Supporters, too, often get carried away, expecting the media to be anti-government before they are regarded as credible and objective.

Thus, when Malaysiakini, often perceived as unfriendly to the Barisan Nasional, reported on the feuding in PKR, the party found it hard to accept.

Against the backdrop of this resentment in PKR, former friends of Anwar, like Datuk K.S. Nallakaruppan and Ezam Mohd Nor, are making serious insinuations against Anwar and his protégé Azmin Ali, a vice-president.

They have left Malaysians wondering what they are talking about as there has been no response from those they implicated. Being more specific, unfortunately, could get them sued.

Depending on which side you are on, Nalla and Ezam are either traitors or opportunists – or simply former allies who know too much about the main PKR players. But the fact is that both went to jail for Anwar.

Ezam was jailed under the Official Secrets Act and the Internal Security Act while Nala, Anwar’s close friend for 30 years, was sentenced to prison for unlawful possession of live ammunition.

Another PKR ally, PAS, has found itself squabbling over the direction of the Islamist party. The cause of the rift is almost unthinkable, proving the point that there is no permanent enemy or friend in politics, only common interest.

Party spiritual adviser Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat wants PAS to get rid of “problematic leaders” – meaning those, including president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang, who have been accused of wanting to cooperate with Umno.

Nik Aziz, the Kelantan Mentri Besar, has gone on to say that he is prepared to fight those who pursue this aim even if it means wrecking the party.

As a result, some of those implicated by Nik Aziz have come out to say the Umno-PAS deal is over and that they are pro-Pakatan.

The history behind the Umno-PAS unity plan, as most political analysts would be aware of by now, is the uneasy feeling among PAS leaders towards Anwar, who had started to see himself as the next prime minister after the general election.

The much published attempt to grab power by the so-called Sept 16 deadline, via massive defections of Barisan MPs, failed to materialise. A Shadow Cabinet was subsequently planned and announced but until now, the list has not been revealed.

More than a year later, PKR has found itself on the defensive with PAS flexing its muscles to push for and implement its agenda of eventually setting up an Islamic state.

Non-Muslim supporters who voted for PAS then simply because of resentment towards Umno are now coming to realise what their actions in backing PAS could bring.

In Selangor, state PAS chief Datuk Dr Hassan Ali wants the sale of beer to be restricted in certain areas and its youth wing is continuously fussing over concerts involving Western artistes.

One reason megastar Beyonce postponed her Oct 25 concert here was the protest by PAS.

PKR MP Zulkifli Nordin, who sees himself as a defender of Islam, has attempted to push for a Private Member’s Bill in Parliament that would chip away secular laws and replace them with Islamic laws. He, too, pushed to restrict the sale of beer and for action to be taken against Sisters in Islam. He remains untouchable in PKR.

Time to decide

THE countdown has begun. On Saturday, the MCA delegates will decide once and for all who they want to lead the party.

The reality is that party president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat and his suspended deputy president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek have been an odd couple.

They never intended to be a team but during the Oct 18, 2008, party polls, the delegates ended up putting the two together.

In that contest, Ong polled 1,429 votes against Datuk Chua Jui Meng’s 918 for the presidency race.

At the deputy’s race, Dr Chua garnered 1,115 against Ong Ka Chuan (1,001), Donald Lim (209) and Lee Hack Teik (10).

It has been almost a year since the party elections and a year that has been wasted.

The MCA extraordinary general meeting (EGM), for all intents and purposes, is an election between Tee Keat and Soi Lek.

Supporters of both sides have been meeting delegates as if there is a full-scale polls going on. Dinners have been hosted and non-stop telephone calls and SMSes have been made to the voters.

With just six days to go, both Tee Keat and Soi Lek have taken a very low-key approach, preferring not to issue statements but taking a more personal touch instead.

But the feverish coverage of the EGM has stepped up in the Chinese media with front page treatments; as for radio and television talk shows, the dominant issue remains the MCA leadership.

Love-hate relationship

Even as some dismissed the relevance of the MCA in the country’s new political landscape, the amount of attention on, if not the concern of the community for, the party reflects the importance of the Barisan Nasional’s second largest partner.

There’s always a love-hate relationship between the Chinese community and the MCA. Many love to take jibes at the party but they also understand that the MCA is the party that they go to for help.

Some may outwardly condemn the MCA “for not doing anything”, yet these critics would also admit that the community has benefited from the educational programmes of the MCA’s Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman and Kolej Tunku Abdul Rahman.

For the working class, they turn to the MCA Public Services and Complaints Department chief Datuk Michael Chong for assistance. It is no exaggeration to say that his office resembles a government hospital with people waiting for their turn to seek his help.

But the community also wants reforms in the party. They do not want to see a subser­vient MCA. They do not want to see a party of yes-men and conformists – they want to see their leaders stand up and speak up.

They like the push against corruption and Tee Keat’s relentless initiatives in unveiling the wrongdoings of the Port Klang Free Zone project have earned him much admiration.

The task force initiated by him has uncovered disputed claims amounting to RM1.6bil. The community wants to see leaders who dare to take on the seemingly untouchable with their political-business clout.

However, Tee Keat’s detractors have said he is taking on too many battles and offending too many powerful figures, which will cost him politically.

Tee Keat’s youthfulness is his plus point and at TV talk shows, this has been constantly brought up.

A new MCA culture with reforms, including a direct presidential election, has been the focus of Tee Keat’s message. The fact is that the MCA has to change and as with everything in transition, it is often a painful process.

If the MCA is unable to move on, leaving its old baggage behind, then there is little chance of regaining the support of Malaysians.

The sex DVD issue has continued to dog Soi Lek, with his backers saying this was a personal matter and that he had paid the price by quitting all party and government posts and he got himself re-elected.

In many ways, that would be the crux of the EGM – to decide on the kind of leadership and the course of the party. It’s not just what the delegates want but what the community wants.

The 2,377 delegates cannot detach themselves from the sentiments of the community. They have to accommodate their wishes.

High stakes

As the lobbying enters its final lap, supporters of Tee Keat and Soi Lek have both predicted victories.

Chinese papers, however, have apparently reported that gambling syndicates have bet that Tee Keat would win.

Supporters of Tee Keat, however, have frowned on the betting, saying this was not something to be taken lightly. The idea of being a favourite, they said, would help sympathisers vote for Soi Lek.

In the psychological warfare, Soi Lek said there were “silent supporters” who would surprise Tee Keat when they voted.

Then, there is talk of a “third force” which does not want both Tee Keat and Soi Lek but Tee Keat’s camp has dismissed it as a tactic to “divide the supporters of Tee Keat”.

In the Chinese media, where the real battle is being waged, full page newspaper advertisements have been placed by Tee Keat’s supporters to openly back him.

The stakes are high – Tee Keat has openly declared that he would quit, along with the central committee members, if the EGM approves resolution No. 2 to annul the decision of the central committee (CC).

If that happens, Tee Keat said, it would be deemed as casting a vote of no confidence against the CC and him.

That means he would quit – even if the delegates reject Soi Lek’s resolution No. 1 to pass a vote of no confidence against him.

In short, the delegates cannot have the best of both worlds. They have to choose whether they want Tee Keat or Soi Lek.

There’s a Chinese saying yi shan bu neng cang er hu or two tigers cannot live on one mountain. In the case of the MCA, there can only be one party boss and the delegates will have to decide once and for all.

Shaming them is the price to pay

ON THE BEAT
By WONG CHUN WAI

IT’S outrageous. This has to be a scandal as we have plenty of reasons to be angry when there are over 26,000 people who owe the country a whopping RM400mil.

Or have we become so numb that the loss of hundreds of millions no longer shock us or make us scream?

In comparison to the RM1.5bil Port Klang Free Zone fiasco, this is naturally kacang putih money.

But we smell a rat here because the National Higher Education Fund Corporation’s (PTPTN) loan defaulters include public figures.

These are the Yang Berhormat and Yang Berbahagia who are also shameless and irresponsible Yang Berhutang.

The Star reported last week that professionals and celebrities are among the thousands of loan defaulters.

The corporation’s chief executive officer Yunos Abd Ghani said they included those who studied medicine, law and business.

In other words, these errant debtors include doctors, lawyers and businessmen who supposedly have standing in society.

Yunos said the actions taken against these defaulters include barring them from travelling, and 26,627 names have been submitted to the Immigration Department.

The excuses given by these defaulters are pretty pathetic. The standard line is failure to receive notices of demands because they have changed their addresses.

It is amazing that these people can remember checking their bank accounts for their money when they were in university but develop amnesia the minute they graduated.

Suddenly they do not recall owing the corporation money.

It is time that the agency resorts to publishing a list of these defaulters in major newspapers and also online.

Taking full page advertisements to recover RM400mil makes perfect sense. It would be effective and a good way to shame them.

If they have changed addresses or if they have forgotten, as some have claimed, family members and friends would remind them when they come across their names in the papers.

But the PTPTN said it has decided not to publish the names of defaulters as it felt it would not be effective.

I still think this method can work if the plan is properly executed. The PTPTN has to also publish the courses these defaulters were doing so we will have an idea of their standing in society.

There is no reason to think the move to publish the names would not shame them. They have after all shamelessly refused to repay their loans?

Why shouldn’t the public know the identities of these Yang Berhormat and Yang Berbahagia?

In fact, their names should be circulated to all the royal households to ensure that these defaulters do not qualify for any awards.

It should be a criterion as practised by some royal households such as Selangor, where the nominees for awards have to be screened by the police and Bank Negara to ensure they have clean records.

The PTPTN can take a step further by recommending that loan defaulters be disqualified.

As taxpayers, Malaysians, I think, have the right to know who these defaulters are who have not returned our money.

Their selfish acts have deprived future loan applicants as the fund would be affected.

We hope these defaulters have also been slapped with hefty interest rates as penalties.

The PTPTN should also seek the assistance of the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) and the Inland Revenue Department to track them down.

But it is good to hear from Yunos that 76% of borrowers start repaying their loans as soon as they finished their studies. That means the majority of borrowers are decent people.

The RM400mil is a huge amount of money. We definitely do not want Yunos to sit on these hutang papers and he can certainly depend on the support of the media to help recover the money.

It not money down the drain

ON THE BEAT
By WONG CHUN WAI

AT first impression, it may seem like a bad idea that will drain the country of more money. The economics of investing RM1bil a year for our own Formula 1 team may seem nonsensical to some.

But we must not overlook the economic benefits, including tourism promotion, that we can derive from having a Malaysian F1 team.

When we first took up the F1 challenge, the same apprehension – and even criticism – was made. Many questioned the rationale and wisdom of putting up an expensive race circuit where we Malaysians stood no chance of winning. More than a decade later, Singapore realised that it had missed the chance and has now seen the economic benefits of having an international event like the F1 on the island republic.

For us in Malaysia, it has become an annual event, bringing in the high-spending sports fans as well as the local crowd that has not thinned down. The Sepang Circuit in fact is now in need of more financial support for a major facelift and better facilities.

In 1997, Tourism Malaysia put its name on Rubens Barrichello’s and Jan Magnussen’s Stewart-Fords. Now, we are talking about having our own F1 team. A decade later, I am sure, is reasonable enough for the next step.

Last week, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said Malaysia should view the F1 as an important instrument to promote Malaysia to the world.

He said Malaysia would have to pay US$1mil (RM3.5mil) just for a three-minute advertisement in Japan.

With the F1 race, Malaysia is shown across the globe for hours and we would not have to pay for these advertisements.

Dr Mahathir calculated that for advertisements alone in Japan, the cost may run into US$100mil or US$200mil.

Let’s not forget that at every race, which major cities take turns to host, the televised rights go to over 300 television stations.

Last week, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak announced that the 1Malaysia F1 team would participate in the F1 race starting next year.

Look at the English Premier League. The only Malaysian symbol we still have there is the logo of AirAsia on the referee’s sleeves, and that is so visible that football fans cannot miss it. Neither can we miss the Korean slogan that runs across the side of Old Trafford, although none of us can understand it because it’s not in English. It’s a waste of money when nationalism is carried too far.

But the sight of two elephants walking towards each other on the electronic board to promote Chang Beer will capture our attention for sure. So will the corporate names on the jerseys of the big four – Chelsea, Manchester United, Liverpool and Arsenal.

Can you imagine the global advertisement value of having the Arsenal stadium being called the Emirates?

AirAsia boss Datuk Seri Tony Fernandes understands the value of creating a global name in sports. He’s a shrewd businessman and those who know him will tell you he’s tight-fisted when it comes to cash.

AirAsia is already a partner of the F1 Williams team and is now part of the Malay­sian F1 team. Fernandes has also just launched the Asean Basketball League and put an Oakland Raiders theme on an AirAsia X long-haul carrier. (The Raiders from Dallas is one of the top teams in the National Football League in the United States.)

AirAsia is no longer just a regional airline. It is now flying international and is obviously looking for maximum advertisement coverage. And there’s no better place than the sports arenas – the football stadiums and the F1 circuits.

We may not have a Malaysian driver yet for our own F1 team. Fairuz Fauzy has been a test driver for the Spyker F1 team but at 27 years old, he’s regarded as too old for the driver’s seat.

But it does not really matter. We have to take a major step for that to happen. The Germans, Brazilians, Britons, French or Italians did not become F1 drivers overnight.

We are sometimes too quick to criticise and do not look at the wider picture.

Former F1 Ferrari boss Datuk Jean Todt became a minor political issue when he was picked to be Malaysia’s tourism ambassador. A high flier who has access to the rich and famous in the world, he took up the job because of his relationship with actress Datuk Michelle Yeoh.

But we must realise that doors are opened to people like Todt, and that includes the media bosses in Europe.

As it is, it has been confirmed that Todt will be standing for election to head the Federation International Automobile, the governing body of the F1 and other auto sports.

It certainly helps the Malaysian cause to have a friend in powerful places, and the tickets that we pay for Todt is nothing compared to what he can do for the country, which none of our noisy politicians can. Take, for example, international shoe designer Datuk Jimmy Choo. He’s an icon. In Malaysia, he’s almost unrecognisable but in fashion cities like London, Paris and Milan, he cannot even have his meal in peace as he is often interrupted by guests asking for a picture or an autograph.

Choo has unimaginable international connection. Ordinary Malaysians like us just do not carry that kind of weight.

A mere mention by Choo of the Pangkor Resort, and American soul singer Macy Grey was at the island giving him a telephone call, which surprised even him.

Many of us have not heard of London-based mural artist Annie Newman but the Sabahan is painting up a storm in Europe where her clients include footballer David Beckham and his wife Victoria, and Arsenal legend Dennis Bergkamp.

In her own way, she has promoted Malay­sia tirelessly and whenever there is an opportunity, Newman would introduce Malaysian cooking to her influential friends and clients.

The reality is that promoting Malaysia costs money but the returns have to be good. It’s a question of how we can leverage from it.

We must right the wrongs

ON THE BEAT
By WONG CHUN WAI

IT’S refreshing. The decision by the Women, Family and Community Develop­ment Ministry to come out with a report that at least seven Penan girls and women were raped is another step towards the culture of transparency in Malaysia.

The report that these Penans were sexually abused by timber company workers confirmed what this newspaper reported last year.

It is a tragic story of neglect. We should be outraged with what has taken place but it may not evoke the kind of emotions that we ought to have because Baram seems such a distant land.

Let’s face it. Many ordinary Malaysians do not even know the existence of the Penans. But we should nevertheless be very angry. When this newspaper first reported this case, we were threatened with suits and one newspaper sent a reporter to the area to refute our case.

Although two victims, aged 17 and 21, had taken the trouble to lodge police reports in Bukit Aman alleging they had been raped, the police asked for more details.

The Sarawak police say they cannot nail the loggers who raped and sexually abused the Penans unless the ministry can provide detailed information that could lead to their arrest.

The state police have asked for detailed and specific information like names, dates and places. Sarawak CID chief Senior Asst Comm II Huzir Mohamed said the police needed accurate details. So it doesn’t look like the Penan girls and women will get the justice they seek.

Easy targets

Members of the committee who travelled to numerous Penan settlements in Long Item, Long Kawi, Long Luteng, Long Belok and Niah reported they had difficulties in getting details.

The report described the testimonies of a 17-year-old who said she was raped when she was 12; in another case, the girl said she was raped twice by a logger and became pregnant in 2005.

The findings of the committee are shocking – a lorry driver tried to molest a group of 10-year-old girls but they escaped.

The Penan girls are a target because of their dependence on timber vehicles to transport them to and from school.

Worse, the timber tracks are often the only means of access to their villages with schools and clinics at least four to six hours away.

The villagers are literally at the mercy of these timber companies. They cannot go anywhere unless the timber operators allow them through.

Imagine the plight of these rape victims who are now staying at such isolated villages. They have no one to protect them and now that this report has become newspaper headlines, how will they carry on with their daily routines if there is no support from the authorities?

Why have these sexual abuses been overlooked and why was no action taken even after they were reported by The Star?

Now that we’ve got reports by The Star and the ministry, where do we go from here? The lack of response seems to indicate that nothing is likely to change and the reports will merely gather dust.

It is disheartening to note that the ministry’s report has no legal implication. The police have already said their hands are tied and there is nothing they can do in the absence of solid information.

But we hope the sad stories of the Penans will wake people up. 1Malaysia isn’t just about the major races but also the “yang lain-lain” category. In fact, the Penans are classified as bumiputras too.

They may lack political clout but their plight must be given immediate support as the Sarawak interior has remained loyal supporters of the ruling coalition.

The ministry’s committee reported that the Penans have little access to registration, health care and education due to poverty and the remoteness of their settlements.

“All these issues are closely related to imbalanced development. The lack of infrastructure such as roads and public transport make it difficult for the Penans to communicate with the outside world, including the government agencies,’’ it added.

Leading the charge

The report, we hope, will wake the Govern­ment up. Minister Datuk Seri Shahrizat Jalil must be credited for taking up the case and coming out with an honest report.

It certainly wasn’t easy as the team had to travel over difficult terrains to speak to these Penan girls and women who had to be reminded of their sad past.

The ministry did not take a defensive approach but kept an open mind and sent its investigators to Baram and other Penan settlements. More importantly, Shahrizat initiated a serious investigation, like Transport Minister Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat who launched a crusade against those who stole public money of up to RM1.5bil in the PKFZ scandal.

His bold move has irked business personalities whose cosy relationships with political figures have been affected. Malaysians want to see leaders who dare to expose the ills of the country, even if it means stepping on powerful toes.

Certainly, powerful politicians and timber operators in Sarawak would be upset with the findings of the report but Shahrizat has taken them on.

In the New Malaysia, the people want to see new approaches being taken to uphold transparency and accountability.

 

Use your head, not your heart

Raw emotions were displayed at the meeting between Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim and the residents yesterday.

The emotionally-charged meeting turned ugly when some residents reportedly shouted profanities and even tried to throw chairs and shoes at the Mentri Besar.

Insults were hurled and insensitive remarks were made by those present, which shocked the Selangor elected representatives and pressmen.

The Aug 28 protest by about 50 people who marched from the state mosque to the state secretariat building to oppose the relocation of the 150-year-old Maha Mariamman temple from Section 19 to Section 23 has now become international news.

It would have been just an ordinary demonstration if the protestors had not paraded the head of a cow, an animal deemed sacred by the Hindus, and placed it at the state secretariat building.

The residents’ action committee has denied any involvement in insulting a religious symbol, saying the cow’s head was symbolic of the state government’s stupidity.

It is unlikely that their defence, if not excuse, would be accepted.

They could have just stopped those who brought the cow’s head and led the parade; but they didn’t. Or they failed, if their argument is to be used.

Never mind if the cow’s head was used to insult the state government. They simply didn’t use their head to think it over because the protest was over a Hindu temple. To use a cow’s head was sheer stupidity.

It has now put the Government in a fix. Police have interviewed over 70 people and have submitted their report to the Attorney-General for a decision.

The AG has sent the report back to the police asking for more details.

Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein has given his assurance that no one is above the law.

He has said clearly that those who brought the cow’s head should be hauled to court, and that the action should not be tolerated as the cow is considered sacred in certain religions.

Hishammuddin said the ministry viewed seriously issues that could undermine the harmony, national security and stability of multi-racial Malaysia.

It is important that such reassuring statements are made by our leaders because no one should give the impression, not even the slightest one, that such seditious actions are tolerated.

If they are allowed to get away with it, then the whole mission of 1Malaysia would be jeopardised.

The Government must not let one group hijack what they are trying to do for a better Malaysia.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak sent a clear message when he said Muslims should refrain from condemning or insulting other religions and their believers.

Follow the true Islamic teachings of showing respect, he said.

He added that Prophet Muhammad allowed believers of other religions to practise their creeds and forbade his followers from going against them. The Prophet guaranteed the rights of the minorities under the Medina Constitution.

In fact, Muslims are obligated to protect and honour any house of worship that is dedicated to God, even if it is a church, temple or a synagogue.

Any attempt to prevent the followers of any other faith from worshipping God, according to their own rights, is condemned in the Quran as sacrilege.

The history of the Islamic empires shows that in dominant Muslim societies, people of other faiths were allowed to flourish.

On The Beat by WONG CHUN WAI

Just study the history of the Moghul Empire in India where there are huge numbers of Hindus and temples.

In Baghdad, under the Abbasid Khalifahs, the Jews and Christians enjoyed the freedom of religion that they never allowed for each other.

These historical facts are well documented and any student of basic Islam would learn about the tolerance showed by true followers of the faith.

The religious rights of minorities must never be ignored. Muslims in some European countries, for example, have found themselves being discriminated against when it comes to building mosques because of opposition from Christian residents in some areas.

In May, about 250 people protested against the Attakwa mosque in a Belgian neighbourhood and in 2007, Germans staged a protest during the opening of a mosque in Berlin.

In contrast, a massive mosque stands on Nathan Road in Kowloon even though the area is predominantly Chinese. It is accepted and even promoted as a tourist destination. And rightly so too.

Muslims may be minorities in these places but they have the right to worship. Any place where people gather to honour God is always good.

Closer to home, Penang Island is predominantly Chinese but Mesjid Kapitan Keling sits majestically in George Town. It is the pride of not just the Muslims but Penangites of other faiths.

We have to be careful when we use terms like “majority” and “minority” because Malay­sia is a multi-racial country where one community would outnumer another in some areas.

Malaysia must encourage more multi-racial neighbourhoods like Subang Jaya in Selangor.

Enclaves with one race sometimes breed intolerance and the voice of a noisy and demanding minority can sometimes drown those of a moderate majority.

Moderate Malaysians must rise to the occasion as the world is watching how we are handling the the cow-head protest.

We have no place for hot-headed people who invoke God’s name with no understanding of tolerance and peace. Let’s use our head.

Hip-hop concert with a catch

ON THE BEAT 

By WONG CHUN WAI

IT’S unprecedented – a concert featuring American hip-hop/pop group Black Eyed Peas will be held in Selangor and the organiser is a liquor company! But there is a catch here – it’s only for non-Muslims.

The decision reportedly was made by the Information, Communication and Culture Ministry.

It appears to be a compromise, even a conciliatory move, by the authorities as liquor and cigarette companies are not allowed to sponsor concerts under the existing strict guidelines.

Guinness, the brewer behind the concert, is holding the event in celebration of its 250th anniversary on what is called the Arthur Guinness Day after its founder.

However, it would not be selling any liquor nor allowed to put up its logos.

It must be tough for the local company to explain these kinds of restrictions to their overseas bosses.

But there is a sense of growing conservatism in Malaysia, especially with PAS getting stronger.

Umno, as a Muslim party, has little choice but to show its Islamic credentials if it wants to regain the votes it has lost.

It has not helped that non-Muslims, angry with government policies, are willingly strengthening PAS without a thought to the implications of their decisions in the long run.

PAS has consistently declared its intention to set up an Islamic state and to impose Syariah laws.

Religion is a state matter and the state executive councillor in charge of religion is state PAS chief, Datuk Dr Hassan Ali.

He has led the charge in attempting to ban the sale of liquor in Muslim majority areas and has also pushed for mosque officials to arrest Muslims who sell, store or drink liquor.

The decision has become a major concern among operators of 7-Eleven outlets as the majority of workers in such convenience stores are Muslims, numbering over 1,000 nationwide.

Taking beer off the shelves in Muslim majority areas in Selangor would be easier but the potential to penalise Muslim workers is a major deterrent as they would have to handle such sales in non-Muslim areas.

We all know that in Malaysia there are many rules and laws that are never enforced, or are badly enforced, but there have been peculiarities and one should never take for granted any possible scenarios.

Nobody would have expected that Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarnor, a Muslim woman, would be sentenced to caning for a beer-drinking conviction.

A 7-Eleven Muslim worker, whether a cashier or a store manager, could be arrested and charged if the laws are strictly enforced. There would also be possible harassment or even cases of bribery with these laws.

The organisers of the Black Eyed Peas concert are obviously not taking any chances, preferring a low-key approach.

Malaysia is one of the four venues picked by Guinness for the global celebration because of its strategic location in the Asia-Pacific region. There is a huge amount of tourism money involved here for the celebration of Arthur Guinness’ Day.

The “no Muslims” decision is said to have been imposed by the Information, Communication and Culture Ministry, possibly to avoid any criticism from PAS, which has been consistently critical of such concerts.

Recently, PAS called for a ban on the concert by Michael Learns To Rock, a group of ageing musicians, on Sept 5 in Genting Highlands.

Last year, PAS also wanted a concert by Canadian singer Avril Lavigne to be banned, citing the rocker for being “sexy”, which earned world-wide ridicule for such a description of the skinny singer.

It would come as no surprise if PAS should also call for a ban on the Black Eyed Peas concert in Sunway Lagoon on Sept 25.

The “no Muslims” directive is being debated among many of my Muslim friends because they want to attend the concert.

They just want to listen to good music and have a good time. Even if beer were to be served, they would not touch it.

But to be deprived of watching a world-class act on grounds of their religion is something they cannot comprehend, nor accept.

It is a strange, if not illogical, decision. I have watched Black Eyed Peas three times in Malaysia – at Bukit Kiara, Bukit Jalil and the last time at Genting Highlands – and it has always been an open audience.

The restriction on Muslims attending the concert coming straight after the Kartika case has raised eyebrows.

The government appears to be stalling on the decision to cane Kartika, who would have been the first Muslim and woman to be caned for a drinking offence.

PAS has, however, insisted that the mother-of-two be caned and Umno has come under heavy criticism, especially during the Permatang Pasir by-election, for its seeming reluctance to support caning her.

The latest decision on Black Eyed Peas is bound to make Malaysia an international news item.

It looks like it will be a “boom boom pow” case with another “black eye” for the wrong reasons.