Author Archives: wcw

Cafe Latte Chat with Lim Guan Eng

What’s brewing for Penang?

 

CHIEF Minister Lim Guan Eng is aware that expectations are high for his newly-elected administration in governing Penang. He has had his share of headlines, sometimes for the wrong reasons, but he is determined to get on with the job. 

In this special Cafe Latte Chat, the first one-on-one discussion since this series was started last December, he shares his thoughts with The Star’s Group Chief Editor Datuk Wong Chun Wai while responding to selected e-mail questions sent in by readers. 

In just two days, The Star was overwhelmed with over 500 e-mails for the new Chief Minister. The questions came not only from Penangites but from all over the country, as well as a good number from Malaysians abroad. 

Although the number was high, the questions posed were roughly along the same lines. Some were concerned about local issues like traffic congestion and even street names. Many, however, wanted the Chief Minister to bring the shine back to Penang, asking him to clean up the beaches, restore the free port status, and focus on tourism. 

There were also questions on how to attract foreign direct investment and lure Penangites home to serve the state. A popular question was how the state would deal with the Federal Government. 

Online queries: Lim looking at the questions sent in by readers of The Staron Wong’s laptop during the Cafe Latte session at the Chief Minister’s office in Penang yesterday.

ADMINISTRATION   Without any experience working in the state or Federal Cabinet, how do you expect to run the state? Arlene 

Lim: When we talk about experience, I always say that I don't have experience in corruption and misappropriation of funds. So it is with that attitude – that if we are honest and have a sense of integrity, we have the ability and capability to do it. Of course it is a learning curve but if based on good principles, values and governance, I think we can benefit the state and get things done.  

How will you ensure that Penang will be better than when it was previously under the Barisan Nasional especially in carrying out projects like the monorail and Second Penang Bridge? Unnamed 

Lim: Number one is that there will be no “sweetheart deals”. We want everything to be above board. We want public interest to be paramount. If there is any hanky panky going on, we will immediately identify and take action. The fact is that this government is built on integrity. Don't try to get your way around through sweetheart deals and don't expect handouts. We are doing everything clean, everything above board and what we want is your service and your ability to deliver. 

We support all federal projects like the monorail and Second Penang Bridge but we are suggesting using money from Petronas so that we don't have to bear such a high cost. Look at the Sungai Nyior toll plaza. Just because you convert it from a “federal road” to “highway”, you charge a toll. That is ridiculous. How can there be four traffic lights at four intersections? So that is why when we talk about federal projects it must be about the people. Basically, I am saying that profits should not be privatised.  

INVESTMENT/ECONOMY 

How would you handle the delicate balance between the need for development and economic growth of Penang, the Federal Government and DAP objectives? Keith Saw (Melbourne, Australia)  

Lim: This is a symbiotic relationship. You cannot fulfil the equity aspect without growth. You have to have growth to deal with the equity requirements. Just like a ship. If a ship wants to turn, it cannot do so immediately, it must move forward first and then turn. So when you talk about the equity aspect, you must grow first, then you can move. We must grow together and I believe we can have shared prosperity. 

Since you may face many difficulties in getting financial resources to develop Penang, would you consider going out to the community residing abroad, namely in China, Singapore, Hong Kong and Taiwan to get their support to invest in Penang? WM Mak 

Lim: I do not want to talk about the Chinese, Indian or Malay diasporas. What we are talking about is the Penang diaspora. We should not just look at one country or a particular group. We will be more resilient if we do not limit ourselves.  

There is talk about bringing Penangites home. How do you propose to do that? And what are the areas where you feel they can contribute? Jelutong Boy 

Lim: They can invest in the state or adopt old buildings. Even if you adopt a small wing it will be good. Help make Penang a place where tourists want to come. Tourists are interested in greenery like the Botanic Gardens. This should be enhanced but needs heavy investment so the only way is to draw foreign investment.  

I am a Penangite currently studying in the UK. I would like to find out what is the way forward for Penang? What will be the emphasis? Jason Goh Wei Hsiung (Newcastle Upon Tyne)  

Lim: ‘I don’t boycott newspapers’

Lim: The aim is to make Penang dynamic again. We have said that many times in our campaign. We are not just talking about physical development but we are also making sure that the people's needs are being taken care of. We want a kinder, caring government that listens to complaints. We must make sure that basic services are provided for. We have taken the lead in democracy and must continue to do so in socio-economic justice and equal economic opportunity so when we talk about development, it must benefit Penangites and not just a few people.  

I am a Malaysian residing in Bahrain – the hub of financial movements in the Gulf Region and Middle East. I have been promoting bilateral links between the business community of Malaysia and the Middle East. Before the general election, we established the Malaysia Gulf Co-operation Countries Business Council and were promoting Malaysia as the preferred location for investment and business manufacturing operations. However, the key investment locations like Perak, Selangor and Penang have fallen to the Opposition. How strongly will the government of Penang and Selangor assist potential investors and provide positive assistance through the Ministry of International Trade and Industry? B. Norman Nathan (Secretary-general, Malaysia Gulf Co-operation Countries Business Council) 

Lim: If they are a proven outfit that can draw in quality business, we will lend support. We have no qualms. We want quality investment. Our main priority is for Penang to prosper but we want quality investment that lets us move up the value chain and makes us a premier tourist destination. For that we need infrastructure and hotels that are up to mark. We need high standards and the Penang state government will take the lead together with the private sector. 

POLITICS  You have been on the other side for quite sometime. What is the difference, being on the powerful side now? Mohamad Khairulnizam Bakeri (Universiti Teknologi Mara Malaysia) 

Lim: Of course, it's an eye-opening experience; the fact that the destiny and fate of 1.5 million Penangites are on my shoulders. You feel it heavily. At night you cannot sleep. You think about the many things you haven't done and need to do.  

But at the same time it is easier to get information and hopefully, the information is correct. I want to ensure that public interest is protected.  

For example, planning approvals. I want to introduce in the state exco meeting that planning approvals also be required for non-Muslim places of worship.  

Is there a formalised blueprint on the new state government's pledge to help bumiputras in Penang so that they are not marginalised? Ahmad Faizal Abdul Aziz (Gelugor, Penang) 

Lim: When you talk about helping Penangites, you cannot just limit it to one community. It is not just the bumiputras who have been left out. The non-Malays have also been left out. We should help every Penangite in need. We should be colour-blind and if the Malays are the ones marginalised, there is no question about our commitment to helping them. Also, bear in mind that we were not the ones to marginalise the Malays. So if they say that the Malays are marginalised, are they saying that they marginalised the Malays? I am not going to play the racial game. I don’t want to compartmentalise and say that I only want to help Chinese, Indians or Malays. We want to help all Malaysians in need. 

One of the major reasons the people rejected the previous government was because of the lavish lifestyle of the leaders. Can you eliminate this and focus on being down-to-earth leaders? Rizal H Ruslan (Tasek Gelugor, Penang) 

Lim: Let me give you an example. For safety reasons, I was requested to move into the chief minister's official residence. The CPO said that my personal safety was his top priority.  

I was making plans to do so but then I found out – typical Malaysian problem – bumbung bocor. But they just did the renovations. It will cost RM300,000 to repair but I did not want to come into my first term and spend so much money, so I am staying at my dad's place temporarily. 

This is the message I want to convey – we do not want to splurge unnecessarily except for the office where you need the latest equipment.  

Land alienation is another big problem. We want to make it public and do it on an auction basis. That way we can get the highest price. 

The past practices were riddled with corruption and cronyism. The only way to get rid of this is through transparency and open tender and public disclosure. If we have it on the Internet, everyone in the country will have access to it.  

We cannot completely eliminate abuse but we can reduce it. I believe that everyone in Penang will support it. Some people question why the same faces are always getting it but with transparency, at least even if they don't get it, they will be satisfied.  

Do you think the DAP-PKR-PAS coalition will measure up and deliver in five years or less? Chooi Kah Mun (Bayan Lepas, Penang) 

Lim: We have no choice; otherwise, we will be thrown out. So we have to measure up. We have to meet the expectations of the people but we hope that the people will give us the opportunity. We are under tremendous pressure from the Federal Government and certain parties that want us to fail. We cannot fail. That is not an option.  

Since the rakyat has given the opportunity for the Opposition to rule five states, will the DAP, PKR and PAS change its name to Barisan Rakyat? Kelvin Chan  

Lim: That is definitely on the table. We would prefer that the state governments we form with the support of all the three parties would be a push towards creating a framework for cooperation but that is still a long way down the line. Let us allow the state governments to function before we talk about the future. This is something that is definitely on the table although it wasn't in the past. This is something even the people realise. As long as some fundamental issues like freedom of religion, Islamic state, or hudud laws are not principle struggles of PAS and they want to talk about democracy, that is a positive step. 

Can you comment on the fairness of mainstream media? Ng Mok Huat 

Lim: Let me give you an example: A newspaper asked me what I was going to do. I said we would still go ahead with the open tender. What was reported was that Guan Eng would continue to go against the NEP. This is completely false reporting.  

We have complained to Bernama and they apologised. They take responsibility and hopefully will improve on this. What we want is factual reporting. This newspaper, however, is still caught in a time warp. They are in the dinosaur age.  

Can you comment on calls to boycott the mainstream media because of unfair reporting? Ng Mok Huat  

Lim: I don't boycott newspapers. 

LOCAL GOVT 

What is the state government's commitment to preserving the heritage buildings in the state? Lim Sue Lin (Penangite in Kuala Lumpur)  

Lim: What we are committed to is that in the planning process, we will not give blanket approval. But refurbishment and restoration is expensive. I am willing to go abroad not only to get investment but also to get funds for restoration but we must sort out the legal aspects.  

If we cannot sort out these legal problems, we must see whether we can get the owners to restore the buildings.  

If they cannot afford it, they should give us a lease or sell it to the government or international bodies who are interested in conservation. The question is whether this government is interested in development or conservation.  

The public parking lots are full of unwanted rusty vehicles – mostly cars with flat tyres in the Sungai Dua, Gelugor and Relau areas. These have become an eyesore in Penang. Thomas Wong  

Lim: We have to get enforcement officers to do it. If we can sell it to the besi karat people, we can make quite a lot of money. We will get the council to act on it. 

Parking fees are not standardised and are too high in Penang. Some use meters and some issue tickets. Parking fees even stretch through 10pm during Sunday/public holidays. This system only applies in Penang. Ng Mok Huat 

Lim: This also happens in other states, even in Kuala Lumpur. We haven't made an analysis but I was made to understand that this was because some areas have high demand.  

Sometimes standardisation may not be possible but we will do a study. The more important issue is simply issuing summonses. That is why we cancelled all those parking summonses. I am sure many reporters were very happy because they have been victims where they pay but are still issued summonses because the number was written wrongly. We have asked MPPP to improve. We must have a review with common guidelines implemented. We don't want to create chaos unless it is creative chaos.  

What are the plans to improve Komtar to its previous state? Khoo Keng Cheang (Tanjung Bunga, Penang) 

Lim: The previous administration wanted this to be the shining crown of the Pearl of the Orient but as you can see, Komtar is run down and might probably be outshone by the Penang Times Square.  

We have asked the PDC to come up with a plan to redevelop Komtar and probably we will have some input but Komtar is important to rejuvenate George Town. You cannot expect Penang to prosper without George Town prospering. Komtar must shine again but it must not be at the expense of the local traders. It must be a win-win situation. Our main offices are also here and we do not want to move. We should just set up branches of administration.  

TOURISM   What's your plan to improve Penang tourism, to the next level? William Cheah  

Lim: I was meeting with Matta the other day and we were looking at macro plans. There are certain aspects that we can improve. We need more tourist attractions. 

Whether aquarium or aqua tourism projects, we will consider. We want to develop more tourism attractions not so that private companies can profit but to enhance and make the places easier for people to enjoy. For example Bukit Bendera – we must improve access. Fundamental problems like cleanliness, traffic congestion and inaccessibility, and creating basic infrastructure must be addressed.  

You talk about inviting tourists but you must also focus on inbound tourists. We do not understand why Penang is treated like a stepchild. We are not included in the main itinerary for tourists when the three main destinations in Peninsular Malaysia are Kuala Lumpur-Genting, Langkawi and Malacca. What about Penang, which was supposed to be the Pearl of the Orient? 

We hope that with Unesco listing, we can attract more people to come here. Penang has her own natural brand name. We must build on that because this will also benefit the neighbouring states as well as Malaysia. 

Penang airport is very dirty, giving tourists a bad impression. Thomas Wong (visitor to Penang) 

Lim: Sometimes I also find that it is not up to mark but this is beyond my control because it does not come under my purview.  

I was recently talking to Datuk Syed Mohd Aidid – he is an Umno man but he gets things done. When the Penang Port was under him, the ferry system was making money; so why not find people who are able to make money for Penang run the show again?  

Now they are making losses. But I can't do anything because it is under federal.  

What I am saying is appoint the right people for the job. The main criteria are that they are honest, and have a track record of getting things done. 

ENVIRONMENT  What are the top environmental priorities that your state government will address this year?

Yeo Bee Hong (Kota Kinabalu, Sabah) 

Lim: We have to deal with cleanliness. It is a fundamental environmental issue. There is a long-term need to see how we can make Sungai Pinang and Sungai Juru not the dirtiest rivers in Malaysia and South-East Asia. These are considered level-five toxic.  

One of my assemblymen plunged into one of these rivers and came out with swollen feet even though he only immersed himself for 15 minutes – you can imagine the toxic levels. It is not an open sewer – it is a toxic dump. Cleanliness and cleaning up – how can we achieve this? We definitely cannot do it in a year – no way – but we need to make some improvements to the cleanliness of these two rivers.  

Gurney Drive needs your immediate attention. Could you please let us know if you have any plans to clean up Gurney Drive? Tan Phaik Chee (Persiaran Gurney, Penang) 

Lim: I think this has to do with the land reclamation projects like PORR. Now the only way out is to reclaim Gurney Drive. The water current and contour changes with the tide so that is the danger of messing around with nature. Nature always has a way of getting back. So when you talk about the dirty water and the physical changes along Gurney Drive, it is not something we can change. The whole character has changed.  

What we can do is to think of other methods like reclaiming an island outside to prevent silt from coming in.  

We have to see the impact of the Tanjung Tokong reclamation first. We have planning approval powers so we will ask the developers to look into this.   As Chief Minister of Penang, I invite you to clean up the beach of Batu Ferringhi. Anthony Fowke (Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia)  

Lim: That we will try to do but I have been informed by the municipal council president that they do conduct regular checks and the beach is quite good. So to those who have complaints, please let us know or call the council. If they do not act, we will act. 

Penang tap water contains too much chlorine. Thomas Wong (visitor to Penang) 

Lim: The quality is not as good as before and we need to have a check with the PBA to see how we can improve. Five to 10 years ago, it was much better and I find that sad. 

CRIME 

How would you make Penang a safer place to live where residents do not have to worry about crimes just like in the 70s and 80s. Koay LK (Jelutong Road, Penang)  

Lim: We are putting in more CCTVs but the most effective way would be to increase police patrols and cut down red tape and abuses. We need more personnel.  

I feel that patrolling is more effective than having more police stations. Some police stations only have one girl taking down reports at midnight. She is in danger because people can just come in and hurt her.  

That's why I am saying that we need more police personnel. Instead of patrolling the streets, the police are doing administrative work. We will continue to press for this at the federal level. 

Behave like true sportsmen

On The Beat


IF is there is one thing true sportsmen learn from day one is that you shake the hands of your rivals after a game.  

You congratulate them, sulk all you want in the changing room and then go back to the training ground to gear yourself up for the next match.  

The winner, on the other hand, should not gloat over his win and be unnecessarily arrogant.  

And of course, the last thing you want is to have your fans, whether of the winners or losers, to go to the streets to cause mischief.  

The politicians in Penang should take a leaf from true sportsmen. Not the sort one watches on the English Premier League, where arrogant footballers abuse the referee and throw tantrums, even when they wear the captain’s armband.  

The impression one gets after the protest by Umno leaders at Komtar on Friday is that they are bad losers.  

The reality is that the DAP, with the support of PKR and PAS, has formed the Penang state government and DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng is now the Chief Minister.  

It is hard for the Barisan Nasional, especially Umno, to accept the fact that they are in opposition but the people have decided. For the next five years, the DAP will be running the state and the Barisan must learn to live with that.  

Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon, who was knocked out in the elections, graciously accepted the loss like a true gentleman. He called up the Penang DAP chief Chow Kon Yeow to congratulate him and promised a smooth handing over of power.  

He turned up at the swearing-in ceremony of Lim, difficult as it may have been; he has earned the respect of most Penangites, even those who had been highly critical of him when he was Chief Minister.  

He has also called on the federal government to continue with projects such as the Second Penang Bridge, Penang Outer Ring Road, monorail and the public transport system despite the calls from Penang Umno to scrap it.  

Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, too, conceded defeat in the states even before the official announcements were made.  

Despite the allegations of massive rigging and cheating, the opposition won five states. That means democracy is alive in Malaysia and just as the Elections Commission has been bashed, it now deserves to be commended for carrying out a fair election.  

The police, too, came under criticism but they displayed their professionalism in carrying out their responsibilities, like good referees do. Inspector General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan has our salute.  

But it is something else for the Penang Umno leaders. Having criticised the opposition for street gatherings previously, they should not stoop to that level; the communal slant is certainly regrettable.  

They disrupted the traffic at Komtar and the shopkeepers had to shut down their businesses, which was no different from the Bersih and Hindraf street protests in Kuala Lumpur which we condemned.  

There should be no place for political grandstanding or emotive outbursts, as lawyer Zaid Ibrahim correctly said on a news website, as the winners and losers grapple with the results. For sure, there should be no fanning of communal sentiments.  

At the same time, Lim cannot be simply left off the hook. Call it political inexperience if you want, but it was wrong for him to announce that he would end the affirmative actions of the New Economic Policy from day one. That gave his opponents plenty of fire to shoot him and certainly he doesn’t need it as he tries to run a state government, which won’t be easy for him. He needs to realise that his government machinery is predominantly Malay and many Malays also voted for the DAP.  

There is nothing wrong with the NEP, only its implementation. Lim has to ensure that the NEP benefits the poor and not the rich with political connections. No one would fault him for that.  

These are early days for all sides. Opposition parties can no longer be called opposition at state levels and they are struggling to keep the governments running, realising the complexities of it now.  

The Barisan component parties, with internal polls for Umno and MCA ahead, have gone on to the blame game. It will certainly not help them redeem their dented image and may cause a further slide.  

Their priority is to reassess themselves and to ask how radical the changes they need to make to remain relevant – or will they stick to the old mould?  

The Barisan is still in charge at federal level and they have many chances to make populist decisions if they want to.  

We have to face the fact that the political landscape in Malaysia has changed. The New Politics has emerged with cross-ethnicity voting taking place and no one party dares say it is fully entrenched. 

 

 

Denial syndrome must end

THE SMS has got to be the most effective weapon in helping the Opposition knock out the Barisan Nasional. With over 22 million mobile subscribers, the SMS link connected urban and rural Malaysia such that news in one part of the country reached another part in mere seconds.

Three hours before polling closed, Malaysians were flooded with messages alleging electoral fraud in several constituencies contested by key Barisan leaders. That was enough to further raise the political temperatures of many Malaysians, who had already made up their mind to vote against the coalition.

There were more blows to come. Umno Youth deputy leader Khairy Jamaluddin was accused of being in a sex video. Those who took the trouble to check the blog found it didn't even resemble him, but the question remains – how many people were duped into believing this rumour or took the trouble to check?

Some of these messages were serious and direct but most poked fun at the Barisan. And certainly they worked effectively in this general election.

The bloggers and alternative media also inflicted serious wounds onto the Barisan but the impact may not be as strong as it has been made out to be. Admittedly, Urban Malaysia preferred these channels of information to the mainstream media, which certainly was part of the debacle of the Barisan defeat.

But it was the mammoth-sized ceramah, especially in Penang, that translated into votes, especially in the western states of Penang, Perak, Selangor and Kedah.

New Media analyst Oon Yeoh correctly commented in an article that the Internet was mainly for city folk. Many rural folk do not have access to the Internet and so did not benefit from information sent via online media, blogs or e-mail, he said.

During his visit to Jelutong, where blogger Jeff Ooi contested, Oon found out that most voters had barely heard of Jeff's blog and even fewer had visited it. It was the Chinese dailies, according to Ooi, who helped make him a known face to Penangites.

Oon wrote that one of the volunteers, a 42-year-old salesman who wanted to only be known as William, confessed he had never heard of Ooi before nomination day, much less visited his blog.

Ooi himself stopped blogging midway during the campaign period, preferring to give press conferences to the print media, speak at ceramah and meet his voters directly.

It was the traditional method of campaigning that played the major role. Certainly, it was the Rocket symbol, rather than Jeff Ooi the blogger, riding on the anti-establishment mood that led to his strong victory.

Some Barisan candidates also turned to blogging, hoping to connect with the young, but they gave up because the number of visitors was just too low.

Another development was that the Internet helped raise over RM100,000 in online donations, primarily for the Opposition candidates, with a large portion coming from overseas. It is probably the first time in Malaysian political history that political donations were raised this way.

Two news websites emerged during the elections, MalaysiaVotes.com and MalaysianInsider.com, but being newcomers, it was difficult for them to compete with the more established Malaysiakini.

The websites of mainstream newspapers had an even tougher time, being overly cautious on accuracy, particularly on results, and not wanting to rely too much on unconfirmed news.

In the end, the alternative media scored better as it did not have to worry too much about accuracy. An example was the newsflash on the purported 14 unopened ballot boxes in Lembah Pantai, implying there would be rigging. The report turned out to be false.

But this election was a wake-up call to the nation, not just to the leadership, but also the media. A serious and honest soul searching is required to truly feel the pulse of Malaysians. The mainstream newspapers have to learn, quickly, or face being abandoned by their readers.

As Bernama general manager Datuk Azman Ujang rightly said, Malaysians have spoken loud and clear, “not only on what kind of government they want but also the kind of media they prefer”.

Despite the mainstream media bashing, newspapers have sold well over the past two weeks, with the Singapore Straits Times quoting a media consultant G. Manimaran as saying that “for the first time in 20 years of journalism, I am seeing people queuing up to buy newspapers”.

With opposition parties now in control of five state governments, the media, including government-run TV stations, must be prepared to relook its editorial policies. Some vernacular newspapers, too, must end their communal slant as they should take into account that the votes for the Opposition came from all races.

The winds of change have swept through Malaysia and the fact is everyone, especially the media, has to wake up to that reality. It should be accepted, not resisted. The denial syndrome has to stop.

Ong sets out to rebuild a relevant MCA

He will not nominate himself for a Cabinet post or any government post. It’s a gracious move and he has demonstrated that leaders should always be prepared to take the rap.

Ong, who was elected as the Kulai MP, has also said this would be his last general election, a pledge that he made when he became the party president where he limited the term of a party president to nine years.

He has also come out clean – the Malaysian Voice has spoken loud and clear.

It did not just come from the Chinese or Indian voters but the Malays as well.

The reasons for the big losses by the Barisan are clear and Ong has rightly made his move by focusing on rebuilding the party and to make it stay relevant.

It is understood that four names would be submitted to Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi for him to consider for Cabinet positions – vice-president Datuk Ong Tee Keat, secretary-general Datuk Ong Ka Chuan, Wanita chief Datuk Dr Ng Yen Yen and Youth chief Datuk Liow Tiong Lai.

Ka Chuan, who was elected as the MP for Tanjung Malim, has served for four terms as a state executive councillor in Perak, is reportedly tipped to be the Housing and Local Government Minister.

Tee Keat, who was the Deputy Higher Education Minister, is said to be proposed as the Transport Minister, the former post of deputy president Datuk Seri Chan Kong Choy.

For the first time in MCA history, both the president and deputy president are not holding Cabinet posts. In fact, Chan did not contest the general election.

Another vice-president Datuk Seri Dr Fong Chan Onn, who was re-elected, is said to be staying out of the Cabinet to allow the rejuvenation process.

The talk is that Dr Ng would be Health Minister. Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek, who was Health Minister, quit his party and government positions early this year. He was a party vice-president.

Liow, certainly a rising star in the MCA, could possibly be the Human Resources Minister.

It is a ministry that he is familiar with as he served as a political secretary under Tan Sri Lim Ah Lek, who then held the minister’s post.

With the party required to hold its elections within three months, the MCA would now go through a difficult time.

The blame game has already started.

The salvoes have already been fired with former party secretary-general Tan Sri Ting Chew Peh and veteran Datuk Yap Pian Hon reportedly blaming the party’s rejuvenation strategy for the party’s dismal showing.

But Dr Chua has rejected such argument, saying the Opposition had many new candidates and yet made a big sweep of seats, saying it was the “lack of addressing fresh issues that caused the debacle.”

The next three months would be crucial for the MCA leadership.

Ka Ting and others would have to make efforts to boost the morale of the members, who would still be in the process of healing from the wounds of the election defeats and at the same time, attempt to ensure the contest for party polls would not get out of hand.

It would be a trying time. Caught up in the euphoria of the anti-establishment sentiments, the Chinese voters were not convinced by the good work of the MCA in education. It was not good enough as they sought to punish the Barisan.

A fight in the MCA would be the last thing the party needs to win over the Chinese voters, particularly when communal politics would now be seen differently.

It would be more important for members to stabilise the party, examine its approaches at a time when political parties chose the path of multi-racialism to win the young voters.

And as one academician puts it, do leaders of “BC” – before computers – have a place in politics in comparison to younger leaders of “AD”- audio-digital who see issues from a different perspective.

Changing leaders is one thing but changing the politics of the MCA may be more urgent in the coming years.

Waking up to new politics

ANALYSIS BY WONG CHUN WAI 

LET’S get used to some things. The likelihood is that the DAP secretary-general will soon be known as Yang Amat Berhormat Lim Guan Eng and in Selangor, possibly his Parti Keadilan Rakyat counterpart will be known as Yang Amat Berhormat Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim.  

In Selangor, Perak and Kedah, the former state government heads – Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo, Datuk Seri Tajol Rosli Ghazali and Datuk Seri Mahdzir Khalid – will be opposition leaders in the state legislative assemblies.  

That needs a lot of getting used to for the political establishment but it is the result of the political tsunami that hit Malaysia on Saturday.  

And 24 hours later, as Malaysians still recover from the shock, the players are still trying to make sense of the results.  

Still coming to terms with the worst electoral results for the Barisan Nasional, the top leaders huddled at the 39th floor of the Putra World Trade Centre in the early hours yesterday and appeared briefly for a press conference.  

There was really not much to talk about for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and his deputy, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.  

In a rather ironic situation, the media asked Pak Lah to pose for photographs by raising Najib’s hand when Barisan achieved a simple majority to form the federal government. But there was nothing to celebrate.  

It was a close call and, until the winds of change stopped blowing, no one dared to even predict the final outcome.  

Yesterday, there was unusual silence on the political front. The opposition victors wisely stayed away from any celebrations, so as not to create unnecessary misunderstanding.  

Clearly, even the opposition politicians could not believe that they had landed the two jewels of Malaysia – Penang and Selangor – while winning Perak and Kedah and retaining Kelantan.  

Winning elections is one thing but now comes the more difficult part – running a government, with the Barisan still holding on to the federal government.  

There is the complexity of the government structure, from the state secretariat to state-owned agencies and government-linked companies to the many city and district councils.  

Many of these people involved in the machineries are Barisan personalities, or more precisely, Umno members. 

No doubt, it would be a challenge to make the new state governments function smoothly. 

That’s not all. The business community, long used to dealing with the mentris besar or chief ministers, would have to start all over again. The judgment will be at the Bursa Malaysia.  

With Penang and Selangor as the most industrialised states, the economic implications will be enormous, especially with the Trade and Industry Ministry is still under the Barisan federal government.  

There are more implications in the tsunami’s aftermath. Clearly, all eyes will now be on Abdullah and his next step. 

The Barisan now has to take a serious review of itself. The Old Politics is over, that is a fact.  

The Opposition, especially PKR, has managed to offer a more multi-racial outlook, with younger candidates. As a product, it worked, and its appeal seemed to reach across to all races.  

Even with Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim openly saying that he would do away with affirmative action for bumiputras, the party continued to get the Malay votes. Issues on economic opportunities and education have always been sore points with non-bumiputras and it needs to be addressed. 

A new Barisan Nasional, possibly even a one-party multi-racial organisation, is an option for the leadership to consider. 

Old parties, all over the world, have always faced such identity problems, and Umno, the MCA and the MIC will be no exceptions.  

In the years to come, convincing younger voters to support a party purely on communal grounds will become tougher, even as Barisan has advocated multi-racialism as a coalition.  

In the age of Barack Obama, who is only 47, the Barisan component parties need fresh faces to appeal to the young voters of the coming years.  

Barisan needs to reinvent, rebrand and re-examine itself to stay relevant. It has to be bold enough to admit its mistakes if it wishes to be accepted by the people.  

The next round will be even tougher for Barisan.  

The opposition parties, with Penang and Selangor under their control, will have stronger financial muscles for the next fight. 

A two-party system seems likely to evolve from the outcome of this general election. The first page of the new Malaysian political era opens today. Certainly, the elections may have ended but the drama has only just started. Stay tuned.

Winds of change sweep Malaysia

The Women, Family and Community Development Minister said she had tried her best but gave an assurance that she was calm. 

From Penang, my colleagues sent messages that Gerakan acting president Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon was trailing newcomer Dr P. Ramasamy in the Batu Kawan parliamentary seat.  

The Gerakan, MCA and MIC were all wiped out, they said. 

It became clear by 9pm that the Opposition had snatched the state from the Barisan, sending shockwaves throughout the country as Malaysians braced for more shocks. 

In Sungai Siput, MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu put on a brave front as feedback came from his supporters that he had lost his parliamentary seat.  

He told them he was going home for a bath and did not return. 

In the words of many politicians, it was a political tsunami.  

There was more, Kedah also fell to the Opposition, then Selangor and Perak. 

The wounds inflicted by the Opposition were easily the worst for the Barisan.  

Even in 1969, the then Alliance only lost Penang and Kelantan.  

In Penang, the then opposition Gerakan, together with DAP and Parti Rakyat, won 20 seats against the Alliance’s four.  

In Kelantan, PAS had 19 and the Alliance 19. 

The People’s Progressive Party could have formed the state government if it had decided to forge a coalition with Gerakan, PAS and the DAP but the PPP refused. 

The PPP was just two seats short of forming the government but it refused to work with Gerakan, DAP and PAS.  

Even in that onslaught, Kedah remained safely in the hands of the Alliance with 14 seats against PAS’ eight and Gerakan’s two. 

Last night’s results stunned Barisan leaders and the media.  

They expected the winds of change to come to Penang and Kedah but they missed out on Selangor, certainly the jewel in the crown for the Opposition this time around. 

Barisan had focused its attention on the anti-establishment sentiments of the non-Malays but overlooked the mood of the Malay voters in some states.  

There was even a sense of denial in some ways. 

For Barisan, they had expected some dents in the predominantly Chinese areas and a serious challenge from PAS in the east coast states but certainly not in Selangor and Perak.  

While the non-Malays had their share of unhappiness, there were issues that cut across all races such as the cost of living, corruption, mismanagement and security. 

At the grassroots level, there were perceptions that Barisan, following the massive win in the 2004 polls, had become too strong and that there was a need for a strong check and balance.  

In 2004, the Barisan had 198 seats against 21 for the Opposition. 

The voters, especially those in the urban areas, obviously wanted to send a strong message to the leadership.  

They wanted their MPs to be more humble and certainly more careful with their choice of words, whether at their party assemblies or in Parliament. 

But there is a big mess to be cleared – new state governments will be formed in Penang, Selangor, Kedah and Perak.  

As at press time, PKR secretary-general Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim is expected to be made the new Selangor Mentri Besar and almost likely, his predecessor Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo, the opposition leader.  

In Penang, DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng will likely be the new Chief Minister.  

But federal-state relations will never be the same again.  

With the Barisan still in control of the Federal Government, it may even review its numerous projects in states lost to the Opposition.  

As the most industrialised state in Malaysia, Selangor will be affected in many ways. 

At local government level, there will be massive changes as politically-appointed councillors will have to make way. 

At 12.30am, the Barisan had secured a simple majority to form the government although there were neck-and-neck races in many seats.  

At the end of the day, however, the clear winner was the democratic system in Malaysia.  

Despite claims to the contrary, the 12th general election proved that democracy was very much alive in the country.  

Don’t let anger cloud judgment

LET’S be frank. If you are living in Kuala Lumpur, Penang or Perak, there is a high possibility that you are an angry voter who wants to put a cross on the ballot paper for the Opposition.

Some are so upset with the Government, that it doesn’t really matter whether the candidate is from the DAP, Parti Keadilan Rakyat or PAS as long as he or she is in the Opposition.

Tomorrow’s leaders?: Turbaned teenaged boys walking past PAS banners and flags on Jalan Kuala Krai in Kelantan.

But this is what democracy is all about. Elections are about making a choice and essentially, in Malaysia, the voter votes for either Barisan Nasional or for the Opposition.

In middle-class urban Malaysia, it would seem that the fastest way to be popular these days is to ride the anti-establishment mood.

As for a journalist, he is deemed credible, courageous and objective when he takes a swipe at the leadership and backs the Opposition.

Those who talk about freedom of speech can be incredibly intolerant of contrasting viewpoints. Some resort to name-calling and personal attacks instead of trying to convince or debate a point.

Let’s put it this way. We know the current system is flawed. Many of us are unhappy with our institutions and certainly much more should be done.

The system needs an overhaul and much of the mismanagement and inefficiency is intolerable, but the question is whether there is a better alternative.

But when non-Muslims talk about wanting to vote PAS, which has no qualms about changing our way of life, then we need a serious re-think.

For the past two weeks, statements by PAS leaders have shown that they have not changed, not that they ever promised that they would change in the first place.

PAS spiritual adviser Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat told his listeners at Nikko Hotel that those who vote for PAS would go to heaven. I guess that will not include many non-believers like me.

Turbaned PAS president Datuk Abdul Hadi Awang said it was perfectly acceptable to character assassinate political rivals. Before that, he refused to shake the hand of his Barisan Nasional challenger on Nomination Day.

But that’s nothing unusual.

In 2003, I had my first taste of Hadi’s wrath when my colleague crime desk editor Lourdes Charles and I wrote about the meeting that the fiery PAS leader had with radical Indonesians like Abubakar Ba’asyir and Agus Dwikarna.

These figures are classified as terrorists by many countries because of their links with al-Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiah.

Agus, who heads the militant Laskar Jundullah (Army of Allah) in Makassar, Sulawesi, is known for targeting American tourists in hotels. He is serving a 17-year jail term for illegal possession of explosives and suspected involvement in bombings in Manila and Jakarta.

The meeting, according to Indonesian academicians Dias Pradadimara and Burhan Junedding in the respectable magazine Inside Indonesia (October-December 2002), was a follow-up meeting of mujahidin in Yogjakarta to “integrate the aims and actions of all mujahidin to implement Islamic law.”

According to the writers, quasi-military groups from all over south Sulawesi were present.

The report irked Hadi, who admitted being at the meeting but said the Indonesian and Malaysian governments were aware of the three-day meeting and there was nothing sinister about it.

That’s fair enough.

But at a stadium in Terengganu, in front of thousands of supporters, he decreed that Charles and I were “anti-Islam” and “infidels”.

We subsequently received death threats and police reports had to be made. To be labelled “anti-Islam” is certainly serious. The police traced some of these calls but we decided not to pursue the matter, even though the culprits (PAS members) were identified.

Fast forward to 2008. Have things changed? No. There is still no place for non-Muslims in PAS, not even as associate members.

Incredibly, there are non-Muslims who are shamelessly contesting as members of the so-called PAS Supporters Club, not realising they have joined in to advocate the orthodox Islamic system being pursued by PAS.

That would mean more gender segregation in supermarket checkout lines, concerts and, of course, at swimming pools.

Yes, that would also mean watching movies with the lights on. If that is fine with you, then go ahead and vote for PAS.

Today, there are well-intentioned but misguided non-Muslims who are helping to campaign for PAS. Some even endorse the party even though it has a long history of criticising other religions.

The only excuse given by those who back PAS is that in Kelantan, there are temples and churches. What a pathetic argument because these places of worship exist in other states, too!

The PAS government removed deer statues in a Kota Baru roundabout when it took over Kelantan because it was unIslamic. Next, Hadi ordered the statue of the giant leatherback turtle in a Kuala Terengganu roundabout removed.

Yes, Kelantan has one of the biggest Buddha statues at Wat Machimaran in Tumpat but it has remained untouched because it has been there for a long time. Still, we remember how PAS cheered when the Taliban destroyed the giant Buddha carvings in Bamiyan, Afghanistan, deemed a World Heritage Site by Unesco.

True, there are local authorities in states controlled by the Barisan that have been unfair to many temple and church groups. Certainly, no one can deny that many of us cannot accept the ban on Christian books in Bahasa Indonesia.

But the action of certain extremist officers, at the lower level, should not be lumped as a policy endorsed by the Government. In these cases, the Government has intervened to put things right.

But we agree that these stop-gap measures cannot continue. There must be a clear and firm policy against officers who put non-Muslim religious groups in a fix.

And, yes, the local authorities should know better than to demolish a Hindu temple before Deepavali. It is simply wrong, and there are no two ways about it, even if it sits on illegal land, as Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has conceded.

When such things happen, the Government gets the blame. These officers can only be regarded as saboteurs.

From supporting the blasting of the Buddha statues in Afghanistan to calling Umno “infidel” for working with non-Muslim political parties and to the late Shahnon Ahmad’s book, SHIT, PAS has consistently demonstrated what it wants to pursue.

There are new and moderate leaders like Datuk Kamaruddin Jaafar and Datuk Husam Musa, but unfortunately, they are outnumbered by the likes of Hadi.

Let’s not send the wrong message to PAS by giving the impression that we endorse its agenda.

At a time when there is increasing conservatism in this country, with Muslim-based parties competing to show their religious fervour, it would be strategically wrong to endorse an Islamist party, simply to punish Umno.

The fact that PAS has stopped talking about implementing syariah law, for political expediency, doesn’t mean they have given up.

We must keep our liberal way of life. This is Malaysia, not the Middle East.

PAS’ Controversial Statements

Aug 15, 1997: Former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad was labelled murtad (apostate) for his remarks over three Muslim contestants prosecuted by the Syariah Court in Selangor for taking part in a beauty contest.

 

July 16, 2002: PAS reportedly distributed posters depicting Dr Mahathir as a Catholic priest, labelled “Mahathir Paderi Besar Gereja”.

Aug 1, 2002: Former PAS MP Bunyamin Yaakob was investigated by police for alleging that Dr Mahathir had watched a pornographic video with his grandchildren.

Aug 12, 1999: The late PAS president Datuk Fadzil Noor allegedly linked Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's family name with taking care of pigs. Fazdil later said he had no intention of insulting Abdullah but maintained his remarks were factually right.

March 3, 2004: PAS reportedly questioned Abdullah's integrity as a man of religion and attacked his late wife, Datin Seri Endon Mahmood, for not wearing the tudung.

July 7, 2006: PAS Dewan Ulama chief Datuk Harun Taib labelled Umno as kafir (infidels). He said he was merely following PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang's fatwa (decree) on April 7, 1981, that Umno was an infidel party.

Feb 18, 2008: PAS spiritual adviser Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat said Umno members were orang utan as they did not know Islam or anything about the law.

 

Into the second half of the fray


WE have now entered the second half of the fight. The general election is exactly seven days from now and Malaysians can expect the battle for the hearts and minds by our politicians to be tougher, if not, dirtier. 

The battlegrounds are in Penang, Terengganu and Kelantan, where the hardest campaigns are being fought. 

There is no place for slip-ups as the contest in the 2008 general election enters into the most crucial period. 

In Penang, the Barisan Nasional, especially the MCA and Gerakan, is taking on one of its fiercest fights against the opposition led by the DAP.  

The DAP is on the offensive by fielding its top guns in the state. Riding on the anti-establishment sentiments of the predominantly Chinese areas, the DAP has attracted large crowds to their ceramah but whether this would be translated into votes would be another thing. 

DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng, with much help from de facto opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, is heading the battle here. 

But Barisan top guns, including Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Gerakan president Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon, are also taking them head-on, well aware of the stakes at hand. 

MCA deputy president Datuk Seri Chan Kong Choy, who is not seeking re-election, will spend the next few days entirely on the Penang campaign. 

While no one expects the state to fall into opposition, the Barisan also does not want to lose its two-thirds majority. 

Learning from the past when Penangites rejected the DAP for attempting to wrest the state from the Barisan, the opposition has stopped talking of coming into power but they certainly hope that Penangites would go overboard by tilting the power structure. 

The DAP has cleverly played to the emotions of Penang voters by hammering away at Umno and even ignoring traditionally hot issues like Chinese schools because the federal government has announced huge pre-polls allocations, which is the effort of the MCA. 

Still harping on the keris issue, they hope to sway the Chinese voters. But any political adventure by the Chinese voters could end up with the Chinese power within the system eroded.  

The Malay votes, on the other hand, are likely to be solidly behind Umno. 

So, instead of wanting to punish Umno for the statements by one or two leaders, the community could end up punishing political parties representing their interests in government. 

The same predicament is faced by the MCA and Gerakan in Perak, Selangor and Kuala Lumpur, where the same fights are being fought. 

Like the Indian population, which stands at 1.6 million, the Chinese community is also shrinking and it now stands at around six million of the 25 million population in Malaysia.  

In Kelantan, the state is another battleground, where PAS has found its power being chipped away strongly by Umno. Although the Islamist party still has its grip on the state, reports says that the Barisan is not far behind in the race. 

The Barisan is turning its guns to 14 PAS state seats that were won by a majority of less than 10% in 2004 while it is confident of retaining its 13 seats. 

Both sides are racing against time to woo Kelantanese voters who work in other states to return home to vote on March 8. 

The Barisan has even named a Mentri Besar designate, Datuk Awang Adek Husin, to show its seriousness. 

In Terengganu, the fight between PAS and Umno has continued with PAS hoping to end the five-year rule by Barisan. 

But after having tasted the development brought by Barisan, the voters may not want the state to return to the opposition which ruled it for 18 years. 

The Barisan has transformed the once sleepy fishing state into an international arena, where world-class events are being held. 

The state is now led by a more dynamic leadership under Datuk Seri Idris Jusoh, a former corporate figure, who is being challenged by the turbaned Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang, who is known for his religious ultra-conservatism. 

Over the next one week, it could well be the longest period for these contenders. In past elections, the campaigning period would have ended by now but this time around, we are just entering the second half. 

Hoe leow, boh hoe leow?

 

COMMENT BY WONG CHUN WAI

BANGKOK Lane is famous for its mee goreng, with its tasty prawn-stock gravy and fritters, but on Wednesday night, Penangites were flocking to that narrow street for a different reason.

The road was packed with voters to listen to a DAP ceramah with state Opposition Leader Phee Boon Poh holding court. By Penang DAP standards, the size of the crowd would not be considered big.

But the mostly Chinese crowd was captivated with the incumbent Sungai Puyu state assemblyman's eloquence. His witty remarks, in Penang colloquial Hokkien, were greeted with laughter and applause.

“When you buy a car, motorcycle or even a bicycle, you get a geran. But in Penang, so many of us stay in flats and yet, it is so difficult to get a strata title. I brought this up at the state assembly, the government promised me that perkara ini sedang di beri perhatian dan tindakan akan diambil.

“They promised to send an official to look into the matter. But this chap, what can he do? He is not like the Goddess of Mercy who has 16 arms,” he said, as the crowd laughed along.

The seasoned politician took potshots at various targets, especially Umno Youth leaders. Often, he exaggerated his argument to emphasise a point. By the time he finished, the crowd was cheering wildly, asking for more.

When his Sri Delima counterpart R.S.N. Rayer took over the microphone, it was a tough act to follow. The lawyer’s “correct, correct, correct” joke, in reference to the V.K. Lingam inquiry, fell flat. It was a case of a joke being told too often.

Blogger Jeff Ooi, who is contesting the Jelutong parliamentary seat, had an even tougher job with the crowd when he decided to use Bahasa Malaysia and English. He focused on economic issues and this did not go down well with the mostly working-class crowd who wanted to be entertained rather than be informed.

Welcome to Penang – where Hokkien is the preferred lingua franca among the predominantly Chinese islanders. Even Malays and Indians, especially traders and hawkers, can converse reasonably well in that dialect.

The use of Mandarin, particularly in debate, is to emphasise one’s educational background but in the streets of Penang, it does not connect to the listeners. Even southern Hokkein, as spoken in Klang, Malacca and Johor, is regarded as crass and unrefined among Penangites.

When long-term Penang resident Datuk Seri Chia Kwang Chye found himself out of the race for the Penang Chief Minister’s post, supposedly because he could not speak Chinese well, he was understandably irked.

The Johor-born Gerakan leader, who is English-educated, can deliver his speech in Chinese and certainly in Penang Hokkien.

Penangites are well aware that the whole country is watching them. The state has become the focal point, where all the big fights are taking place. It is also the home of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and his nemesis Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

As Penangites compared notes the following morning over breakfast at coffee shops, they were aware of the responsibility they carry. They talked about which politician speaks better and whether the previous night’s gathering was hoe leow, boh hoe leow? (good or not, a term which could also mean delicious or not, in reference to food).

In my midweek foray back to my hometown, I noticed that while the crowds are large, they are nowhere compared to 1990 when Lim Kit Siang knocked out then Chief Minister Dr Lim Chong Eu by 706 votes and retained his Tanjung parliamentary seat by 17,469 votes.

That was not all. The DAP won 14 state seats, denying the Barisan Nasional its two-thirds majority, and was only three seats short of taking over the state.

But the DAP gains were all wiped out in 1995, when it only got one seat. Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon beat Lim in the Tanjung Bungah state seat by 7,497 votes. In 2004, Lim decided to move to Ipoh Timur and the Penang DAP still had only one state seat.

The DAP is understandably more cautious, having learn the lessons of the past debacles. With Lim Guan Eng leading the charge now, the DAP has stayed away from any talk of forming the state government and instead only called for a stronger check-and-balance.

But no matter how the politicians strategise, the reality is that Penangites are highly unpredictable. Their political fickleness is well-known and it is this scenario that the DAP is hoping for – just by some luck, with more checking than balance, the DAP may just end up with a repeat of 1990.

The Barisan, particularly the MCA and Gerakan, has harped on the importance of keeping intact the political structure of Penang, where the state is the only powerbase of Chinese politics.

They have warned against the community shooting themselves in the foot and strengthening Malay-based parties like Parti Keadilan Rakyat and PAS at the expense of the Chinese community.

“I hear church groups telling their congregation to vote anything opposition including PAS, which is simply naive and emotional. Whatever the flaws of the system, it still works, despite some occasional hitches,” said one Penang Barisan leader.

MCA and Gerakan campaigners are racing against time to tell their listeners that the statements of one or two Umno leaders, which smack of racism, do not reflect the entire government and that representation in the government is crucial.

Said MCA Youth vice-chairman Chew Kok Woh: “You can shout and bang tables but the fact is that the voices of the community can only be heard inside the Cabinet or state executive council meetings. Parliament only meets a few times a year but the Cabinet meets every Wednesday. The community must understand the realities.”

But no one dares to predict the mood of Penangites. They remember the gigantic crowd at Macallum Street, on the eve of elections in 1995, when Kit Siang basked in all the glory only to be unceremoniously dumped the next day.

At the end of the day, the argument for Penangites could well be, which party oo leow ah si boh leow, which means which party has the substance in the elections.

 

* Hoe leow, boh hoe leow means Good, or not so good, in Hokkien.

 

Making our institutions strong

IT has gripped the attention of the nation. So much dirty linen has been washed, so much mud thrown and so many amazing tales told that Malaysians must be wondering who to believe.  

Now that the Royal Commission has completed its investigations into the Lingam video clip affair, let’s take a step back and assess what the mass of evidence, allegations and disclosures really mean for us, Malaysians.  

Was it necessary for the dirty linen to be washed in public over 17 days? How much of it was the truth?  

Was it necessary for some sorry episodes in the history of the judiciary – former Chief Justice Tun Eusoff Chin’s holiday in New Zealand with lawyer Datuk V.K. Lingam certainly falls into that category – to be dredged up and dissected?  

What was the point in reproducing old pictures, where family members who have no part in the controversy, found themselves named and their photographs published?  

Was it necessary to embarrass the august institution of the judiciary with allegations of case-fixing and other improper behaviour?  

Was it necessary for the Government to push for a commission hearing that seemed, at times, to cast a shadow of shame over the whole country?  

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.  

Despite the misgivings of some Malaysians, the inquiry has given us a chance to come clean about an institution that has been manhandled over the past two decades.  

How can we even begin to rehabilitate this so important body if we do not understand the battery of illnesses that affects it?  

The whispering campaign about judge-shopping and other allegations of wrongdoing has been building up over the years to the point that it has prompted some foreign companies to insist that their legal disputes be settled through arbitration outside the country.  

This trend is more shameful than any mud that was flung during the commission hearing.  

It would have been easy for the administration to pay lip service to concerns about the Lingam video clip.  

It could have made the right noises and switched the channel after a week or so. We have to admit that it is the news cycle, which often dictates our attention span on an issue.  

Also, by and large, Malaysians are more interested in bread-and-butter issues.  

But the video clip issue did not disappear because Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi knows that a Malaysia without strong institutions will be a country without a soul.  

After all, the courts provide the public with their only chance of seeking justice. It is their last refuge in the face of oppression and when wronged.  

Abdullah has tried to protect the institutions by appointing straight shooters like the late Tan Sri Abdul Malek Ahmad as the Court of Appeal President.  

Datuk K.C. Vohrah, a retired Court of Appeal judge, noted recently that Abdul Malek should have been made Chief Justice for his principles and steadfast adherence to fair play and justice.  

“The late Malek was an uncommon Malaysian, whose most important characteristic was his natural and tremendous sense of fair play and his unquestioned integrity.  

“He was the Chief Justice that this fair country should have had but never did,” he said at a remembrance event organised by Universiti Malaya and the Malaysian Inner Temple Alumni Association in memory of the former President of the Court of Appeal who died on May 31 last year.  

Similarly when Abdullah appointed Datuk Abdul Hamid Mohamad as the Chief Justice late last year, it was evident that he was interested in restoring order and credibility to the judiciary.  

Only if good people are put at the top of an institution, will it flourish and give confidence to Malaysians and investors. 

Don’t take my word for it. Let’s just turn back the pages of history and recall some of the illustrious names who led the Malaysian judiciary during its days of glory – the late Tun Mohamed Suffian Hashim and Sultan Azlan Shah to name a couple.  

It is not only the judiciary that will benefit from having good men and women at the helm. Even the reforms in the police force and the civil service have a better chance of succeeding because Tan Sri Musa Hassan is the Inspector-General of Police and Tan Sri Mohd Sidek Hassan is the Chief Secretary to the Government. 

There is much truth in the saying that the fish starts rotting from the head.  

For the Royal Commission members, the hearing is over but their work is only beginning. Over the next few weeks, they will receive written submissions from various parties, deliberate over the information given by 21 witnesses and then get down to the serious job of making their findings.  

Anyone following the inquiry can tell you that some individuals were sparing with the truth.  

They huffed and puffed and even made light of the situation. But this was no laughing matter. At the centre of this hearing was the credibility of an institution that all Malaysians have a stake in.  

It is hoped that the panel will not only be clear in their views about the video clip and the main actors but also recommend suggestions on how the selection and promotion of judges can be strengthened.  

Only by doing so can it help an administration that is keen to improve the health of the judiciary and all other institutions here.  

Only by doing so will it prevent a future generation of Malaysians from having to sit through another session of painful revelations years down the road.